|
Back to Index
Economic
meltdown
Media
Monitoring Project Zimbabwe (MMPZ)
Weekly
Media Update 2006-50
Monday December 11th 2006 – Sunday December 17th
2006
AS the year ended, there
appeared no marked difference in the way the government media covered
crucial national issues. Their coverage of the country’s economic
meltdown, the most topical issue in all media during the year, demonstrates
this point.
They continued suffocating
alternative voices while passively promoting government views, even
when these official pronouncements were mostly half-truths and at
variance with reality.
For example, this week
the official media projected a sanitized picture of the country’s
economic problems in the 46 stories they carried [ZBC (25) and government
Press (21)] on the subject. They largely interpreted the crisis
through the lens of the authorities (see Fig 1).
Fig. 1 Voice distribution
in the official Press
| Govt |
Alternative |
Business |
Ordinary
People |
Judiciary |
Unnamed |
| 9 |
2 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
As a result, only
the authorities’ perception of the country’s economic outlook filtered
through these media at the expense of alternative views.
In contrast,
the private media were forthright on the poor state of the economy
in the 46 stories they carried on the topic during the week. Of
these 33 appeared in the private Press while the private electronic
media carried 13. Almost all their stories exposed the extent of
the country's economic rot, which they attributed to government's
poor policies. The scenario replayed itself throughout the year.
For example, during the year MMPZ carried 50 updates on topical
issues in the media, 35 of which included the topic relating to
economic issues. The government media carried 3,081 of the stories
while the private media had 2 502 reports.
But as in the week, the
official media's treatment of the subject did not reflect
an informed analysis of the country's economic difficulties.
Their stories were largely piecemeal and avoided addressing the
question of official economic mismanagement.
In fact, they narrowly
blamed all those outside government, particularly the West and "unscrupulous"
businesses, for the economic mess, characterised by hyperinflation,
low production, unemployment and the galloping cost of living and
severe commodity and foreign currency shortages.
Instead of discussing
these issues in the context of government's policy deficiencies,
they simply depicted the authorities as working tirelessly to arrest
the decline through government programmes such as the fiscal and
monetary policies, the National Economic Development Priority Programme
and other ad-hoc interventionist measures.
The passive manner in
which the official media tackled the economic issues throughout
the year is illustrated by the dominance of official comments in
their stories.
Notably, most of the
alternative voices were reported in the context of endorsing government
economic policies while ordinary people's concerns on the
economic decline were unexplored. The same trend replicated itself
on ZBC.
Only the private
media were critical as seen by their use of alternative voices to
test the relevance and prudence of government's economic programmes
throughout the year.
View MMPZ's
fact
sheet
Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.
TOP
|