|
Back to Index
Agriculture
and food security
Media
Monitoring Project Zimbabwe (MMPZ)
Extracted from Weekly Media Update 2007-31
Monday August 6th 2007 - Sunday August 12th 2007
August 16, 2007
ZIMBABWE'S
food security situation was a popular topic for the media during
the week. However none of them adequately examined the precarious
nature of this matter.
Except for a
Famine Early Warning Systems Network (Fewsnet) report on Studio
7, none of the 75 reports the media devoted to the topic -
ZBC [33], government papers [22], the private electronic media [five]
and private Press [15] - comprehensively audited Zimbabwe's
food requirements and deficits. As a result, their audiences remained
ignorant about how much grain had been delivered to the Grain Marketing
Board, what percentage of national requirements this constituted,
and how government planned to offset any shortfalls. Most of the
official media's stories passively recorded official pronouncements
glossing over the unstable food situation.
It was in this
context that The Herald's follow-up (8/8) to revelations in
The Sunday Mail (5/8) that this year's wheat farming season
was a disaster simply reiterated government excuses on the projected
record low crop without testing their truthfulness. For example,
the paper just quoted the Zimbabwe Electricity Supply Authority
(ZESA) boss, Ben Rafemoyo, "partially" accepting blame
for the low yields on the basis that ZESA had failed to fulfil its
promise to provide adequate power to farmers. It did not ask him
why ZESA had failed to do so when it had subjected urban residents
to extensive power cuts on the specific pretext that it was prioritizing
wheat production. There was equally no clarity on the exact amount
of grain Zimbabwe had in its silos.
The Herald and
Chronicle (8/8), for example, just announced that Zimbabwe was negotiating
with several countries in the region as it "intensifies efforts
to improve the reserves capacity" without discussing the country's
grain shortfall. Neither did they seek clarification from GMB CEO
Samuel Muvuti on the matter. They just quoted him vaguely saying
the country would import 400,000 tonnes of maize from Malawi and
was "currently relying on . . . maize imported early this
year" although this did not mean Zimbabwe was "empty"
and "had no locally produced maize". He was not asked
how much the country had actually produced and how much of that
had been received by the GMB.
Such passive
reportage also typified ZTV's coverage (8/8, 7am). It reported
Muvuti dismissing "speculation that the country's (grain)
reserves were only enough for two weeks", adding that "the
current shortages" were "being caused by other factors".
Muvuti was never asked what these factors were, nor was the source
of the speculation explained. However, The Herald (8/8) did quote
him stating that a GMB survey showed that some farmers still had
maize but could not deliver due to transport problems, adding that
the current maize meal shortage was only a result of the imbalance
between the high cost of packaging and the government stipulated
maize meal price. Again, his claims were not verified. Earlier,
Spot FM (7/8, 8pm) also presented the grain shortages as simply
stemming from the parastatal's inability to distribute "imported
maize and excess grain from farmers" in a timely manner.
The government
media also avoided analyzing the confusion surrounding the authorities'
position on white commercial farmers. For example, while Spot FM
(6/8, 8pm) reported Lands Minister Didymus Mutasa and analyst Noah
Mangondo disputing that government had chased away white commercial
farmers, The Herald (8/8) reported Mutasa's ministry and Mashonaland
East Governor Ray Kaukonde as agitating for the arrest of white
farmers for allegedly resisting eviction. The paper, for example,
cited Kaukonde claiming that "the crackdown on these errant
farmers had long been overdue" because there was "evidence
that some of the evicted farmers deliberately sabotaged the agrarian
reform programme".
The truth of
these claims remained untested. Instead, the official media carried
several reports that simplistically depicted government as working
tirelessly to ensure increased agricultural productivity in the
coming farming season. For example, ZTV (6/8,8pm) quoted Local Government
Minister Ignatius Chombo declaring, without any substantiation,
that Zimbabwe will "regain its bread basket status in the
region following the government's agricultural mechanization
programme". The Herald (8/8) also carried a similar report.
Despite their
seemingly balanced voice sourcing patterns (Figs 1 and 2), the government
media's coverage of Zimbabwe's food security remained
superficial.
Fig 1 Voice
distribution on ZBC
Farmers'
Organisations |
Farmers
|
Alternative |
Govt |
2 |
6 |
8 |
11 |
Fig 2 Voice
distribution in the government Press
Govt |
Farmers |
Alternative |
Business |
Zanu
PF |
Unnamed |
12 |
12 |
1 |
3 |
3 |
2 |
Studio 7 however,
exposed the grim realities facing the country. The station's
report (6/8) revealed that although there was a serious shortage
of maize and the "GMB was having a difficult time convincing
farmers to sell their maize", the government was still "reluctant
to launch an international appeal for food". In a follow-up
to this story, the radio reported (10/8) Fewsnet as having issued
an upgraded warning on Zimbabwe's food security situation,
calling it an "emergency". It cited the economic crisis,
poor harvests and the "dramatic" impact of government's
recent price-control campaign on the availability of food in the
country, as well as restrictions on imports of basic commodities
as having worsened the crisis. Fewsnet was also reported to have
warned that "cereal harvests this year would meet just 55
percent of national needs", noting that GMB had only "received
just 70,000 metric tonnes of maize from domestic sources since the
recent harvest, plus 115,000 tonnes" of the 400,000 imported
from Malawi.
The private
media traced declining agricultural production to government policies.
For example,
the Zimbabwe Independent (10/8) reported farming experts noting
that although ZESA had contributed to projected poor wheat yields,
"falling agricultural productivity was a combination of government
blunders and other factors such as the shrinkage of hectarage planted
each year, poor planning, lack of confidence and financing, and
unavailability of fuel and other inputs." The paper also attributed
low production to legislative changes, which it said had brought
about "uncertainty of tenure." In addition, the private
media recorded three incidents of forced evictions of white commercial
farmers, their workers and newly resettled farmers in Masvingo and
Matebeleland North.
Earlier, The
Financial Gazette and The Zimbabwe Times (9/8) quoted the Commercial
Farmers' Union denying government claims that white farmers
were resisting eviction, saying they were waiting for the outcome
of their applications for land lodged with government.
The private
media's sourcing pattern is reflected in Fig 3.
Fig. 3 Voice
distribution in the private Press
Govt |
Business |
Farmers |
Ordinary
people |
Lawyer |
Unnamed |
War
veterans |
Foreign |
3 |
1 |
4 |
2 |
1 |
4 |
1 |
1 |
Visit the MMPZ
fact
sheet
Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.
TOP
|