|
Back to Index
Ban lift excludes human rights groups
Extracted from Media Update 25/2008
Media Monitoring Project Zimbabwe (MMPZ)
September 01, 2008
Hopes that government
would come to its senses and heed intensified calls for the unconditional
lifting of its ban on field operations of NGOs and private voluntary
organisations were dashed following media revelations that not all
aid agencies in the country can get back to work and help alleviate
the plight of mostly starving Zimbabweans.
The ban was imposed three
months ago during the run-up to the widely-condemned June 27 presidential
run-off when government accused the independent aid groups of supporting
the opposition.
However, a month ago,
the authorities agreed to lift the ban to help pave way to power-sharing
talks with the opposition but did not effect it until August 29th.
The move coincided with recent representations to government from
various quarters including the opposition MDC, the United Nations,
and the US.
Although both public
and private media reported the Social Welfare Ministry announcing
the suspension of the field operations of the NGOs and private voluntary
organisations with "immediate effect", they noted the
new stringent measures attached to resumption of operations by the
independent aid organisations.
These included furnishing
the parent ministry with "monitoring and evaluation forms"
which require them to detail budgets and organizational structures,
with a September 30 deadline (Studio 7 3/8).
The private
radio station reported the National
Association of Non-Governmental Organisations (NANGO) as saying
NGOs and donors were currently holding a "series of meeting
to determine whether they should comply with the newly-imposed regulations".
Earlier, The Standard
(31/8) reported NANGO expressing concern that government's
lifting of the ban could fail to bring the required change as it
lacked any "tangible commitments . . . to remove the bureaucratic,
security, financial and other restrictions to effective humanitarian
operations". It quoted the organisation's spokesman,
Farai Ngirande, lamenting its "selective application",
which "excludes" several organisations operating in
areas such as transitional justice, human rights, governance and
democracy.
The paper quoted Ngirande:
"It also does not recognise the inseparability of Civil Society's
social, economic, cultural, political and civic responsibilities".
In fact, Studio 7 (3/8) reported NGO sources alleging that government
continued to bar them from providing humanitarian assistance despite
its claims that food distribution and other forms of aid can resume
if NGOs meet new registration and reporting requirements.
Besides, it cited the
sources saying the authorities were only allowing the private voluntary
organisations to help the "most vulnerable segments, including
people living with HIV/AIDS, and continues to bar them from helping
the general population".
MMPZ totally agrees with
NANGO's calls for the government to create a "conducive
environment" for civil society to help "millions of
suffering Zimbabweans", given the "critical role that
NGOs must play in this current environment characterised by economic
collapse, social distress and humanitarian crisis".
Visit the MMPZ
fact
sheet
Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.
TOP
|