|
Back to Index
Journalistic
training in conflict-related situations - Journalistic Training
Symposium 2008
Deutsche
Welle
2008
Download
this document
- Acrobat
PDF version (2.76MB)
If you do not have the free Acrobat reader
on your computer, download it from the Adobe website by clicking
here.
The evolving role
of digital media in Africa: Kenya and Zimbabwe
Chido Makunike
African media
is disproportionately dependent on Western agencies for news of
the world, and even for news about much of Africa. A lot of the
news diet served Africans by their media is therefore often the
perspectives of Westerners. At worst this tends to focus on crisis,
hunger and bloodshed to the exclusion of much else. But even when
this is not the preoccupation, Africans often have to get news of
their own reality through a Western filter. Perceptions and views
of 'self ' and other Africans, and of people and events in the rest
of the world, are based primarily on how those people and events
are portrayed in the initial reports of the Western news agencies.
Digital media
has reduced this exclusive reliance on Western news agencies, and
made it possible to get direct reports on issues and events of interest
in many parts of Africa and beyond. Even when the still dominant
Western news agencies are the primary sources of the initial reports
on a situation in an African country, Africans with access to the
Internet now have the means to widely communicate their own interpretations
of the events to each other and to the world in a way that was not
possible before the advent of this technology.
As in other
parts of the world in their relatively early stages with digital
media, African web publishers have used these media mainly for social
networking, to show off their interest or knowledge on a particular
topic and other such personally focused uses. As elsewhere, African
users of digital media have enjoyed the newfound power to be heard
and seen in ways not accessible to them before, and on their own
terms.
The 'professionalism'
of this type of citizen publishing is mixed. Many make little serious
effort to adhere to rigorous professional standards, but most readers
are savvy enough to treat the musings of bloggers, for example,
with that in mind. A few blogs and websites work hard to produce
a quality product, while many are more concerned about expressing
themselves than they are about quality. A more forgiving yardstick
is used to judge the content of such media than is used for more
conventional "professional" media. Bloggers are generally
understood to be opinionated non-professionals who are not necessarily
seeking to be journalists but to merely be heard, while the professional
media is expected to also live up to certain minimum standards of
objectivity. But there have been times when unrest in a country
has forced such 'vanity publishing' to fill gaps left by conventional
media. An example was the recent post-election unrest in Kenya.
Several Kenyan
blogs became important sources of news for many reasons. Events
were developing faster than the conventional media could keep up
with them. Conventional media was constrained by relatively inflexible
publishing deadlines from delivering news as it happened, even if
they also had an online presence that could have made them keep
up with the bloggers. It was not just access to digital media that
was the issue, but a completely different approach to publishing.
The bloggers
had no publishing deadlines and other structures to worry about
as did the conventional media, and could publish 'on the fly.' Several
Kenyan bloggers became reliable sources of as-it-happened news,
perspectives, photos and rumors. Many of the conventional media
began to cite the blogs to gauge what public sentiment was, even
if they did not go as far as to claim the bloggers were delivering
'straight' news. In at least that regard the best of the blogs served
a very useful function which conventional media struggled to keep
up with, at least for the weeks of the unrest.
Although many
of these blogs may have fairly limited readership during normal
times, during Kenya's crisis the conventional media amplified the
reach of the bloggers by bringing them to the attention of many
readers who might never have come across them.
There were
also some blogs that fed into the ethnic tensions and seemed to
want to stoke them, but the conventional media was generally careful
to stay clear of recommending these to their readers, helping to
limit their reach and influence. Another factor was that the Internet
is available to a rapidly growing but still small percentage of
Africans, so the influence for both good and bad of digital media
is still very small compared to radio, the main source of news for
Africans.
In most African
countries the dominant media are generally government controlled,
leading to a heavy emphasis on the views of officialdom. Digital
media are now an important support help to independent conventional
media.
Kenya and Zimbabwe
have many things in common. But their political progressions have
sharply differed in the last decade. Kenya has become gradually
more open and democratic, with a vibrant private media to provide
balance to the official media. Zimbabwe, on the other hand, has
seen its political and media space shrink dramatically. Many middle
of the road and government-critical publications have been forced
to close, both because of the country's poorly performing economy
and an increasingly controlled and hostile media-operating environment.
The few remaining private independent media struggle to survive,
and their reach has remained stagnant or declined. This has left
a rabidly pro-government and virulently anti-opposition media (newspapers,
radio and TV) as the only source of information for the vast majority
of Zimbabweans, even those who dismiss much of what that official
media serves as outright propaganda.
The closure
of many private news outlets on economic and political grounds has
driven many of the country's media professionals out of the country.
That and the hunger of Zimbabweans at home and abroad for news alternatives
to the government media has spawned a thriving, almost exclusively
digital media alternative, based mainly in South Africa and the
UK. This has led to the unusual situation of most of the Zimbabwean
media being based outside the country! The many externally-based
Zimbabwe websites and blogs broadly serve two main functions: to
aggregate news articles about Zimbabwe from all over the world and
to provide platforms for Zimbabweans around the world anguished
about events in their country to vent and debate their feelings
and opinions.
A number of
the websites reflect the professional media training of their operators.
These are run according to fairly strict journalistic standards,
performing a role very similar to that of some of the now defunct
Zimbabwe newspapers. Some of them have maintained good sources in
Zimbabwe and are occasionally even able to feature news 'scoops'
that shame the in-country media. Many of these more 'formal' types
of digital media also often feature well-argued opinion and analytical
pieces. It is no longer considered odd or unusual for readers of
the externally based websites to be better and quicker informed
of political news at home than many people actually living there.
Most of the
blogs and websites, however, are not and do not seriously seek to
be considered as authoritative sources of news or analysis. They
mainly provide space for readers to vent their true feelings about
the overall crisis in Zimbabwe. While not professional journalism,
this is nevertheless a useful function in a country where most avenues
for political expression which is contrary to the official government
view have been ruthlessly suppressed.
As useful as
is the function that is served by this more emotive, less journalistic
type of digital media, it has its limits. For one thing, more expressive
heat than analytical light is generated. This is not necessarily
an indictment of this type of website/blog, but merely an indication
of the unique and narrow, non-journalistic purpose for which it
exists. It seeks to be a social vent for pent-up feelings that have
few other means of being expressed, by either readers reluctantly
far away from home, or at home but feeling politically oppressed.
Almost all of
the externally-based online Zimbabwean media are generally critical
of the currently ruling government. In this respect it could be
said to lack ' balance.' This state of affairs is to a large extent
because most of the Zimbabweans who operate and patronize these
websites are in some way 'in exile' because of the political and/or
economic situation at home, and so as a group they can be loosely
considered to be critics of the government. Others would argue that
the overwhelmingly government-critical tone of the sites is simply
a true reflection of the sentiments of most Zimbabweans. Still others
would argue that this overwhelmingly government- critical stance
is justified by the need to give a platform to the voiceless and
to counter the stridently pro-government stance of Zimbabwe's official
media.
The Zimbabwean
digital media is an important source of information for the many
Zimbabweans outside their country. They may still log onto the government's
digital media to get the official angle on an issue, but they will
then resort to the private, externally-based websites and blogs
for opinions, interpretations and contrary views.
Although relatively
few people in Zimbabwe itself have direct access to the Internet,
this does not mean the influence of the external digital media there
is minor. Those few who have access to it vastly amplify what they
read online to many others because of the great 'news hunger' that
exists in Zimbabwe. That amplification takes many forms. Word of
mouth and cell phone SMS are two of the major means, with downloaded
articles also being passed on electronically to those who may have
email but not Web access.
The externally-based
digital Zimbabwean media therefore have an importance and influence
far beyond their direct and primary reach. Government spokespeople
have often inadvertently helped the penetration of the critical
digital media by sometimes strongly reacting to articles featured
in them, raising general awareness of the existence of such critical
voices even when Zimbabweans have not been privy to the original
digital articles being criticized! Such government reaction is partly
in recognition of the powerful role of such critical digital media
in influencing world opinion about events in Zimbabwe, even if the
critical digital media's direct influence in shaping opinion within
the country is more limited.
Training
implications of the rise of digital media:
Many practitioners/operators
of digital media are not professional journalists and do not seek
to be.
Many trainers
have their background in conventional media and look down on nonjournalist
digital media practitioners. This is a now outdated way of looking
at things that the trainers need to be trained out of! Digital media
and digital journalism are not necessarily one and the same thing,
and yet many trainers still act as if they are or should be. The
trainers themselves are still battling to catch up with the many
changes that digital media has brought about.
More respect
needs to be given by trainers to the many (and sometimes predominant)
non-journalistic functions much of the digital media serve. This
partly means it is no longer enough for 'trainers' to only be composed
of media professionals.
Although the
costs of establishing and running digital media can be a small fraction
of that of conventional media, a steady income stream is a huge
challenge to digital media practitioners. Frequently, even the 'professional'
practitioners are forced to do many other things to keep food on
the table, which impacts the quality and the rate of development
of their digital publications. Yet grants and other such support
money is only available to very few of them, as is advertising income.
Training of digital media practitioners needs to include all these
realities, and examples of successful coping strategies. Training
on ethics should be a strong component of digital media training.
The relative lack of controls and the ease of digital media as well
as the easy possibility of anonymity mean some web publishers drift
towards character assassination and other socially harmful behavior.
My own
example(s):
I consider myself
a "professional blogger," not in the sense of blogging
being an occupation, but in the sense of the quality standards I
try to maintain. I principally run two blogs, African Agriculture
and Trade Africa. I began and continue them as supports for my agricultural/trade
consultancy. They have proven to be a very effective marketing tool
for my business by freely, professionally and regularly providing
information that my prospective clients can use. They also serve
to make me very well-informed on the issues I consult about. So
while blogging, I am also always picking up information which makes
me ever more of an "expert" in my fields of
consultancy. The blogs have led to many contacts which have resulted
in invitations to write articles, attend meetings and to actual
consultancies. They are like a digital business card that anyone
in the world can see. I like to think the quality of the blogs also
gives potential clients an indication of the attention to quality
with which I would do their jobs.
These two blogs
are quite easy to maintain because they are not composed of my thoughts
and writing, but merely aggregate articles from all over the world
on their respective subject areas. I estimate that updating them
takes up about 20% of my work time. I feature Google advertisements
on the blogs. They are a growing but very small source of revenue
which does not even cover the time I spend on updating them. But
because they merely serve a support function for other things, it
is not necessary that the blogs be incomecenters in their own right.
They pay for themselves indirectly through the many other business
benefits they make possible. Those benefits are quite considerable,
and I don't think it is an exaggeration to say that the consultancy
and trade I am now involved in grew directly out of the blogs.
I also more
casually run Zimbabwe Review, a blog of my own political commentary
on events in my homeland. I do it when I can. It has no advertising
and no obvious material benefits to me. I try to make it more than
just 'venting,' by contributing perspectives that go a little deeper
than is frequently covered by both pro and anti-government Zimbabwean
media. It has a small but respectable reach for a blog.
* Chido
Makunike, Journalist, African web entrepreneur and online writer,
Senegal
Download
full document
Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.
TOP
|