Back to Index
Electoral
procedures
Media
Monitoring Project Zimbabwe (MMPZ)
Extracted from Weekly Media Update 2005-04
Monday January 24th – Sunday January 30th
2005
INFORMATION
on the country’s electoral process remained preciously scarce during
the week as authorities failed to use the media to adequately inform
the public about pertinent issues relating to electoral procedure.
This dearth of information was worsened by the media’s failure to
ferret out this information from relevant authorities for the benefit
of their audiences.
For example,
although the private media noted that there was a lack of publicity
about the need for Zimbabweans to inspect the voters’ roll, they,
like the government media, did not challenge the authorities why
its publication of the list of inspection centres was not accompanied
by a publicity blitz, especially on ZBH, the national public broadcaster
whose stations reach a wider national audience.
Neither did
they query government on the short period voters were given to check
their names on the rolls.
Ironically,
the Tsunami Disaster Fund and ZANU PF advertisements disguised as
part of the commemorations for the country’s 25th Independence
anniversary, which punctuated almost every ZTV programme, got more
space than any publicity on the inspection of the voters’ roll.
In fact, Zimbabwe
Broadcasting Holdings (ZBH) only mentioned the inspection exercise
in 10 of its news stories it carried during the week. Even then
the issue was mostly reported as part of reports on ZANU PF activities,
in which party officials called on their supporters to check their
names.
The two reports
that the government Press carried on the matter were not informative
either. One merely quoted a Chipinge District Administrator calling
on the electorate to inspect the voters’ roll. The other claimed
that many people in Bulawayo had inspected the roll, a claim contested
by SW Radio Africa (28/1), which reported to the contrary.
The private
Press inexplicably ignored the matter.
Apart from failing
to take the authorities to task over the lack of publicity on the
inspection of the roll, none of the media followed up the MDC’s
previous claims that the register was in a shambles by carrying
out their own independent investigation on the matter.
Neither would
the media relate civic society’s reticence on the electoral process
to the repressive legislation that seeks to curtail NGOs’ participation
in the electoral process.
Only the Zimbabwe
Election Support Network (ZESN) was seemingly involved in the process.
The organisation placed advertisements in the private and government
Press urging the public to check their names.
It is vital
that the media should fully inform their audiences on important
matters such as the electoral process so as to empower the public
to make informed choices in choosing their leaders.
Visit
the MMPZ fact
sheet
Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.
TOP
|