|
Back to Index
Political
developments
Media
Monitoring Project Zimbabwe
Extracted
from Weekly Media Update 2004-46
Monday November 15th – Sunday November 21st
2004
THE government
media’s censorship of the power struggles within ZANU PF, largely
triggered by the scramble for the post of vice-president, reaffirmed
them as unreliable sources of information unable to inform the public
adequately on important events.
While the private
media openly discussed the succession issue, the government media
largely ignored the matter and only covered it at the weekend, more
than a week after the private media broke the story.
Even then, coverage
by the government broadcaster (20 & 21/11, 8pm), The Sunday
Mail and Sunday News (21/11) seemed to have been prompted
by President Mugabe’s public comment on the matter during his address
to ZANU PF supporters who had come to meet him at the Harare International
Airport on his return from a two-day visit to Tanzania.
These media
reported Mugabe saying he fully supported the decision by his party’s
politburo to reserve the vice-presidency for a woman.
Ironically,
a day before Mugabe’s comments, ZTV (19/11, 8pm) even tried
to dismiss private media reports on the issue. It passively quoted
ZANU PF spokesman Nathan Shamuyarira dismissing the Zimbabwe
Independent (19/11) story, which noted that the decision by
the politburo to nominate a woman for the vice-presidency had enhanced
the chances of Water Resources Minister Joyce Mujuru of clinching
the post while diminishing those of another contender, ZANU PF secretary
for administration Emmerson Mnangagwa.
Without attempting
to carry out an independent analysis of the matter, ZTV’s chief
correspondent, Reuben Barwe, simply resorted to editorialising his
report with his own spiteful bias "calculated to influence
opinion": "…The report in the so-called independent
weekly that has unashamedly taken a position to denigrate the ZANU
PF leadership over the years is littered with a lot of spite all
calculated to influence opinion."
However, The
Daily Mirror (15/11), The Financial Gazette (18/24),
Zimbabwe Independent (19/11), The Standard and the
Sunday Mirror (21/11) did not display such professional journalistic
poverty. They fully updated their audiences on the unfolding events
and explored the power struggles within the party that the issue
had sparked.
For example,
The Standard reported that the decision to appoint a woman
as one of the two vice-presidents had created disenchantment within
ethnic groups, such as the Karangas and Manyikas, who believed the
elevation of Mujuru to the vice-presidency would "perpetuate"
the Zezurus’ stranglehold on the ZANU PF leadership.
These observations
seemed to tally with President Mugabe’s apparent confession on ZTV
(20/11, 8pm), and in The Sunday Mail and Sunday News
the next day, that some party officials were unhappy with the politburo’s
decision. He warned that the issue could become a problem at the
party’s Congress in December.
Besides revealing
the extent of the fierce rivalry within the ZANU PF leadership,
the media also exposed serious in-house fighting among ruling party
officials as tension heightened ahead of the party’s primary elections
to nominate candidates to represent ZANU PF in the 2005 general
election.
For example,
the Press carried six reports about violence erupting within the
ruling party in areas such as Masvingo and Beitbridge. Three of
the stories were carried in the government Press, the rest in the
private Press.
In fact, the
Independent reported that campaigning among ZANU PF candidates
ahead of the party’s primaries had assumed fever pitch with the
ruling party’s aspiring candidate for Kadoma, Jimayi Muduvuri, "using
bizarre campaign tactics such as buying lingerie for women to attract
voters".
The broadcast
media ignored these issues.
Nevertheless,
the private radio stations continued to highlight the continued
rights violations allegedly perpetrated by state security agents
and supporters of ZANU PF against members of the opposition and
civic society by carrying about seven reports on the issue.
However, these
were compromised by their over-reliance on the MDC’s account of
the incidents, which were not balanced by alternative sources.
Visit the MMPZ
fact sheet
Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.
TOP
|