Back to Index
This article participates on the following special index pages:
2008 harmonised elections - Index of articles
environment: Equitable access to state media
Media Monitoring Project Zimbabwe (MMPZ)
Extracted from the MMPZ presentation to the Diplomatic Community
March 12, 2008
The Media Monitoring
Project (Zimbabwe) is greatly concerned that the ruling party has
effectively hijacked the public media ahead of the March 29th elections.
ZBC, the national public broadcaster, now behaves as if it is ZANU
PF's own private radio and television station in flagrant
violation of electoral and broadcasting laws.
This is being done at the expense of disseminating important electoral
information the public needs to make informed choices and to cast
their votes effectively in what is certain to be Zimbabwe's
most complicated plebiscite in its history.
This lack of adequate electoral information is likely to disenfranchise
many potential voters. There is no publicity campaign - no
effort by the public media or the Zimbabwe Electoral Commission
to meet their duty and mandate to inform the electorate adequately
about any electoral information. Instead, the public media is engaged
in a propaganda war, which romanticizes and promotes the ruling
party and denigrates its rivals.
The situation is made worse by the fact that just a few weeks before
polling, the Zimbabwe Electoral Commission (ZEC) has still not fulfilled
its legal mandate to ensure equitable and fair coverage of the election
contestants, especially in the public media. Although any correction
to this state of affairs will come too late to ensure that the media
environment can be described as being conducive to the staging of
a free and fair election, MMPZ has called on ZEC to put an end to
the intolerable bias1 demonstrated by ZBC and the government-controlled
Because government-controlled media institutions are funded by public
money and already massively dominate Zimbabwe's media landscape,
it is imperative they provide fair, balanced and equitable coverage
of all parties contesting the elections. But at present their grossly
biased coverage in favor of the ruling party constitutes a clear
violation of Zimbabwe's own electoral and broadcasting laws,
let alone the SADC guidelines2 on the holding of democratic elections,
to which Zimbabwe is a signatory.
For example, on Friday February 29th, all of ZBC's stations
abruptly suspended normal programming to provide live coverage of
ZANU PF's election manifesto launch, which, incredibly, lasted
for four hours. This coverage was preceded by what constitutes free
advertisements masquerading as news items for the ruling party on
ZBC radio's 6am-news bulletin of February 28th. In a so-called
news story, the station carried an announcement for senior ZANU-PF
cadres in Masvingo Province, advising them where to find transport
to bring them to Harare for the launch of the ruling party's
manifesto. This kind of service exclusively accorded to ZANU (PF),
is clearly in breach of Section 16F of the ZEC Act.
ZBC gave no live coverage to the launch of Simba Makoni's
presidential campaign in Bulawayo the following day, or to the launch
of the MDC campaign led by Morgan Tsvangirai in Sakubva the week
During the week ending Sunday 2nd March, ZTV devoted 64 minutes
of its news bulletins to reporting favourably on ZANU PF's
campaigns, compared to just three minutes given to the two MDC factions
and eight minutes to Makoni.
Such prominence given to the ruling party constitutes grossly inequitable,
unfair and partisan coverage of important election issues and essentially
reflects the way the national public broadcaster has been reporting
all election campaign activities.
MMPZ's preliminary findings on the national public broadcaster's
coverage of these elections reveal that between February 5th and
29th, ZTV accorded a total of three hours, 22 minutes to ZANU (PF)'s
electoral activities in its main news bulletins (7am, 6pm and 8pm).
In stark contrast, just nine minutes were allocated to the two MDC
formations and 26 minutes to independent presidential candidate
Makoni, while other political parties got four minutes. This coverage
comprised 93 stories devoted to the ruling party, 86 of them in
a positive light, (seven were neutral).
There were four
reports on the two MDC formations' activities, one positive,
one negative and two neutral. Fifteen stories were devoted to Makoni,
five of which were fair and the rest negative. The station aired
three stories on other smaller parties, two of which were favourable
because they involved a pro-ZANU (PF) party, the Zimbabwe Development
Party led by Kisnoti Mukwazhi.
ZBC radio stations followed a similar pattern. Spot FM (main news
bulletins, 7am, 1pm, 6pm and 8pm) devoted 50 stories to ZANU (PF),
all favourable. There were only two reports on the MDC's activities,
one favourable and one neutral. Radio Zimbabwe carried 68 stories
on the ruling party's activities. 67 of these clearly supported
the ruling party, while one was neutral. Only three reports were
on the MDC. Two of these were negative and one was neutral.
The government-controlled daily papers, which hold a national monopoly
over this market (as does ZBC over the airwaves), are performing
no better. Their coverage of the parties' campaign activities
in the week ending 2nd March for example, also reflected a heavy
bias towards the ruling party. Of the 51 stories they carried on
the election contestants, 31 favourably covered ZANU PF campaigns
while the remaining 20 were distributed among the electoral preparations
of the two MDC formations, Makoni and the other smaller opposition
parties. Nineteen of these portrayed a negative image of the parties
covered, the only exception being the launch of Makoni's campaign
in Bulawayo and Harare. The bias shown by the government media reinforces
the public demand that ZEC applies the laws governing media coverage
of elections, as well as to respond to calls to allow greater media
diversity in the coverage of elections.
It is against this background that MMPZ condemns the restrictive
condition imposed by ZEC that requires journalists seeking accreditation
to cover the joint elections to be first accredited by the Media
and Information Commission, which has yet to be reconstituted according
to amendments to the Access
to Information and Protection of Privacy Act gazetted into law
in January. As such, the MIC does not legally exist in its present
form and ZEC's regulation cannot have any force at law, especially
as the requirement cannot be met by journalists who are not already
Similarly, the extortionate application and accreditation fees for
all but locally accredited journalists recently announced by the
Minister of Information cannot be viewed as anything less than punitive
and is clearly designed to discourage international - and
even regional - media from covering the elections.
In addition, MMPZ considers the arbitrary ban imposed by MIC on
the well-known local journalist, Brian Hungwe, to be a wanton violation
of Zimbabweans' rights to free expression and a clear illustration
of the commission's repressive instincts. In its present state
the commission has no authority to make such decisions, although
its action exposes the real, restrictive intent of the law under
which the commission was constituted.
Amendments to AIPPA do nothing that practically reforms media laws
regulating journalistic activity in Zimbabwe. While, on the face
of it, journalistic practice has been decriminalized, this only
applies to freelance journalists; media institutions operating in
the country cannot employ any journalist who is not accredited and
therefore still risk heavy penalties, including closure (or expulsion)
if they do so, under the restrictive regulations of AIPPA.
ZEC's demand and the Media Commission's continuing control
over journalistic activity in the country clearly demonstrates the
Government's lack of political will in ensuring an open and
diverse media environment. These government institutions are making
a mockery of the country's laws - while the amendments
to AIPPA (and POSA)
are evidently an insincere gesture to give the appearance that government
is complying with SADC's electoral recommendations.
The national public broadcaster's illegal monopoly of the
airwaves3 and its continuing propagandist role for the ruling party
and its representatives provides overwhelming proof of this insincerity.
While it is too late to expect a media environment conducive to
effective media coverage of the coming elections, MMPZ believes
that ZEC should immediately put an end to the extreme bias and inequitable
coverage of the election participants in the public media and ensure
that they observe the provisions of Zimbabwe's electoral laws4.
There is no doubt that the government-controlled media are ignoring
requirements of the law. For example, while Section 16F(c) of the
Act demands that "a clear distinction is made in their
news media between factual reporting and editorial comment on it",
The Herald continues to mix the two as exemplified by its February
28th edition story entitled "Meet the people tour".
The story talks about Tsvangirai's visit to three high density
suburbs in Harare and includes what is clearly an opinion -
"He [Tsvangirai] said he had seen during the tour how people
were suffering because of the economic hardships, ironically caused
by the MDC, which urged the West to impose economic sanctions against
MMPZ has offered its research and monitoring services to the Commission
but to date no response has been received.
- See MMPZ
Weekly Media Update No. 2008-8
2.1.5 calls for equal opportunity for all political parties to
access the state media.
- The Supreme
Court struck down ZBC's monopoly of the airwaves in 2000
but to date, a de facto monopoly persists.
- Section 16G
of the Zimbabwe electoral Act says: (i) The Commission shall monitor
the Zimbabwean news media during any election period to ensure
that political parties, candidates, broadcasters, print publishers
and journalists observe the provisions of this Part.
Visit the MMPZ
Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.