THE NGO NETWORK ALLIANCE PROJECT - an online community for Zimbabwean activists  
 View archive by sector
 
 
    HOME THE PROJECT DIRECTORYJOINARCHIVESEARCH E:ACTIVISMBLOGSMSFREEDOM FONELINKS CONTACT US
 

 


Back to Index

The land audit and reform
Media Monitoring Project Zimbabwe
Extracted from Weekly Media Update 2003-36
Monday September 7th - Sunday September 14th 2003

The week saw the Presidential Land Review Committee led by Charles Utete present the long-awaited land audit report to President Robert Mugabe, amid reports that chaos continued to reign supreme over the contentious land reform programme.

In their coverage of the issues, the government-controlled media sought to present government as committed to restoring order and stamping out corruption that has marred the land distribution exercise. As a result, they conveniently failed to investigate and expose government officials, who had violated the one-man one-farm policy. Instead they merely churned out claims by authorities that top officials were returning extra land they had seized. It was therefore hardly surprising that they did not attempt to expose some of the nitty-gritties of the findings of Utete’s committee, which the private media did.

Besides investigating the details of the audit report, the private media continued to highlight the anarchy that has engulfed the farming sector ever since the land reforms began. In fact, their tenacity in covering the land issue was epitomized by The Financial Gazette (11/9) story Land scandal unfolds- ZANU PF heavyweights. The article, which coincided with the presentation of the land audit report, carried a list of top ruling party officials who had allegedly violated government policy and acquired more than one farm. Although the article only highlighted the extent of land grabbing by top officials in Matabeleland, it indeed gave an insight into how some officials had allegedly milked Zimbabwe’s controversial land reform for their benefit.

None of the media has followed up on The Financial Gazette’s findings by investigating the situation in other provinces.

Instead, ZBC (11/9, evening bulletins) merely gave a platform to officials who were implicated by The Financial Gazette to defend themselves. In its 8pm bulletin, ZTV quoted ZANU PF Chairman John Nkomo as saying, "For some reason some people’s names will appear on lists when in fact the individuals have not been informed…people just come up with names and come up with figures." Home Affairs Minister Kembo Mohadi cobbled a conspiracy theory to defend his alleged multiple-farm ownership alleging he was included in the list by people who "are trying by all means to scandalise me and tarnish my image, but I am very clean". He further attributed his alleged involvement in land grabbing to people who were trying to neutralise ZANU PF stronghold of Beitbridge by getting rid of him. Even Matabeleland North Governor Obert Mpofu, who reportedly handed over an extra farm to government, dismissed reports on multiple land ownership by chefs saying they emanated "from those opposed to the land reform programme. They want to show a picture of failure…"

However, ZANU PF senior official Shuvai Mahofa, transcended patronage. ZTV (11/09, 6pm) quoted her corroborating private media reports saying, "what is bad is the chef has a farm and the wife has a farm…(yet) they are one family." ZTV did not challenge her to give names of such individuals. But this was hardly surprising as it jellied well with government-controlled media’s attempt to pre-empt the land audit’s findings by giving the impression that those who had multiple farms were already adhering to President Mugabe’s call that they should give them up. For instance, The Herald, Chronicle (9/9) and ZTV (9/9, 7am) quoted Nkomo as saying "ZANU PF officials and other people" had handed over "30 000 hectares of excess land" to government. Apart from naming Mpofu as one of the individuals, who had handed over land, the rest of the culprits remained faceless. Without challenging Nkomo to give other names, The Herald and Chronicle then quoted him trying to explain the causes of multiple farm ownership saying some people had benefited from both the A1 and A2 resettlement models and that, "some people…acquired farms in different provinces and ecological regions in a bid to widen their farming prospects".

But the papers were oblivious to the fact that such excuses were far from controlling the damage but merely buttressed reports that the whole exercise was chaotic. Further, the two ZIMPAPERS dailies echoed without verification, government claims that 300,000 families had been resettled under the A1 model.

However, The Zimbabwe Independent (12/09) disputed this figure. It reported that the land audit committee had discovered that "only about 130 000 families have been allocated land..." adding that the figures "were exaggerated to justify the grabbing of large tracts of land…" Following such revelations of land grab, President Mugabe was quoted as promising the land audit committee that, "We shall take full cognisance of your findings...we will take urgent action", The Daily News (12/9). The paper then seemingly interpreted these remarks to mean that Mugabe might sack government officials implicated in the land scam. The Sunday Mirror was equally optimistic saying, "…indications…so far filtered through to us point to a serious resolve by the head of state to correct anomalies embedded in the country’s land reform." However, the two papers failed to fully explain why government would this time act on Utete’s findings when it has failed to thoroughly do so in the past.
Further, except for The Sunday Mirror, none of the media tried to draw parallels between the findings of the recent land audit with the one done under Flora Bhuka.

Meanwhile, the private media continued to expose the chaos that surrounds the whole resettlement programme. For example, The Daily News (9/09) revealed that rather than heeding Mugabe’s call to hand over extra farms they had grabbed, some of them were actually doing the exact opposite. It reported that war veterans’ leader, Mike Moyo, had clashed with Mines Minister Edward Chindori-Chininga over a farm Chindori-Chininga allegedly wants "to grab from him to add to two other farms the minister already has in Mazowe district." The same issue also pointed out that despite Mugabe’s call "no Cabinet minister has publicly surrendered the extra farms…"

To further highlight that government’s one-man one-farm policy seemed to be an illusion, The Daily News (12/09) quoted Justice for Agriculture as having said that 1, 500 single-farm owners had each lost their properties to land reform.
The same paper (10/09) revealed that besides lack of a clear policy on land acquisition, farm invasions were continuing. It reported that ZANU PF supporters and a retired army colonel had forcibly taken over the Lion and Cheetah Park outside Harare. The report further stated that the invaders had refused to have the animals relocated thus endangering the lives of people in surrounding communities.
In another report, the paper also alleged that unnamed government officials in Matabeleland had renewed pressure on Halglen Animal Conservancy owners to leave, putting the lives of 3,200 animals at risk. In fact, The Daily News (10/09) disclosed that game ranchers had "since the beginning of the government’s fast-track land reform lost up to 90 percent of their safari-hunting game..."

As if to confirm such reports, The Sunday Mirror (14/09) reported that the Department of National Parks and Wildlife had "barred influential politicians and businessmen allocated properties in Matabeleland North province under the A2 resettlement scheme from carrying out any hunting activities".

Studio 7 (08/09) reported that government officials were even evicting newly resettled farmers together with commercial farmers. Nevertheless, The Sunday Mail (14/09) insisted that the success of the land reform programme is "not questionable."

Visit the MMPZ fact sheet

Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.

TOP