| |
Back to Index
A
legacy of censorship and closure
Comment,
The Zimbabwe Independent
May 05, 2006
http://www.theindependent.co.zw/viewinfo.cfm?linkid=20&id=1937
ZIMBABWE celebrated
World Press Freedom Day on Wednesday by closing the Bulawayo Press Club
to the United States ambassador because his views on Zimbabwe’s crisis
might have contradicted those of the regime.
The previous day two Botswana television staff were charged with evading
immigration controls and "practising journalism without accreditation".
They were following up a foot-and-mouth outbreak story.
A week earlier an Australian journalist covering Hifa had been given 24
hours to leave the country because his accreditation papers were not in
order.
US ambassador Christopher Dell was due to address journalists on issues
relating to press freedom and governance. This was the topic of his address
at Nust earlier on Wednesday. He made the point that economies develop
where there is a free trade in ideas. Famines occur in societies where
there is a muzzled media.
This is particularly pertinent as Zimbabwe faces extensive food shortages
at a time when the press has been emasculated by a regime mouthing nationalist
mantras about land and sovereignty but hiding from the truth — that its
policies have spawned unemployment, poverty and decay.
"The best test of truth," US Chief Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes
remarked, "is the power of thought to get itself accepted in the
competition of the market."
Zimbabwe’s rulers are frightened of that competition. They have closed
down newspapers whose views — liked Dell’s — proved unpalatable. This
enables their monopoly of the daily press and broadcasting to thrive amidst
the devastation their policies have wrought. And they lie about its causes.
"Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression,"
the Universal Declaration of Human Rights says. That includes the "freedom
to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart
information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers".
What is the situation in Zimbabwe? Only those accredited with a state-appointed
media commission — virulently hostile to a free press — are permitted
to impart ideas. And that commission interferes regularly with newspapers
whose opinions offend those in power.
There has even been a fiction propagated that Zimbabwe’s draconian measures
promulgated in 2002 match those of Sweden or pale in comparison with the
US Patriot Act and Britain’s anti-terrorist legislation.
Sweden exposed that attempted deception by inviting journalists to see
for themselves. And any visitor to the US or UK would realise immediately
that the media in those countries are sharply critical of their governments.
Even in the Sadc states, where President Mugabe finds kindred spirits,
there is greater freedom of expression and impressive economic growth.
Only Zimbabwe has gone backwards and a captive government press must take
responsibility for its betrayal of the promise of 1980.
Meanwhile, those responsible for a series of bombings at the premises
of the Daily News and Voice of the People radio go unpunished — and, by
the look of it, unsought. This is a regime where the president’s officials
view their role as threatening independent papers rather than attending
to their employer’s tattered image. President Mugabe has initiated a raft
of legislative provisions protecting him from incisive comment while he
feels free to abuse his critics without constraint. The courts have in
many cases failed to uphold the liberties they are charged to protect.
The public media has been privatised by the ruling party which abuses
its control by dissembling about the crisis besetting the nation and settling
scores with the opposition. Worse still, ideas that could rescue the country
from the economic morass the state has created are ignored.
Freedom of expression is fundamental to the protection of other freedoms.
So long as Zimbabweans hear only one voice across the land they are unable
to make informed electoral choices. They need a free press to learn what
options are available to them as they seek to find an escape route from
tyranny and penury which represent the pervasive legacy of totalitarian
control, censorship and closure.
Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.
TOP
|