THE NGO NETWORK ALLIANCE PROJECT - an online community for Zimbabwean activists  
 View archive by sector
 
 
    HOME THE PROJECT DIRECTORYJOINARCHIVESEARCH E:ACTIVISMBLOGSMSFREEDOM FONELINKS CONTACT US
 

 


Back to Index

BAZ decries restrictive broadcasting law as impediment to licensing new players
MISA-Zimbabwe
September 18, 2007

In a revealing and first time acknowledgment of the restrictive nature of the Broadcasting Services Act (BSA), the Broadcasting Authority of Zimbabwe (BAZ), says its hands are tied as no new broadcasting players can come into the scene under the present regulatory environment.

Giving evidence before the Portfolio Committee on Transport and Communications on Monday 17 August, BAZ Chief Executive Officer Obert Muganyura says the authority, set under the BSA, has failed to license new players as no potential private players can meet the "stringent criteria".

"We gave the projection that we would by this time have licensed new players on the understanding that the Broadcasting Services Act would have been amended but it has not yet", said the Muganyura to the Parliamentarians.

The stringent requirements in the BSA which Muganyura described as problematic include a ban on foreign funding and ownership, restrictions on the number of national free to air private broadcasters that can be licensed as well as the restrictions placed on ownership of frequency transmitters. The BSA provides that only the government owned company, Transmedia can own frequency transmitters and all new players have to line up to do business with Transmedia. As the situation stands in Zimbabwe, Transmedia is failing to provide adequate services to one TV station, the state owned Zimbabwe Television as well as to four FM radio stations, all owned by the state through the Zimbabwe Broadcasting Corporation.

MISA-Zimbabwe notes that the revelations by BAZ on the democratic deficiencies in the BSA as well as the political procrastination of the government in amending the BSA further points to the fact that the ruling party and its government are bent on maintaining their total grip on the broadcast media. Missing in the statement from BAZ is its total lack of independence to make decisions as its plays only a secretarial role to the Minister of Information and Publicity. Without an independent regulatory authority guaranteed by law, the job of the BAZ will remain at the whims of politicians.

The prevailing situation places Zimbabwe in a unique position in Southern Africa where it is the only country with a virtual state monopoly in broadcasting. It should be noted that the closure of broadcasting space to new players is a political decision and act meant to safeguard the interest of the ruling elite hence the defiance of expert advice and calls by citizens and civic society for the industry to be opened to new players. As Zimbabwe faces elections next year, it should become clear to all that no democratic free and fair elections can be held in an environment where only one political party has access to the broadcasts media.

Visit the MISA-Zimbabwe fact sheet

 

Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.

TOP