|
Back to Index
Image
building to give the impression that Zimbabwe still enjoyes international
popularity
Media
Monitoring Project Zimbabwe (MMPZ)
Extracted from Weekly Media Update 2004-17
Monday April 26th - Sunday May 2nd 2004
In an effort
to play down the adverse consequences of Zimbabwe’s international
isolation, the government-controlled media have relentlessly seized
opportunities presented by events of international stature to give
the impression that the country still enjoyed international popularity.
The just ended
Zimbabwe International Trade Fair (ZITF) was this week used to buttress
this perspective. Despite evidence clearly showing that small indigenous
firms dominated the once regionally renowned international trade
showcase, the government media claimed the event was a success.
Coupled with
this, they used the reception accorded President Mugabe at the inauguration
of South African President Thabo Mbeki and pro-Zimbabwe statements
made by Zambian President Levy Mwanawasa and Namibian leader Sam
Nujoma as proof that the international community, particularly the
developing world, supported the country’s leadership and its policies.
But in their
efforts to present the fair as a triumph, the government media gave
contradictory and confusing information on the number of exhibitors.
For example, The Herald (28/4) claimed that "a
total of 627 exhibitors including 10 from other countries"
exhibited at the fair adding that this was "the best
attendance in four years". A full list of foreign countries
exhibiting at the event was omitted, but appeared in the Zimbabwe
Independent (30/4) and the Sunday Mirror (2/5). The paper
then claimed that participants had said the increase in the number
of exhibitors was a show of confidence in government’s economic
policies.
The Sunday
Mail (02/05) quoted Industry and Trade Minister Samuel Mumbengegwi
saying, "ZITF 2004 was a unique fair" as
it attracted "631 exhibitors". Mumbengegwi
made similar comments on ZTV (29/4, 6 & 8pm) saying he was "satisfied
with the increase in the number of exhibitors…" But
the Sunday News (2/5) contradicted these claims. It quoted
ZITF general manager Daniel Chigaru as saying, "662 companies
participated at this year’s exhibition… Last year the Trade Fair
attracted 734 participants." But like
its stablemates, the paper still maintained that the fair was a
success. As proof, the paper noted that "the space covered
by this year’s event increased from last year’s 42 000 square metres
to more than 49 000 square metres, giving more room to small and
medium-scale enterprises and flea markets".
There was no
analysis on how this might help resuscitate the country’s ailing
economy. Instead, Power FM (29/4, 8pm) quoted businessman and ZANU
PF MP Walter Mzembi presenting the upsurge in small-scale industries
as indicative of the country’s economic recovery. He was quoted
as saying "imported goods and luxuries"
that were showcased in previous events "had no bearing
to home grown solutions to our economic challenges…"
The private
media refuted these claims. For example, the Sunday Mirror
pointed out that while the fair was meant to facilitate trade deals
that would create wealth for the country, "the atmosphere
resembled that of a flea market, where perishables are sold to members
on the public". It further noted that the fair’s business
days, which are only open to the business sector were low key and
could have been mistaken for "a window shopping affair
at one of the capital city’s malls".
The Zimbabwe
Independent revealed that ZITF’s livestock section, one of the
fair’s attractions, had few exhibitors. About "three-quarters
of the cattle pens (were) empty…", it reported, adding
that "only two donkeys" were notable at
the livestock display.
MDC economic
adviser Eddie Cross described the industrial section as "pathetic"
and attributed the poor livestock display to the absence of commercial
farmers who traditionally supported it. Said Cross: "Until
we get back to normal political and economic activities there will
not be a change to the situation…and exhibiting at the ZITF is a
waste of time as exporters are closing shop".
The Tribune
(30/4) also exposed the fair’s failure to attract livestock exhibitors
in its article, Donkeys add flavour to fair.
The Herald
and Chronicle (29/4) however, claimed that exhibitors were
happy with the deals they had struck. But besides the "$5million
worth of confectionery ordered from Biscuitman company"
by local retail shops and individuals, no other evidence was given
to substantiate the claim that "brisk business"
had been recorded at the fair.
The ZITF was
not the only event that the government media milked to gloss over
the effects of Zimbabwe’s isolation. The rousing welcome Mugabe
received at Mbeki’s inauguration provided evidence of his regional
popularity and was exploited by the government media to illustrate
the credibility of his fight against the Western world.
For example,
ZTV (27/4, 8pm) claimed that Mugabe received a standing ovation
because he "has endeared himself to many on the African
continent and beyond because of his resolute stance against all
forms of oppression of the weak and poor by the rich North."
The Herald
(29/4) echoed similar views, adding that the incident, together
with his Earth Summit speech and the reception he received at Walter
Sisulu’s funeral, "provide some idea of the polarity
of this fiery son of the soil".
However, SW
Radio Africa (27/4) quoted political analyst Stanford Mukasa dismissing
the significance of Mugabe’s reception saying, "when
Idi Amin was chairman of the OAU he also received a standing ovation
even during the times when there was disturbing news from Uganda
about his cruel rule."
The Zimbabwe
Independent revealed its reluctance to concede the possibility
of Mugabe’s popularity by claiming vaguely that it was told by "somebody
who was present" that the welcome received by Mugabe
emanated from the "VIP stands" adding that
"the general public were less enthusiastic".
But it didn’t seek to corroborate this impression, or investigate
the possibility of such popularity, a phenomenon that even some
in the South African Press found "bewildering".
The paper however,
did reveal that Commonwealth Secretary-General Don McKinnon had
used his attendance of Mbeki’s inauguration to lobby African leaders
to find a resolution to Zimbabwe’s deepening crisis.
His strategy
to resolve the Zimbabwean crisis found expression through the French
Foreign Minister, Michel Barnier, whom The Herald (29/5)
quoted as saying South Africa, as an African country, should be
given another chance to resolve the crisis in Zimbabwe.
However, none
of the media asked whether African countries would achieve the desired
result considering that most have studiously backed Mugabe’s policies
in the name of African solidarity. Clear evidence of this unbridled
support appeared in the Chronicle and The Herald (30/5).
They quoted Namibia’s President Nujoma as saying he would "openly"
support Zimbabwe "whether imperialists like it or not".
Said Nujoma: "We want to tell colonialists that we are
ready 24 hours if they dare to attack any of our countries, they
will meet us here", adding that Mugabe was a "shining
example of resisting imperialism and colonialism".
Visit the MMPZ
fact sheet
Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.
TOP
|