|
Back to Index
Threats
against foreign correspondents should be taken seriously
Rashweat
Mukundu, MISA Zimbabwe
March
19, 2004
Recent utterances
by Information Minister Jonathan Moyo that he intends to deal with
foreign correspondents who he accuses of "externalising" foreign
currency and being "mercenaries" must be taken seriously coming
from a man who has a history of carrying out his threats.
Minister Moyo
likens journalists to criminals the state is currently targeting
for the so called "economic crimes" and that they must also be dealt
with. He argues that foreign media houses such as Reuters, Agence
France Press and others operating in Zimbabwe are keeping "foreign
currency" earned in Zimbabwe outside the country. And that his department
has already submitted reports to the police. An interesting aspect
in the whole issue is the participation of the department of Information,
led by Moyo, in "investigations" against the journalists who are
alleged to be externalising foreign currency. Again attention has
to be drawn to the real intentions of Moyo in light of the new laws
promulgated to deal with such crimes as externalising foreign currency.
Moyo’s intention is to send a chilling message to all independent
media journalists and have everyone scurry for cover. Such a message
intends to create paralysis in the independent media and stop all
reporting. MISA-Zimbabwe has over time pointed at the wayward manner
in which the Department conducts its business especially against
private media and other independent journalists.
The assertions
by Moyo need to be taken seriously in light of the closure of The
Daily News and the Daily News on Sunday and the serious information
vacuum that has been created in Zimbabwe. Whatever independent reporting
that still occurs comes from the remaining few newspapers such as
the Zimbabwe Independent, the Financial Gazette, and foreign media
houses. What clearly ekes Moyo and his peers are the continued reports
on state abuses that still find its way into local and foreign media
outlets. Such reporting is important if the abuses of power by state
organs are to be kept in check. Interestingly enough a significant
number of those now accused of "externalising" foreign currency
are local journalists some who work for local media houses.
The real intentions
of Moyo are therefore to create a wall against any reporting that
he perceives as negative ahead of the 2005 parliamentary elections
and wishfully forever. Moyo dreams of Soviet, Cuban, and North Korea
command media operations were himself and the government would be
the only sources of news and indeed the disseminators of same. In
Zimbabwe, I believe, such an era is gone and never to come back.
The threats against independent journalists are not isolated but
part of a multi pronged strategy that involves harassing state media
journalists who do not show ultimate allegiance to the regime. The
recent firing of Sunday Mail news editor Mathew Takaona over spurious
allegations of having addressed fellow journalists in his capacity
as The Zimbabwe Union of Journalists president, are one pointer
of this harassment. Moyo’s stranglehold on the state media has become
a permanent feature of his propaganda machinery. Any pretence that
the state media is being run democratically has been erased as parliament,
the custodian of Zimbabwe’s assets is left out in any decision on
how the Zimbabwe Broadcasting Corporation (ZBC) and Zimpapers are
run. Journalists working for these institution are virtual prisoners
of the system and evidently moral is low.
There is no
doubt that harassment of journalist would be redoubled, but doubts
linger on whether that would stem focus on Zimbabwe. The ultimate
solution is to focus on the real crisis in Zimbabwe that is a political
and economic crisis. Shooting the messenger is no solution.
Visit the MISA-Zimbabwe
fact sheet
Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.
TOP
|