|
Back to Index
Council, residents municipal debt a cause of concern
Combined Harare
Residents Association (CHRA)
January 19, 2012
Residents in Harare's Mabvuku, Highfield and Warren-park high
density suburbs have vowed to confront Harare City Council over
the continuous issuing of final letters of demand coercing residents
to pay monies which they claim to be ambiguous. This follows a spate
of threats sent to the same residents in 2011 dating from June.
Residents have argued that the local authority is not being sincere
in its demands hence there has to be unanimous position to this
regard. In Mabvuku, Harare City Council went for more than 3 years
without providing water and residents continued to receive bills
when no service was being provided at all. In Dzivarasekwa, it was
revealed during a public meeting convened by CHRA that there was
an anomaly with the billing system. Residents continued to receive
bills which were supposed to be scrapped as directed by the Town
Clerk, Mr. Tendai Mahachi. Some residents now have bills which have
shot up to USD$5 000. Last year in June, C.o.H resorted to charging
residents a fee of USD$20 as an admin fee a figure which was never
agreed amongst residents. This sparked a outcry amongst residents
who argued that any charge that should appear on the bill should
be something that has to be agreed upon by both the residents and
council during budget consultations.
Towards the
end of last year, CHRA released a statement which carried stakeholders
views on the current municipal debt crisis between residents and
council. It emerged that most stakeholders indicated the following:
- City of
Harare should write off the debt because already it has become
a bad-debt. If residents failed to pay $20 a month for rentals,
how will they be able to pay a $1000 debt.
- City of
Harare failed to provide basic services for a long period thus
it has to take it upon itself to cut this debt because it is a
question of social responsibility and accountability.
- City of Harare
should not demand $200 upfront as a means of negotiating a payment
plan; rather it should at least call for an open system in which
residents can always come with what they have in settling the
debt.
- City of Harare
has no obligation to attach residents' property because
it has flouted its own laws. C.o.H has failed to produce an audit
since 2008 as stipulated in Sec 304 (1) of the Urban
Councils Act hence this should be a cause for concern for
any reasonable rate payer.
The Association
maintains that residents must not have their property attached because
we haven't attached Councils property for failing to provide
services, some of which we would have paid for. There has to be
a proper engagement between C.o.H and residents. City fathers need
to engage a gear up in protecting residents' interest and
stop being cry babies always complaining that council technocrats
are doing things without their consent. These issues should also
be captured in the new constitution under the chapter on property
rights. We need a law that is able to protect the poor and the marginalized
who normally fall victim to canning politicians and shrewd individuals
who engage in primitive accumulation of wealth regardless of the
social impact.
Visit the CHRA
fact
sheet
Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.
TOP
|