|
Back to Index
South
African company charged with illegal importation of broadcasting
equipment - MISA-Zimbabwe
MISA-Zimbabwe
July 17, 2008
South African
company, Globecast Satellite, whose two employees were acquitted
of practicing journalism without accreditation in April 2008 by
a Harare magistrate is now being charged with illegal importation
of broadcasting equipment in violation of the Broadcasting
Services Act (BSA).
At the commencement of
the trial on 15 July 2008, Globecast Satellite which is being represented
by Thabani Mpofu, pleaded not guilty to charges of contravening
Section 7 (1) as read with Section 7 (4) and 7 (5) of BSA which
outlaws the provision of broadcasting services or operating a signal
carrier without a licence.
Magistrate Archie Wochiunga
first heard evidence from Cloud Nyamundanda who is the acting Chief
Executive Officer of Transmedia Corporation. Nyamundanda's
told the court that the Corporation invited Globecast to provide
a satellite 'uplink' during the 29 March 2008 elections.
In terms of a contract signed between Transmedia and Globecast which
was tendered in court as the first exhibit, the contract would run
from 25 March 2008 to 6 April 2008.
It was also Nyamundanda's
evidence that Transmedia would apply for the operating licence from
the Broadcasting Authority of Zimbabwe (BAZ).
He told the court that
Transmedia had liaised with its parent Ministry of Information and
Publicity which had approved Globecast's invitation resulting
in the Ministry issuing a letter of invitation to Globecast which
was produced in court as the second exhibit.
It was Nyamundanda's
evidence that in preparation for the arrival of Globecast he had
telephoned BAZ requesting for an invoice for a licence for the satellite
uplink for two days beginning 28 -29 March 2008. He told the court
that he received the invoice late on 27 March 2008 with a request
for the payment of US$3,200.
Nyamundanda testified
that two Globecast engineers arrived in Harare on 27 March 2008
and subsequently interviewed the Minister of Information and Publicity
Dr Sikhanyiso Ndlovu which was also beamed by CNN without the corporation's
knowledge in violation of the terms of the contract.
Cross-examined by defence
lawyer Beatrice Mtetwa on 16 July 2008, Nyamundanda insisted that
Globecast was in breach of the contract as they had proceeded to
provide the satellite uplink in the absence of an engineer from
Transmedia, a contention which Mtetwa insisted was not in the contract.
Mtetwa took issue with
the unilateral variation of the terms of the contract by Transmedia
which applied for a two- day licence despite having invited Globecast
for the period of 25 March - 6 April 2008. She argued that the variation
was not communicated to Globecast and that in any event it did not
make any business sense for Globecast to have invested so heavily
for a two- day business venture.
On further grilling by
Mtetwa, Nyamundanda failed to explain how Globecast would have known
that they were not supposed to commence transmission services before
28 March 2008 when that had not been communicated to them.
The state also led evidence
from Obert Muganyura the Chief Executive Officer of the BAZ who
testified that it was their duty as the regulatory authority to
issue licences to service providers,
Muganyura told the court
that it was Transmedia and not Globecast, which should have applied
for the licence from BAZ.
The trial is expected
to continue on 22 July 2008 when more witnesses including the Minister
of Information and Publicity Sikhanyiso Ndlovu are expected to give
evidence.
Visit
the MISA-Zimbabwe fact
sheet
Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.
TOP
|