|
Back to Index
POSA Amendment Bill blocked - Bill Watch 33/2011
Veritas
August 11, 2011
Both Houses
of Parliament have adjourned until Tuesday 30th August
Before then
it is likely that the President will have ended the present session
and opened a new session –the 4th session of the 7th Parliament
POSA
Amendment Bill: Introduced in Senate, but Blocked
Eight months
after it was passed by the House of Assembly Mr Gonese’s Private
Member’s Public Order and Security Amendment Bill was finally
introduced in the Senate on 2nd August, when Mr Gonese delivered
his speech opening the Second Reading debate and explaining the
Bill in detail. He pointed out that the Bill had been passed by
the House of Assembly with co-operation of members of all parties;
denied any intention to usurp the powers of the Executive by introducing
a Private Member’s Bill; and argued that the Bill was furthering
Articles 12 and 13 of the GPA.
Those Articles deal with freedom of assembly and the need for law
enforcement agencies to be impartial. After ZANU-PF Senators questioned
the need for the Bill and said more time was needed for “research”,
the debate was adjourned until 3rd August. On 3rd August Justice
Minister Chinamasa, who is ZANU-PF’s chief GPA negotiator,
objected to the Bill being before the Senate at all, saying that
the amendment of POSA was a matter under consideration by the GPA
negotiators as part of the Election Roadmap and that further debate
might undermine the Inclusive
Government.
The Minister
moved that the debate be adjourned. Mr Gonese agreed that the debate
be adjourned but emphasised the Bill was not being withdrawn. But,
the Senate then adjourned until 30th August and a new Session of
Parliament will probably be opened before that date, meaning that
the Bill will lapse. So Mr Gonese’s marathon, which began
in November 2009 when the House of Assembly gave him permission
to introduce his Bill – unopposed by ZANU-PF MPs – has
been brought to a halt on the last lap. This is probably the end
of the Bill – after these developments it seems unlikely that
the Bill will be revived next Session, unless all three parties
agree to do so following further negotiations.
This tactical
blocking of the Bill suggests a change of heart by ZANU-PF since
December last year, when the Bill was approved by the House of Assembly
with the co-operation of ZANU-PF members. If there was an objection
to the introduction of a Private Member’s Bill, that could
have been raised at the beginning of the Bill’s journey or
at any time since. The Bill was gazetted on 11th December 2009,
went through Portfolio Committee meetings and public hearings round
the country, was in the Lower House for a year and has been on the
Senate’s Order Paper since December 2010. So, the Senators’
claims to need further time for research also ring hollow. The end
of the Session has given ZANU-PF a convenient procedural method
of stopping the Bill without incurring the odium of having to vote
against what are really very mild compromise amendments to a piece
of legislation that many want to see repealed altogether.
Questions
raised:
Is the Inclusive
Government really going to come up with more comprehensive amendments?
In the meantime, who benefits from POSA continuing in its present
unamended form? Should a member of the Executive pressure a private
member to stop debate on a Bill and let the Executive deal with
the matter? Is what has happened to the POSA Amendment Bill another
regrettable illustration of Parliament’s continuing subservience
to the Executive?
Human
Rights Commission Bill: Public Hearings Disrupted
Parliament’s
public hearings from the 18th to 22nd July in Chinhoyi, Masvingo
and Mutare on the Human Rights Commission Bill were all disrupted.
The Harare hearing was originally scheduled for 23rd July at Highfield.
Fear of disruption by the same unruly mobs led Parliament to change
the venue to a committee room in Parliament. But outrageously, the
hearing in Parliament itself was also invaded by a violent mob -
they were bussed in and several hundred were toyi-toying in Africa
Unity Square before invading
Parliament. Inside the committee room members of Parliament,
those attempting to make representations to the committee, journalists
and members of the public were assaulted. The hearing had to be
prematurely terminated. These events, which were clearly orchestrated
and seemed to have nothing to do with objections to the Bill, are
deeply disturbing because they testify to a determination by whoever
organised them to erode the power and standing of Parliament as
a national institution. Also disturbing is the fact that the chaos
at the hearing in Parliament went on for so long without effective
police intervention. These events recall the invasion of the Supreme
Court in November 2000 by elements not prepared to entertain the
notion of an independent and fearless judiciary. It is important,
as the constitution-making process nears its final stages, to remember
that if State institutions are weak they cannot provide the checks
and balances without which true democracy is not possible.
Speaker’s
Statement on Disturbances
On 26th July
the Speaker issued a press
statement on the disturbances. He attributed the disruption
in Parliament on 23rd July to “rowdy gangs identified as ZANU-PF
activists who were dropped off at Parliament as they chanted their
party songs and slogans.” Condemning the events as showing
contempt for the authority of Parliament and as punishable offences
under the Privileges, Immunities and Powers of Parliament Act, the
Speaker called on law enforcement agents to move with speed to bring
“the sponsors and perpetrators of these crimes” to book,
pointing out that “it is these displays of lawlessness, human
rights violations and violence that continue to keep Zimbabwe high
up on the international relations scene for all the wrong reasons”.
[Note: Identification of the perpetrators of the disturbances in
Parliament on 23rd July should be easy for the police. Parliament
is equipped with surveillance cameras which recorded everything
that happened.]
Electoral
Amendment Bill: Tabled but will have to be Revived next Session
On 26th July
the Minister of Justice and Legal Affairs tabled the Electoral Amendment
Bill in the House of Assembly. In accordance with the Constitution
and the House’s Standing Orders the Bill was immediately referred
to the Parliamentary Legal Committee [PLC] for the committee’s
report on its constitutionality. The PLC has until 2nd September
to compile its report, although it has the right to ask the Speaker
for more time if it needs it. [Electronic version of Bill available.]
2007
Suppression of Terrorism Act Brought into Force
The Suppression
of Foreign and International Terrorism Act has been brought
into force with effect from the 29th July 2011, almost four years
after it was gazetted on 3rd August 2007. The commencement date
was fixed by SI 88/2011. The Act comes under the Ministry of Home
Affairs.
This Act does
not cover terrorism aimed at the government of Zimbabwe - that is
dealt with in the Criminal Law Code. The Act gives effect to Zimbabwe’s
obligations under the UN Convention against the Recruitment, Use,
Financing and Training of Mercenaries and OAU Conventions on the
Elimination of Mercenarism in Africa and the Prevention and Combating
of Terrorism. “Foreign or international terrorist activity”
is defined as terrorist activity directed against the government
of any foreign State, and includes “mercenary activity”.
New criminal offences relating to foreign or international terrorist
activity are created, such as: engaging in it; undergoing or providing
training to engage in it; recruiting persons to take part in it;
possessing weapons for us in it; soliciting support for or supplying
weapons or information to foreign or international terrorist organisations.
There is also provision for banning foreign or international terrorist
organisations and penalising membership of such organisations.
[Why Now? Why has the Act been brought into operation at this particular
time? Fears that it could be misused against legitimate internal
opposition groups seem groundless - the Act’s focus is on
activities directed against foreign states. Is Zimbabwe being used
or likely to used as a base or transit route for foreign or international
terrorist organisations or mercenaries? Or was the need to fix a
commencement date simply overlooked for nearly four years?]
Speaker’s
Ruling on Contempt of Parliament: Chinamasa Off the Hook
House of Assembly
Speaker Lovemore Moyo ruled on 4th August that there was no prima
facie case of contempt of Parliament against Justice Minister Chinamasa.
[The Mines and Energy Portfolio Committee had reported possible
lying by Mr Chinamasa, based on his failure to produce documents
to back up his evidence that the Government possessed the bearer
share certificates in SMM Holdings.] The Speaker said that when
the Minister failed to respond to its requests for the documents,
the Portfolio Committee should have ordered him to produce them
by serving a summons on him. As the Speaker also said that the Committee
has the discretion to revisit the matter in order to finalise its
investigation of the SMM case, there may be further developments.
In the same
ruling the Speaker stated that there was a prima facie case of contempt
of Parliament against SMM Administrator Gwaradzimba for statements
strongly criticising the Portfolio Committee made in a newspaper
interview. The statements “could reasonably be deemed to demean
the proceedings and character of the committee”, so the appointment
of a Privileges Committee to go into the matter was warranted. If
a Privileges Committee is appointed and he is found guilty, Mr Gwaradzimba
could be sentenced by the House to a fine of up to $400 or imprisonment
for up to 2 years or to both a fine and imprisonment.
Veritas
makes every effort to ensure reliable information, but cannot take
legal responsibility for information supplied
Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.
TOP
|