| |
Back to Index
This article participates on the following special index pages:
2008 harmonised elections - Index of articles
Talks, dialogue, negotiations and GNU - Post June 2008 "elections" - Index of articles
Daily
Media Update 57
Media Monitoring Project Zimbabwe (MMPZ)
July 01, 2008
Summary
Enjoying a monopoly on the local news market again today, the government
dailies, The Herald and Chronicle took the opportunity to distort
the critical verdicts of all three African observer missions and
downplay almost universal condemnation of Friday's presidential
run-off, particularly by regional leaders attending the African
Union summit in Egypt. Instead, the papers continued to pervert
any truthful interpretation by focusing on the few selective statements
endorsing Robert Mugabe's return to the presidency.
They also continued to parrot the government's regime-change
mantra, publishing conspiracy analyses in defence of the controversial
poll from which the MDC leader, Morgan Tsvangirai, withdrew
citing a sustained, nationwide campaign of state-sponsored violence
against his party's supporters, and a corrupted electoral
process. Since the election result, the papers have also adopted
Mugabe's suddenly conciliatory approach to the idea of inter-party
dialogue without comparing this position with his belligerent pre-election
statements. Between them, the papers carried 16 stories on Zimbabwe's
post-election crisis, although that is not how they interpreted
developments. Of these, 14 were reports on issues arising from the
election, while two were official statements claiming that the post-election
period was peaceful.
Post-election
focus
Both government papers avoided reporting objectively the events
at the AU summit, which ends today, and even failed to discuss what
the summit was about. Instead, they dismissed the fact that pressure
was mounting on Mugabe over the fraudulent poll by portraying him
as enjoying popular support from regional leaders. The Herald's
report on the AU summit headlined, "AU shuns debate on Zimbabwe",
narrowly focused on the point that Zimbabwe was not on the official
agenda of the summit "as had been wished by its detractors,"
and was evasive about the critical statements made about the presidential
vote by various leaders, such as Kenya's Prime Minister, Raila
Odinga. Instead, the papers reported that although speakers at the
summit did mention Zimbabwe, "their comments
were not hostile but encouraged dialogue between the major political
parties in the country".
To support this they prominently exploited diplomatic statements
such as that by AU chairman Tanzanian President, Jakaya Kikwete,
and AU Commission chairman, Jean Ping, urging the parties'
to work together "because it (Zimbabwe) was facing serious
challenges". There was no attempt to explain what these "serious
challenges" were.
The Herald also bragged that China had refused to join the anti-Zimbabwe
crusade and impose sanctions on Zimbabwe and had instead given the
"thumbs-up to President Mugabe's call for talks between
his party and the opposition". The paper made no effort to
give an honest explanation for China's observation that a
crisis existed in Zimbabwe that required "stabilization"
and dialogue.
In defence of the paranoid fear of recolonization, The Herald carried
an editorial stating that "the ghost of Sharma El Sheik was
likely to haunt generations of Africans to come if the continent's
leaders do not stand up to a new wave of neo-colonialism disguised
as some mild form of liberal interventionism by the self-appointed
policemen of the world". But the author failed to state that
the African continent aspires to democratic values and that the
observer missions that condemned the recent election were not the
"self-appointed policemen of the world" but Africans
bearing the standards of the African Union - which the AU
observer mission precisely found wanting in Zimbabwe. It was that
statement that was perversely distorted by the government dailies
giving the wrong impression of its findings, which were: " . . . in
the context of the AU Declaration on the Principles Governing Democratic
Elections in Africa, it is the considered view of the African Union
Observer Mission that the Election process fell short of accepted
AU standards."
This conclusion
was censored by the government papers. Instead, The Herald selectively
quoted the AU mission statement as saying the poll itself was "peaceful"
and held "in accordance with the electoral laws of Zimbabwe".
In the same vein, The Herald suffocated the conclusion of the SADC
Election Observer mission, whose report declared, "the elections
did not represent the will of the people of Zimbabwe".
Although the SADC team's condemnation was censored, the alleged
division within the group over its findings was considered by an
unnamed analyst to be "proof that the regional grouping had
been infiltrated by Britain and America" to push their regime-change
agenda, a sentiment reflected by the author of the editorial, which
took time to insult Odinga and others who found Zimbabwe's
election "illegitimate". But he remained silent on ANC
president Jacob Zuma's comment that the situation in Zimbabwe
was "out of control", another comment missing from the
papers' news pages.
According to The Herald, SADC's Angolan team leader, Jose
Barrica, refused to endorse the document. The Herald quoted an unnamed
Namibian observer saying: "The real problem was with the conclusion
in relation to the campaigning period. Both sides agree that there
was violence but they differ on the extent to which it impacted
on the polling on voting day".
The group also raised concerns over allegations that people had
been forced to vote, but these concerns were also dismissed.
An offensive, dishonest and insulting news analysis, in The Herald
accusing the BBC of carrying false reports of the crisis in Zimbabwe,
suggested that widely publicized pictures of the victims of violence
in the run-off campaign were "road accident victims"
included to support fictitious claims of state-sponsored violence.
The author, Dambudzo Mapuranga, also dismissed the abduction
of MDC activist Tonderai Ndira as an "incredible . . . the
dog-ate-my-homework" fairy tale. He accused Ndira of petrol
bombing a Marimba police station, an offence for which he was never
convicted, and accused him of living "the life of a thug".
This appalling nonsense included the only reference to his brutal
murder as being "those who live by the gun die by the gun"
- presumably a reference to justice in Zimbabwe today.
In making this primitive and crude argument, Mapuranga exposes himself
to the very crime he accuses the Western media of committing: that
they are "nothing more than public relations offices of their
countries' foreign affairs ministries."
Both dailies also quoted the president of the Chiefs' Council,
Chief Fortune Charumbira, congratulating Mugabe for "winning"
the elections and "commended" him for agreeing to inter-party
talks which showed that he was a "true Zimbabwean who wants
to see peace and unity prevailing".
Political
violence
The two government papers continued to deny the existence of post-election
violence against the electorate that has been widely reported in
the private electronic media. Instead, the papers carried two reports,
which were passive statements by the police reinforcing the notion
that the country was enjoying "peace and tranquility".
Fig
1: Voice distribution in The Herald and Chronicle
| Govt. |
ZANU
PF |
Other parties |
Foreign
diplomats |
ZRP |
Traditional |
ZFTU |
|
2 |
4 |
2 |
9 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
Visit the MMPZ
fact
sheet
Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.
TOP
|