|
Back to Index
Online
agencies disregarding elementary journalistic standards
Media Monitoring Project Zimbabwe (MMPZ)
Extracted from Weekly
Media Update 2000 – 4
Monday January 29th 2007 – Sunday February 4th 2007
Although the foreign-based
media and online agencies have become vital sources of alternative
information to some Zimbabweans, they often compromise their credibility
by disregarding elementary journalistic standards.
New Zimbabwe.com’s
story (2/2), Mugabe’s guards in open rebellion, is a case in
point.
The agency
alleged that 23 soldiers "attached to the Presidential
Guard (PG)" were "arrested and detained
after they sprayed" the State House "with
bullets" on January 29th protesting against low salaries.
Reportedly,
the arrest of the soldiers – "all of them graduates from
the Border Gezi National Youth Service" – followed
an earlier shooting to death of 30 horses by other "50 (PG)
soldiers" at Inkomo Barracks who then "disappeared
with an assortment of AK 47 assault and FN rifles".
Except for Defence
Minister Sydney Sekeremayi who refused to comment on the matter
on the basis that he does "not talk to the media",
the story relied on unnamed sources and lacked any evidence
to substantiate its extraordinary claims.
In another case,
Studio 7 (1/2) simply quoted an official from the Morgan Tsvangirai-led
MDC faction claiming that about 3,000 Bulawayo residents participated
in the party’s demonstration against the synchronisation of elections
in 2010. The station allowed these inflated figures to pass as fact
without any effort to seek independent corroboration.
The Zimbabwean
(1/2) also passively reported unnamed sources claiming – without
a shred of evidence – that the doctors’ strike had resulted in the
death of 60,000 people in six weeks. How they arrived at this figure
was simply ignored.
These
media are fortunate they operate outside the repressive media laws
that suffocate free expression in Zimbabwe, but it should not be
an excuse to abandon basic journalistic standards of providing credible
- and where possible – identifiable sources for the information
they disseminate. Publishing stories without any attempt to provide
credible verification of the source for the information conveyed
reduces the quality of that information to rumour and speculation
- and damages the authority and credibility of the media organisation
responsible for disseminating it. Information that cannot be reasonably
corroborated should not, generally, see the light of day.
It is regrettable
that such unprofessional journalism provides the authorities with
an excuse to retain their repressive media laws, which they have
used to muzzle the private media and stifle the establishment of
alternative sources of news.
Despite these
professional lapses however, the private radio stations and online
agencies have continued to expose the country’s deteriorating human
rights situation.
This week they
carried 14 stories on rights violations. Of these, eight were new
incidents while the remainder were either follow-ups of previous
cases, or general discussions on the country’s poor human rights
record.
The incidents
included the arrest of MDC supporters, civic activists and striking
nurses and the harassment of teachers’ representatives by security
agents.
The government
media ignored most of the cases, only reported on the arrest of
four nurses over allegations that they tried to incite their colleagues
to join the health workers’ strike.
Even then, they
treated the matter as normal.
Visit the MMPZ
fact
sheet
Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.
TOP
|