Back to Index
Parliamentary Monitor: Issue 12
Monitoring Trust (Zimbabwe)
November 07, 2011
PDF version (682KB)
If you do not have the free Acrobat reader
on your computer, download it from the Adobe website by clicking
Time to Name & Shame
This is the
third time since we launched the Parliamentary Monitor that we discuss
the extent to which the Constituency Development Fund (CDF) was
used and abused. While there has been very little movement towards
fully establishing what happened, there was a glimmer of hope with
the news that there are some Members of Parliament who have been
identified as having abused the fund. It is said about 12 MPs allegedly
abused the fund. This could have been a relief but: mere figure,
12, will not help us much in identifying the culprits. It is important
that the 12 be named. Voters need to know who abused the funds and
they would then take the necessary steps, of either rewarding or
punishing the culprit. It is up to the ‘clean’ MPs to
push for the naming and shaming of the culprits. This will also
save them as with the nameless 12, every MP is a suspect and would
have a torrid time explaining issues. We have seen the loopholes
that come with this noble fund. What are the lessons learnt especially
with the alleged and yet to be proven cases of abuse? If there are
no lessons learnt, then we are likely to be discussing the same
issue next year this time. Our proposals would be that application
for the fund be professionalised. This will entail giving a detailed
report say at every critical stage of the implementation of the
fund. It is also important that the monitoring of the implementation
of the projects be withdrawn from the executive and be given to
a body that will be quick to highlight the possible gaps.
be learnt from what happens in Kenya where a similar fund is operational.
The argument that there is no funding for the monitoring/audit,
loses its strength when one looks at the benefits that come with
effective monitoring. It is also important to look at ways of further
expanding the fund so that it benefits the communities. this, we
have always been arguing can easily be achieved by making sure that
the amounts allocated to CDF are indexed to the national budget.
This will enable the fund to grow/ shrink in relation to the national
budget and while the total budget could be long now, it will improve
with a possible economic rebound and this will also see an increase
in the amount allocated to the fund. This is one sure way of tying
development to the national budget. In the absence of such indexing,
there is nothing that stops the treasury from starving the constituencies.
has not been said about CDF is the cheap politicking by the MPs
who claimed that they had sourced funds for projects. This is a
clear sign of the manipulative nature of our politics. It is thus
important to have clear information provision mechanisms so that
the people know where the funds are coming from. This is one sure
way to empower the communities so that they will be able to make
demands with regards to allocation of the resources. If we let MPs
continuing to lie that they sourced own funds, then there is no
platform for the people to engage, question and make suggestion.
Visit the Parliamentary
Monitoring Trust - Zimbabwe fact
Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.