|
Back to Index
International
relations
Media Monitoring Project Zimbabwe (MMPZ)
Weekly Media Update 2006-22
Monday
May 29th 2006 – Sunday June 4th 2006
WHILE the private
Press continued to follow-up on international efforts to find a
solution to Zimbabwe’s political and economic crisis, the government
papers basically censored the developments.
Instead, they
concentrated on projecting Zimbabwe as enjoying good relations with
the rest of the world. For example, only one out of the 15 stories
the papers published on international relations was on the proposed
visit by UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan, aimed at finding a solution
to the Zimbabwean problem. ZBH ignored the issue altogether.
The story, carried
by The Herald (2/6), muddled the essence of the expected visit.
It merely reported Foreign Affairs Deputy Minister Obert Matshalaga
saying that the invitation extended by government to Annan to assess
last year’s clean-up operation and its aftermath "still stands
although it might be no longer relevant for him to take it up now".
No attempt was
made to relate this observation with the previous week’s comments
by Secretary for Information George Charamba that the UN chief’s
visit had gone "stale".
Otherwise the
rest of the stories glossed over growing international pressure
on Harare by celebrating the alleged support Zimbabwe enjoyed from
Asian and African governments such as China and Equatorial Guinea.
The official
media largely ignored alternative comments in its coverage of the
topic. See Fig 1.
Fig. 1 Voice
distribution in Government papers
|
Government
|
Foreign
|
MDC
|
Zanu-
PF
|
|
13
|
12
|
1
|
1
|
In contrast,
the private media provided more useful information on the matter
in 13 stories they carried on international relations.
The Daily Mirror
and Financial Gazette (1/6) reported Annan as still determined to
come despite government’s discomfort. The Gazette even claimed that
the expected UN-brokered intervention would reportedly include "an
exit scheme" for President Mugabe.
However, the
private media failed to fully establish the exact government position
on the UN chief’s invitation. While The Daily Mirror (1/6) quoted
Charamba reiterating his stance that the invitation had "fallen
away", the next day the Zimbabwe Independent (2/6) reported
Information Minister Tichaona Jokonya as telling the Voice of America
that Annan was "still welcome to come".
In fact, the
Independent revealed that the standoff between the UN and government
over the invitation had escalated during the week with the world
body "recalling its envoy to Harare for consultations".
Moreover, the
paper reported on growing official disquiet in South Africa over
the Zimbabwe crisis, which that country’s Vice President Phumzile
Mlambo-Ngcuka reportedly suggested, "had to be solved urgently".
By the weekend,
The Standard (4/6) revealed that following last week’s meeting between
President Mugabe and members of the clergy, EU diplomats had subsequently
"rebuffed attempts" by the "pro-ZANU PF clergy to
broker a peace pact between Mugabe, the EU and the United States".
The paper quoted the diplomats saying as far as they were concerned
they were "awaiting the outcome of a visit by Annan".
The paper also
quoted Archbishop Pius Ncube dismissing the clergy’s efforts to
resolve the crisis, alleging the group was pro-ZANU PF and beneficiaries
of government’s land reforms. The paper did not ask Ncube to substantiate
his claims.
Fig. 2 shows
that the private papers relied mostly on foreign diplomatic opinion.
Fig. 2 Voice
distribution in the private Press
|
Government
|
Foreign
|
Alternative
|
Unnamed
|
|
6
|
16
|
8
|
4
|
Visit the MMPZ
fact sheet
Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.
TOP
|