|
Back to Index
International
relations
Media
Monitoring Project Zimbabwe (MMPZ)
Extracted from Weekly Media Update 2007-34
Monday August 27th - Sunday September 2nd 2007
September 06, 2007
Government media provided
only superficial coverage of the root causes of Zimbabwe's
uneasy relations with the international community and other related
developments in 107 stories they carried on the topic in the week
(ZBC [64] and government papers [43]). This was most evident in
their treatment of MDC faction leader Morgan Tsvangirai's
trip to Australia. There was no coherent discussion on the nature
and agenda of the visit. The government Press especially, reported
news only in the context of government's perception of Tsvangirai
as a traitor who was plotting with Western countries to 'illegally'
oust the ZANU PF government. No concrete evidence was provided supporting
such conspiracies. As a result, none of their audiences got to know
what exactly happened in Australia.
The Herald and Chronicle
(28/8), for instance, sarcastically presented Tsvangirai as having
gone to Australia to celebrate "the hurting sanctions that
Australia and other Western countries have imposed against Zimbabwe".
In this light they reported him as telling "more than 100
people" at the Australian Institute of International Affairs
of his "admiration" for the Canberra authorities for
moving "far ahead of other countries in ensuring that at least
pressure is applied through multilateral interventions". Notably,
there was no attribution to where the papers had sourced the comments
since there was no indication that their reporters were reporting
from Australia.
Neither did the papers
provide evidence for their claims that Tsvangirai had gone to Australia
to link up with his ex-Rhodesian financiers, nor spell out exactly
how the trip undermined South African President Thabo Mbeki's
initiative to find a negotiated internal settlement.
ZBC covered the development
poorly too, with ZTV (31/8,6PM) and Spot FM (31/8, 8pm) merely amplifying
government Press accusations by accessing commentators who poured
more scorn on Tsvangirai's alleged underhand actions. For
example, they quoted Goodwills Masimirembwa "condemning"
the opposition leader's action as "unnecessary considering
that he is going to seek votes from the people affected by the sanctions".
Neither ZBC nor its print counterparts sought comment from the MDC.
While the government
media saw conspiracies in Tsvangirai's trip, they exaggerated
the alleged support government was getting from the region, especially
from South Africa and Equatorial Guinea. For example, in a story
next to that accusing Tsvangirai of "applauding sanctions
against Zimbabwe", The Herald (28/8) oversimplified Mbeki's
views on Zimbabwe expressed in his weekly letter in the ANC Today
by portraying his support for the people of Zimbabwe to mean support
for government and its economic policies. It was in this context
that the paper suffocated the corrective measures that Zimbabwe
needed to implement to recover from its economic crisis contained
in a report compiled by the ANC's secretariat.
In fact, such was ZBC's
preoccupation with building the government's image, that 61
of the 64 stories it carried on international relations projected
the government as enjoying widespread local and regional support.
However, none of its stories provided any informed analysis of such
support. For example, there was no critical assessment on the visit
to Zimbabwe by Equatorial Guinea President Teodoro Obiang Nguema
to open the Harare Agricultural Show, except as another demonstration
of Zimbabwe's growing support despite Western machinations
to isolate the country. The official Press adopted a similar approach.
For example, The Herald (29/8) approvingly reported on how Nguema
had been given a 21-gun salute, "the highest honour that can
be given by a nation", without even attempting to question
the appropriateness of his presence, considering the political culture
in his country.
Although the government
media's sourcing patterns appeared diverse (Figs 1 & 2),
their coverage remained lopsided as most of the voices outside government
were either quoted in the context of endorsing Mugabe and his government
or narrowly blaming the West and its alleged surrogate, the MDC,
for the country's problems.
Fig 1: Voice
Distribution on ZBC
Government |
Foreign
dignitaries |
Alternative |
War
veterans |
Traditional
leaders |
Business |
45 |
28 |
6 |
1 |
1 |
5 |
Fig 2: Voice
distribution in the government-controlled press
Govt |
Foreign |
MDC |
Unnamed |
Local
govt |
Zanu
PF |
Business |
War
veterans |
21 |
28 |
8 |
5 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
Notably, all
the MDC voices were presented in bad light.
The private media also
barely did justice to Tsvangirai's trip to Australia. They
just carried five piecemeal reports that dismally failed to interrogate
the essence of the visit.
However, they carried
51 reports (private electronic media [30] and private Press [21])
that exposed growing international alienation of government over
its questionable policies. For instance, The Financial Gazette,
SW Radio Africa (30/8) and Zimdaily (1/9) reported that the Czech
Republic was closing its embassy in Zimbabwe citing "crazy"
policies by the government, saying that any further activities of
the Czech embassy "would not be effective".
At the weekend, The Standard
(2/9) reported that Britain would maintain its policy on Zimbabwe
despite the replacement of Prime Minister Tony Blair with Gordon
Brown. The paper quoted embassy official Gillian Dare saying, "If
Harare thought Britain would soften its stance" following
Brown's appointment, it was "mistaken". Dare said
good relations with Harare depended on the implementation of sound
political and economic reforms. Earlier, SW Radio Africa (31/8)
(and buried in the business section of The Standard) cited a story
in the British-based Daily Telegraph claiming China had shifted
its policy on Zimbabwe. Reportedly, China - the hinge of government's
"Look East" policy - "was dropping all assistance
except humanitarian aid" as it chose to "work more closely
with the international community in bringing pressure to bear on
'rogue regimes'".
The private media also
critically analysed the SADC secretariat's economic report
on Zimbabwe. The Gazette, for example, argued that the secretariat's
criticism of Mugabe's style of management was now not so different
from those of his Western critics, saying: "(It) could have
been a cut-and-paste job from an International Monetary Fund report".
The sourcing patterns
of the private media are shown in Figs 3 &4.
Fig 3: Voice
Distribution of the private electronic media
Government |
Foreign
diplomats |
Alternative |
War
veterans |
MDC |
3 |
8 |
6 |
1 |
12 |
Notably, the
voice of the MDC dominated the private electronic media's
sourcing patterns.
Fig 4: Voice
distribution in the private press
Govt |
Foreign
diplomats |
MDC |
Alternative |
Unnamed |
1 |
15 |
4 |
2 |
4 |
Visit the MMPZ
fact
sheet
Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.
TOP
|