|
Back to Index
Insights
into Sewerage management in Harare
Councillor
Michael Laban
February
01, 2003
Next
article
The last two
weeks I have spent a lot of time with the Department of Works, looking
at the structure, facilities, people, etc. and finding out how it
works. I have started concentrating on Sewerage and Water, and have
come to the conclusion that it is here that our highest priority
as City Council must be. The majority of the staff I have found
to be very helpful and very pleased to have someone who takes an
interest and wants to understand what is going on – so I will pass
as much on to you as possible. Some of you will be bored, and hopefully
some of you will know more than I do and will give me some pointers
and questions to ask. The next steps are tours of the sewerage works
(how exciting) and the water plants.
Sewerage
This
is the biggest problem – we simply produce more than we can deal
with. And because we live upstream of our water supply, we could
not even ignore the problem if it was morally possible to do so.
There are five
sewerage works around Harare. Three small ones are at Marlborough,
Hatcliffe, and Mabvuku Tafara (Donnybrook). These serve the small
areas nearby – Hatcliffe taking Borrowdale Brook as well.
The two biggest
are Crowborough and Firle, both down to the South West. Crowborough
is on the North bank of Marimba Stream, West of Mufakose, and Firle
is on the North Bank of the Makuvisi, South of Glen View. Crowborough
takes effluent from the Industrial areas (Workington etc), Avondale,
Mount Pleasant and "Little Marimba" an outfall pipe that
runs West of Bluff Hill and through Kuwadzana and Dzivaresekwa.
Crowborough takes a lot of industrial waste.
Firle takes
from the Makuvisi valley South of the railway, the central business
district, the eastern suburbs (Vainona, Borrowdale, Greendale, Chisipite
etc.) southern suburbs (Waterfalls, Hatfield etc) and the eastern
industrial area (Marimba, ZimPhos, etc.).
The capacities
and inflows (per day, in mega litres) are as follows:
| Works |
Capacity
|
Inflow
|
| Hatcliffe |
2.5
|
1.5
|
| Donnybrook |
10
|
10
|
| Marlborough |
2
|
2
|
| Crowborough |
56
|
110
|
| Firle |
150
|
135
|
So it is obvious
that Crowborough is spilling over 50 megalitres a day of untreated
sewerage into Chivero. This is the biggest problem.
Sewerage comes
through three sets of pipes – Collector pipes (about 150 mm) lead
to Trunk pipes (225 to 600 mm with an average size of 350 mm), which
go to Outfall pipes (600 mm or over). The sewerage pipes are made
of Asbestos cement and concrete, Clay, or PVC. Clay is the least
used because it has lots of joints. PVC is now getting expensive
because there is a foreign currency component.
Most are dealt
with from the sewerage workshops in Coventry Road. A particularly
bad spot is the Central Business District, where some pipes are
10 to 15 m beneath the surface. Anything over 6 m deep requires
the city to hire equipment since the equipment in stock (pumps and
excavators) cannot go that deep.
Most of the
sewerage runs on gravity, but there are three major pump stations
– Chisipite, the North East Commonage (Gunhill) and Avonlea. There
is a private pump (Zim Phos) at Lorelei, and a city pump at Budiriro.
When this last pump (actually three pumps in one building pumping
10 megalitres a day) breaks down, Budiriro sewerage goes down the
Marimba to Chivero.
On treatment,
Crowborough and Firle use the conventional, or mechanical system.
It is filtered through stone medium, then through other tanks, and
the effluent is pumped out on to the farms, where the city runs
12 000 head of cattle. The treated water then flows down to Chivero.
At Hatcliffe,
the Biological Nutrient Removal (BNR) system is used. This process
has an efficiency of 99 percent, and apparently in Windhoek, it
is pumped from these tanks into the water treatment plants. The
effluent is allowed to settle, where anaerobic bacteria remove the
nitrates, and it is then aerated, where aerobic bacteria remove
the phosphates. It should then be processed to kill the microorganisms,
but this is not currently being done.
At Donnybrook
and Marlborough the effluent is stabilised in ponds and then sifted
out. Epworth does not belong to the City of Harare. It is still
being administered by the Central government, and their sewerage
is all going into septic tanks.
There are plans
for a new sewerage treatment work at Lyndhurst Farm (South East
of Jaggers), which will be a BNR system, and plans to move more
waste through the Marlborough system to another new work at Selby,
about 15km North West.
The money for
all this is unknown. I understand they asked for $ 6 bn for the
year (for everything sewerage wise) and received $4 bn in the budget
(of $ 32 bn), but I must say I have not fully understood how the
budget, and votes etc. works.
So my conclusion
is that we need to improve/build more treatment capacity, while
maintaining the pipes and pumps in place already. Is there any way
to reduce sewerage? Industry (especially Zim Phos, it seems) can
be made to treat their waste, or produce less of it, at a large
cost to them (and therefore to us down the line). For individual/household
waste – I am sure there is more that I do not know.
The treatment
of all our sewerage will have cost benefits. If we stop spilling
into Chivero, we can use less chemicals (specifically Ecol 2000)
to treat the water before it is taken out. This will reduce costs,
and foreign currency costs, which can be used for other things.
It all has a snowball effect, but will take time (perhaps years)
to have a noticeable effect, and will cost money.
For more information,
contact Cllr Laban by email at: mlaban@mango.zw
Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.
TOP
|