THE NGO NETWORK ALLIANCE PROJECT - an online community for Zimbabwean activists  
 View archive by sector
 
 
    HOME THE PROJECT DIRECTORYJOINARCHIVESEARCH E:ACTIVISMBLOGSMSFREEDOM FONELINKS CONTACT US
 

 


Back to Index

Statement by the Media Institute of Southern Africa (MISA) on the Occasion of the 38th Ordinary Session of the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights (ACHPR), Banjul, Gambia
MISA-Zimbabwe
November 24, 2005

Delivered by MISA-Zimbabwe legal officer Wilbert Mandinde, in Banjul, Gambia.

Chairperson, honourable commissioners, distinguished participants, we thank you for the time that we have been accorded to address this august house on the exercise of the right to freedom of expression in Zimbabwe.

Rarely are the words "Zimbabwe" and "crisis" mentioned incongruently these days.

Zimbabwe is in a crisis and freedom of expression remains under siege.

MISA-Zimbabwe maintains that the Access to Information and Protection of Privacy Act (AIPPA) is a repressive piece of legislation enacted primarily to undermine the right to freedom of expression and stifle the exchange of ideas and information.

Under AIPPA, the government- appointed Media and Information Commission (MIC), has refused to license the Daily News, The Daily News on Sunday and The Tribune.

Publishers and workers of these media organisations remain in the limbo.

AIPPA, the Public Order and Security Act (POSA) and Broadcasting Services Act (BSA), form an axis of repression against media freedom and freedom of expression in Zimbabwe.

It is against that background that MISA-Zimbabwe together with the Zimbabwe Lawyers for Human Rights and Independent Journalists Association of Zimbabwe, have filed submissions to the Commission to declare that AIPPA contravenes the provisions of the African Charter on Human and People’s Rights.

The other case filed by MISA-Zimbabwe relates to the Capital Radio Judgment.

Broadcasting environment
Chairperson, it is of great concern that Zimbabwe which is celebrating its silver jubilee of independence from colonial rule, still only has one broadcaster, the state-controlled Zimbabwe Broadcasting Holdings (ZBH).

Zimbabweans have expressed interests in investing in this sector, but the Broadcasting Authority of Zimbabwe (BAZ), which is vested with the authority to issue licences has failed to issue a single licence despite the enactment in 2001 of the BSA which recognises the principle of the three-tier broadcasting system.

No private players have been granted operating licences as all the applications for local and national commercial radio stations and commercial television services are, alarmingly, said to have failed to meet the criteria set in terms of the BSA.

Munhumutapa African Broadcasting Corporation was in September this year denied an operating licence to set up a commercial television station.

We are, however, happy to note that this issue has captured the attention of our parliament which is investigating the operations of the state broadcaster and that of the regulatory authority, BAZ.

It should, however, be noted that this latest parliamentary probe comes on the backdrop of previous other parliamentary recommendations on the need to transform the ZBH into a truly independent public broadcadster.

These recommendations have largely been ignored, pointing to a weak democracy in which the executive does not respect the representatives of the people.

Harassment of Journalists
Chairperson, while cases pertaining to the harassment, arrests, vilification and assault of journalists working for the private media have markedly declined compared to the period leading to the 2000 and 2002 parliamentary and presidential elections, respectively, the clamped legislative media environment is still far from the ideal.

The decline in cases of media freedom violations is largely due to the absence of the critically informative Daily News.

That as it may be, the enactment of the Criminal Law (Codification and Reform) Act and the recent tabling of the General Laws Amendment Bill which seek to tighten sections of the Public Order and Security Act (POSA), speaks volumes of a recalcitrant government that is unwilling to open the country’s democratic space.

With the signing into law of the Criminal (Codification and Reform) Bill on 2 June 2005, it will be increasingly difficult for the few journalists who are still employed to perform their newsgathering tasks without fear or favour.

Zimbabwean journalists now risk spending 20 years in jail following the signing of the Bill into law as the new Act introduces harsher penalties than those provided for under POSA and AIPPA.

However, in Zimbabwe it is an offence to make an abusive, indecent, obscene or false statement about the President, in his official or personal capacity.

POSA imposes a fine of Z$ 20 000 or a one year jail term or to both such fine and imprisonment. The Codification Act raises the fine to Z$200 000 while the prison term remains the same.

The Public Order and Security Act (POSA) will be further tightened by increasing the penalty fees against journalists convicted for publishing statements that undermine the authority of, or insulting the President.

This is contained in the General Laws Amendment Bill which seeks to amend several other Acts including the amendment of 22 sections of POSA.

The proposed amendments seek to increase the fine imposed under Section 16 of POSA which deals with undermining the authority of the President by a shocking 10 000% from Z$20 000 to Z$2 million or one year imprisonment or both such fine and imprisonment.

Secret service involvement in newspapers
Chairperson, we were shocked by recent reports that the Zimbabwean State Security Agents, the Central Intelligence Organisation (CIO), infiltrated the Zimbabwe Mirror Newspapers Group.

State security agents have no business in the media and should leave the running of media houses in the professional hands of media practitioners and concentrate on their role of providing state security intelligence.

Suffice to say these developments amply demonstrate that Zimbabwe is far from conforming with its constitutional, regional and international obligations as mandated under the various charters and conventions it has ratified to foster and secure an environment that respects freedom of expression as a fundamental human right.

This intransigence which continues to impact negatively on media freedom, is amply demonstrated through the enactment and amendments to legislations that have a direct and negative bearing on the exercise of the right to freedom of expression.

I thank you.

Visit the MISA-Zimbabwe fact sheet

Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.

TOP