Introduction
If the outreach
programme is concluded by the end of this month and if COPAC sticks
to the agreed timetable – big ifs, both of them, in view
of the delays that have dogged the process so far – then
the referendum can be expected by May next year. Under the GPA
the parties agreed that within three months after COPAC had completed
its outreach programme a draft constitution would be prepared
and presented to a second All-Stakeholders Conference, and one
month later would be laid before Parliament for debate; Parliament
would have one month within which to debate the draft, and then
within three months the draft would be gazetted and put before
the electorate in a referendum. In anticipation of this, the Minister
of Finance has reportedly been instructed to set aside one hundred
million dollars in the coming budget to pay for the referendum.
The referendum,
whenever it takes place, will be held in terms of the Referendums
Act [Chapter 2:10] and the regulations made under the Act. What
do the Act and the current regulations say about referendums,
and should the Act be amended and/or should the regulations be
amended or replaced to enable the constitutional referendum to
take place satisfactorily?
The
Provisions of the Referendums Act and Regulations
The Referendums
Act was passed in 1999 and was amended in 2004 in an attempt to
bring it into line with the current Electoral
Act. The Referendums Regulations [Statutory Instrument 22A
of 2000] have not been amended. The main provisions are as follows:
Calling
of referendums
Under section
3 of the Act, the President has power to call a referendum, to
state the question to be put to voters at the referendum, and
to fix the dates and times of polling. In exercising these powers,
the President must act on the advice of Cabinet [section 31H(5)
of the Constitution].
Entitlement
to vote at referendums
Under section
6 of the Act, anyone who can satisfy the presiding officer of
a polling station that he or she is an adult and eligible to be
registered as a voter on the voters’ roll is entitled to
vote at a referendum. So adult citizens who are resident in a
constituency are entitled to vote. The Referendums Regulations
supplement this by stating that anyone who shows that he or she
is a citizen by producing a national I.D. or a “waiting
pass” [proof of application for an I.D. or interim I.D.]
or a passport or drivers licence is presumed to be entitled to
vote at a referendum. Note that there is no need for prospective
voters to produce proof of residence: under section 5 of the regulations
voters can cast their votes at any polling station no matter where
they reside, so proof of residence is irrelevant.
Voters’
rolls are not to be used in referendums for the purpose of identifying
voters, unless the Registrar-General, now presumably the Zimbabwe
Electoral Commission [ZEC] directs that they must be used [section
8 of the regulations].
Voting
at referendums
Ballot papers
at a referendum state the question that is being put to the voters,
and immediately below the question there are two rectangles where
voters can put a cross opposite the words “Yes” and
“No”. The question must therefore be stated in such
a way that voters can answer it with a yes or a no. This is clear
from section 8 of the Act, which deals with the counting of votes,
and section 3 of the regulations, which prescribes the form of
ballot papers.
This is not
quite as restrictive as it sounds. In the constitutional referendum,
for example, it would be possible to state several questions relating
to the draft constitution, each of which could be answered with
a yes or a no. For example: “Do you approve of the Declaration
of Rights in the new constitution? Yes or No.” “Do
you approve of Chapter III relating to the President’s powers?
Yes or No.” And so on. It would even be possible, if COPAC
could not agree on a single draft constitution, to put two or
more drafts to the voters in a single referendum.
However, the
more options and alternatives that are put to the voters the more
complicated the voting process becomes, even if all the questions
can be answered with a yes or a no. If the electorate is to give
a clear answer in a referendum, it is best to keep the questions
short and simple.
Counting
of votes
According
to section 8 of the Act, votes are counted by returning officers
[impliedly at constituency centres] and the results forwarded
to ZEC’s Chief Elections Officer. The Act does not envisage
the procedure currently employed in elections under the Electoral
Act, whereby votes are counted at polling stations, then collated
and verified at constituency centres and [in the case of presidential
elections] finally collated at a national centre.
In this respect
the Referendums Act follows the procedure laid down in the earlier
electoral law, and it was not amended in 2004 to align it with
the current Electoral Act.
After the
votes have been counted in a referendum, the Minister of Justice,
not ZEC, must be told of the result, and it is the Minister, not
ZEC, who must publish a notice in the Gazette announcing the result
[section 13 of the regulations and 8(5) of the Act].
Appeals
against result of referendum
Section 9
of the Act allows an appeal to the Electoral Court against the
acceptance or rejection by a returning officer of votes “in
regard to which there has been a dispute between the returning
officer and an aggrieved party”. As there are no equivalents
to election agents in a referendum, it is difficult to see who
there would be to disagree with the returning officer’s
decision other than observers and they could hardly be aggrieved
parties to lodge an appeal. No appeal is allowed on any other
ground.
Application
of Electoral Act to Referendums
Under section
10 of the Referendums Act, the Electoral Act [note all references
in this bulletin are to the current Electoral Act, but there may
well be either a new or amended Electoral Act before the referendum
takes place, in which case Veritas will issue a revised comment
on the Referendums Act] applies to all aspects of a referendum
that are not specifically dealt with by the Referendums Act and
the regulations made under it. So observers for referendums are
accredited in the same way as observers for elections, and voters
may be assisted to vote in the same way as in elections, and so
on.
An important
point to note is that the Electoral Act applies only where the
Referendums Act and its regulations are silent. It is possible
for regulations [existing ones or any new ones brought out under
the Referendums Act] to override and modify the provisions of
the Electoral Act in so far as they apply to referendums [see
section 11(2)(d) of the Referendums Act]. Therefore ZEC could,
in theory, make regulations relaxing the restrictions which the
Electoral Act imposes on the accreditation of observers, for example,
to allow more local and foreign organisations to observe referendums.
Regulations
The current
regulations were made in 2000 under section 11 of the Act by the
Minister of Justice, Legal and Parliamentary Affairs when there
was no ZEC. When ZEC was established in 2004, section 11 of the
Act was amended to transfer the regulation-making power from the
Minister to ZEC. Section 11 empowers ZEC to make regulations on
a wide variety of matters. Any regulations, however, must be approved
by the Minister of Justice and Legal Affairs — which is
why in the preceding paragraph it was stated that ZEC’s
power to relax the restrictions on observers was theoretical rather
than actual.
It may be
that the requirement for the Minister’s approval of regulations
— like the similar requirement in the Electoral Act —
is unconstitutional in the light of section 100H of the Constitution,
which states that the State must make provision to ensure that
ZEC is able to exercise its functions independently.
Electronic
versions of Referendums Act and Regulations available on request
Part
II – Suggested Amendments to the Referendums Act and
Regulations – to follow
Veritas
makes every effort to ensure reliable information, but cannot
take legal responsibility for information supplied.