|
Back to Index
Equal participation in decision-making builds great nations
Nyasha
Nyakunu, MISA-Zimbabwe
Extracted from Monthly Alerts Digest March 2006
April 06, 2006
Many a times
I have wished I was a fly on the wall during meetings of our doctorate-
endowed Cabinet. I am sure I am not the only Zimbabwean who has
at one time or the other wished for the same.
This wish arises
from my frustration and failure to comprehend the deliberations
and discussions that inform the decisions that emanate from that
eminent office much to the chagrin and embarrassment of even those
who would have backed such policy decisions upon their being subjected
to public scrutiny and criticism.
Only a fly on
the wall would be strategically positioned to gaze into and appreciate
the thinking of our Cabinet ministers.
That would at
least help in solving the riddle of what exactly informs some of
the policy formulations and pronouncements as well as come to grips
with the national conscience of the prime movers behind such decisions.
Opportunities
for nation building and mending of fences to regain the international
goodwill that will attract the requisite investment and foreign
currency inflows, are easily lost through some of these ill-advised
decisions.
Granted, it
is the business of security agents to maintain a hawk’s eye on developments
that might compromise the country’s sovereignty and economic interests.
But in so doing,
is it prudent to come up with a Bill that will enable the government
to spy into telephone and e-mail messages in what will obviously
be a blatant and outright invasion of privacy and infringement of
the right to receive and impart ideas without interference with
one’s correspondence.
In proposing
the new measures, the government even expects the service providers
whose business will be adversely affected by such an eventuality
to assist in the successful implementation of the end result by
providing the means to the end.
The proposed
Bill will make it compulsory for service providers to install the
enabling equipment on behalf of the state while empowering state
agencies to open mail passing through the post and through licensed
courier service providers.
The Bill stipulates
that operators of telecommunications services will be compelled
to install software and hardware to enable them to intercept and
store information as directed by the state.
Is this not
expecting the turkey and the goats that are slaughtered ahead of
certain festivities to look forward to Christmas? These decisions
only serve in the further alienation of the government, business
community and foreign investors.
President Robert
Mugabe is on record saying there is need to build bridges with the
United Kingdom – a development which if pursued vigorously and soberly,
will in no doubt help fulminate the right signals to the international
community.
The envisaged
bridges have to be built on solid foundations in the form of informed
domestic and foreign policy formulations that foster respect for
basic human rights and freedoms.
An Interception
of Communications Act as envisaged under the proposed 2006 Bill,
is therefore a contradiction in terms in the context of building
bridges with an already sceptical and suspicious international community.
While the nation
is still battling to come to terms with the rationale of Communications
Bill, Dr Tafataona Mahoso, the chairman of the Media and Information
Commission (MIC), enters the fray of confusion.
Mahoso is reported
as having said the MIC had submitted to government proposals to
amend the Access
to Information and Protection of Privacy Act (AIPPA) to regulate
the entry of foreign publications into Zimbabwe.
The MIC chairman
told the Parliamentary Portfolio Committee on Transport and Communications
that there was need to regulate distributors of foreign published
material as some of it was subversive.
He said those
distributors who import foreign periodicals should indicate where
they are procuring such materials. To continue to trudge on this
path of intransigence without drawing lessons from the embarrassing
debacle arising from the unlawful seizure and subsequent release
of ZimInd publisher Trevor Ncube’s passport, will only lead to a
cul de sac.
It is trite
to note that the passport was released after the Attorney-General’s
Office declined to file an opposing affidavit against an application
for its immediate release because the seizure was unlawful.
Under the Constitution
Amendment (No 17) Act the government is empowered to seize the
passports of citizens suspected of undermining "national interests"
during their travels abroad.
Mahoso’s proposed
amendments are therefore particularly jarring as they come in the
wake of unchallenged reports that the government is reportedly reviewing
the Access to Information and Protection of Privacy Act (AIPPA)
with a view to removing offending provisions in the Act.
The reviews
in question were undoubtedly influenced by a damning report by the
African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights (ACHPR) which expressed
concern over the suppression of fundamental rights and liberties
through laws such as AIPPA, Public
Order and Security Act and the Broadcasting
Services Act (BSA).
However, Mahoso
appears to be sailing in a different if not conflicting direction
to the path reportedly being travelled by his principal, the Minister
of Information and Publicity to cleanse the country of the demons
of AIPPA.
Unless there
is a catch somewhere.
Great nations
are, however, built through conscientious efforts towards the creation
of public information space that promotes equal and effective participation
in decision-making.
Without that
Zimbabwe, will continue to be under the international spotlight,
albeit for the wrong reasons arising from the formulation of ill-advised
policies that do not conform to international norms and dictates
expected of functioning democracies.
Visit the MISA-Zimbabwe
fact sheet
Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.
TOP
|