|
Back to Index
Political
developments
Media Monitoring Project Zimbabwe (MMPZ)
Weekly Media Update 2007-11
Monday March 19th – Sunday March 25th 2007
DURING the week
the official media distorted and censored news stories and used
editorials to drown regional and international concerns about government’s
crackdown on the MDC leadership and the general deterioration in
Zimbabwe’s human rights record.
Almost all the
187 stories they carried on the matter (ZBC [61] and government
papers [126]) accused government’s critics of employing double standards
in their criticism of government actions while ignoring the MDC’s
alleged "orgies of violence", which they claimed, were
part of the West’s machinations to overthrow government using a
surrogate opposition. To buttress this slant, they selectively amplified
sympathetic statements by prominent Africans, such as former Zambian
presidents Frederick Chiluba and Kenneth Kaunda, criticising Western
countries for being hypocritical in their dealings with Zimbabwe
while blacking out expressions of concern by other important regional
figures. For example, they censored condemnation of the country’s
deteriorating political crisis by Zambian President Levy Mwanawasa,
SA opposition parties, the African Union and SADC NGOs, among a
chorus of other disapproving voices.
In addition,
the official media censored news of the nationwide crackdown on
opposition, civic and labour leaders and civilians by state security
agents while simultaneously magnifying cases of alleged MDC violence,
which they linked to the West. For example, these media reported
the alleged petrol bombing of a Mutare police station and a passenger
train by "suspected MDC activists" as
politically motivated, but presented the brutal beating of the MDC’s
Nelson Chamisa by suspected state security agents at Harare International
Airport while on his way to an ACP-EU meeting as a common act of
mugging.
In the same
vein, the official media attempted to justify the heavy-handed manner
in which police barred MDC officials Grace Kwinjeh and Sekai Holland
(both brutally beaten by the police in detention following the foiled
Save
Zimbabwe Campaign rally) from flying to South Africa for medical
attention by presenting them as fugitives from justice.
It was in this
light that The Herald and Chronicle (20/3) and
Spot FM (20/3, 1pm) made no attempt to investigate the
context in which local Western ambassadors had allegedly offered
support to the opposition victims of police brutality and how they
had violated the Vienna Convention as claimed by government. They
simply reported Foreign Affairs Minister Simbarashe Mumbengegwi
accusing the diplomats of engaging in "politically-motivated
actions calculated to generate cheap propaganda",
which was "tantamount to unwarranted political
interference". The briefing followed President
Mugabe’s instruction to the minister to summon the diplomats and
"read the riot act to them".
Neither did they seek comment from US ambassador, Christopher Dell,
on the reason why he had walked out of the ‘briefing’
except to speculate that it was meant to "incite
other ambassadors" to do the same.
Otherwise, the
government media passively justified, and even encouraged, more
state repression against the opposition on the basis of its unproven
links with the West’s alleged regime change agenda. They carried
several comments ranging from the Presidium, Cabinet ministers,
war veterans and ordinary members of ZANU PF accusing the West and
its MDC "stooges" for the country’s
problems.
ZTV (23/3, 8pm),
for example, reported President Mugabe alleging that the MDC "was
formed to wrestle power from ZANU PF to further the interest of
the former coloniser (Britain)", adding that
opposition activists had been paid between US$10,000 and $60,000
to launch a campaign of violence in the country.
No evidence
for this was given.
Earlier (22/3),
The Herald’s Caesar Zvayi maintained – despite previous
denials by both Dell and the MDC – that the alleged violence by
the opposition party followed a strategic meeting the two parties
held "two months ago". In addition,
Zvayi tried to divert attention from the police’s fatal shooting
of MDC activist Gift Tandare by presenting the activist, including
the late MDC spokesman, Learnmore Jongwe, as personifications of
‘unruliness’ in the opposition party.
ZBC’s one-sided
handling of the topic was reflected in its sourcing pattern as shown
in Fig 1.
Fig
1 Voice distribution on ZBH
| ZANU
PF |
Govt |
Foreign
Diplomats |
Alternative |
Police |
War
Veterans |
| 10 |
31 |
10 |
1 |
9 |
5 |
Notably, all those accused
of fanning the political crisis in Zimbabwe, such as the MDC and
the West, were not given the right of reply. The broadcaster basically
gave space only to those diplomats making favourable comments about
the country.
Although the
government papers' voice distribution appeared diverse (Fig
2), their stories remained unbalanced because almost all their sources
were used in the context of vilifying the West and the opposition.
Fig. 2 Voice distribution in the government Press
| MDC |
Foreign |
Alternative |
Lawyer |
Govt |
ZANU
PF |
Ordinary
People |
| 14 |
19 |
12 |
3 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
Fig.
4 Voice distribution in the private Press
| Govt |
MDC |
Foreign |
Police |
Unnamed |
Media |
Ordinary
People |
Army |
| 4 |
14 |
25 |
3 |
15 |
1 |
3 |
2 |
Visit the MMPZ
fact
sheet
Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.
TOP
|