|
Back to Index
Inadequate
news coverage
Media Monitoring Project Zimbabwe (MMPZ)
Weekly Media Update 2006-29
Monday July 17th 2006
- Sunday July 24th 2006
THE information gap created by the country’s
restrictive media environment was illustrated this week by the manner
in which the media handled the doctors’ strike, intensifying power
cuts, discussions on local currency reforms, human rights violations
and debate on Benjamin Mkapa’s efforts to resolve Zimbabwe’s crisis.
While the government media gave these
important stories superficial coverage or ignored them, the private
media, especially the niche market private radio stations and online
agencies, openly discussed these issues.
(a) Doctors’ strike
THE government papers initially
censored news of the junior doctors’ strike when it broke out and
only reported about it days later during the week. They carried
25 stories on the subject, 15 of which appeared in the official
press while the remaining 10 were aired on ZBH.
However, despite this seemingly significant
coverage of the strike and related health issues, the stories were
scarcely informative. They did not fully explain the causes of the
strike, its extent or its effects on Zimbabwe’s ailing health system.
Instead, the stories were largely premised
on officials’ condemnation of the industrial action and their rhetoric
on how they were working vigorously to improve health service delivery.
Notably, these claims were not reconciled with the situation on
the ground, especially in light of the serious shortages of medical
staff and drugs, or balanced with alternative views.
For example, only one story out of the
15 stories the government Press carried featured both the government
and the doctors’ standpoints on the strike. Otherwise, the rest
basically presented the doctors as an ungrateful and insensitive
lot.
They also tried to downplay the strike
by presenting it as inconsequential. For example, The Herald (17/7)
contended that surveys it conducted "…showed that while
the strike had affected central hospitals, operations were going
on as usual with senior doctors attending to patients".
In fact, the papers (22/7) misleadingly
reported some of the striking doctors as having returned to work
after government had "increased their vehicle loans
from $50 million to $2billion and basic salaries".
No confirmation was sought from the doctors.
The Mirror stable was equally superficial
in its coverage of the strike in all its five stories on the matter,
despite its occasional disclosures of the suffering caused to patients
by the job boycott.
Its slant was epitomised by The Daily
Mirror story (18/7); Doctors’ pride affects patients, which narrowly
attributed the strike to doctors’ alleged self-importance and avoided
a frank discussion of the problem.
While the Zimbabwe Independent (21/7)
highlighted the contents of a letter the doctors had allegedly written
to President Mugabe stating their grievances, The Standard and The
Financial Gazette completely ignored the strike.
A more informative and balanced perspective
appeared on Studio 7 (18-20/7), Newzimbabwe.com (19/7), zimdaily.com
(19& 20/7) and Zim Online (19/7). Their seven stories explained
the reasons behind the strike and its adverse effects on the country’s
health delivery system.
(b) Power shortages
THIS week the media generally
failed to inform their audiences on the reasons for worsening power
cuts imposed by the Zimbabwe Electricity Supply Authority (ZESA).
The government media, for example, passively
rehashed official pronouncements that sought to attribute the problem
to vandalism of power infrastructure by illegal copper dealers.
For instance, almost half of The Herald’s
eight stories on the subject peddled this perception and even extended
it to Kinshasa, the capital of the DRC by the beginning of the following
week (24/7) warning of longer and more frequent power outages.
Apart from the Mirror papers, the rest
of the private media remained reticent on the subject.
For example, The Daily Mirror (20/7)
reported ZESA’s new power tariffs and questioned the logic of the
hikes at a time when the utility’s service delivery had deteriorated
(21/7).
However, like the rest of the media,
the Mirror stable have still not audited the full extent of the
losses suffered by business and industry, let alone the suffering
of residents as a result of the worsening power cuts. Nor has the
extraordinary mystery surrounding the closure of the three thermal
power stations of Harare, Bulawayo and Munyati been adequately explained.
For example, for how long has the country
been without their contribution to the energy grid, and now that
the RBZ has "bailed out" ZESA, when are they likely to
be back in service and what difference will this make?
(c) Local currency issues
Those who rely on the government
media for information also remained in the dark on the search for
a viable solution to Zimbabwe’s financial transactions nightmare,
caused by the hyperinflationary environment.
These media seemed uninterested in joining
the discussion, offset by revelations in private papers.
For example, only readers of private
publications learnt about how the proliferation of zeroes on the
country’s currency was making it impossible to "store
and process information" as "the software
cannot support 11 digit figures" (The Financial Gazette
[20/7] and Independent [21/7]). Government officials and economists
were reported confirming the development.
In fact, the Independent reported businesses
as having proposed that government slash three zeroes on local dollar
transactions and consolidate the dollar’s value as "kilo dollars"
for easier transactions, while The Daily Mirror (22/7) quoted Reserve
Bank Governor Gideon Gono apparently agreeing, saying he was "consulting"
over the issue, which he described as "urgent".
d) Political developments
Again only the private media covered
the debate on efforts by former Tanzanian leader Benjamin Mkapa to
find a solution to the country’s deepening crisis.
They carried 11 stories on the topic,
nine of which were carried by private radio stations and online
agencies, while the private papers only featured two.
Even so, the Zimbabwe Independent’s story
belied official claims for the withdrawal of UN Secretary-General
Kofi Annan from mediating in the Zimbabwe crisis. It quoted his
press officer Yves Sokorobi denying Annan had shelved his mediation
because he was an "African" who did not
want his name tarnished by a "bilateral dispute"
between Zimbabwe and Britain.
Earlier, The Financial Gazette (20/7)
quoted France and the US dismissing government’s claims that the
country’s problems stemmed from a bilateral dispute over land reforms.
Both countries actually urged Zimbabweans to first engage in political
dialogue among themselves to resolve the crisis before seeking "rapprochement
with foreigners".
Studio 7 (20/7) carried a similar report.
However, it did not reconcile claims
by acting Information Minister Paul Mangwana that Mkapa’s mission
had been arranged under the auspices of SADC with its earlier report
(2/6) in which late Information Minister Tichaona Jokonya stated
that the initiative was Zimbabwean.
All private radio stations and online
agencies (20-21/7) also reported the meeting between MDC leader
Morgan Tsvangirai and SADC chairman Festus Mogae, in an effort to
disprove Mugabe’s misrepresentation of the causes for Zimbabwe’s
woes.
The government media’s audiences only
learnt of the meeting when Herald columnist Nathaniel Manheru attempted
to dismiss it as irrelevant (22/7).
Visit the MMPZ fact
sheet
Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.
TOP
|