|
Back to Index
This article participates on the following special index pages:
Unity governments - Kenya experience - Index of articles
Preventing violence - Lessons from the Kenyan Constitution Referendum
- Peace Watch 8/2010
Veritas
August 13, 2010
Background
The constitution
making process was started over eight years ago in Kenya, at the
time of transition from a virtually one party state to a multiparty
democracy. A proposed draft was put to a referendum in 2005. As
many of the reform provisions of the draft had been watered down
by politicians, it was rejected following widespread opposition
and civil unrest. To end the crisis caused by political polarisation
after the controversial results of the 2007 elections and the horrific
violence which ensued, leaving well over a thousand dead and hundreds
of thousands displaced as internal refugees, a Government of National
Unity was set up in 2008. Part of the plan hammered out by Kofi
Annan’s mediation team was a new constitution which would
rally all Kenyans in the interest of national unity. A draft was
drawn up, after wide consultation, by a committee of experts. It
was adopted by Parliament on April 1st this year, gazetted on May
6th and put to voters in a referendum on August 4th.
Fears
of Renewed Violence during the Kenyan Constitution Referendum
After its gazetting,
those supporting the draft constitution - “the greens”
- and those against it - “the reds” - waged nation-wide
campaigns to mobilise supporters. As the date for the referendum
drew closer there seemed good reason to fear that the violence after
the 2007 elections might be repeated. In mid-June there was a bomb-blast
at a rally held by opponents of the new constitution and the ensuing
stampede left six dead and dozens wounded. There were also reports
of hate-speech and threats. Various political leaders with followings
from different ethnic groups were taking different positions. As
early as March leaflets in some areas warned ethnic/political “outsiders”
to leave the area before the referendum. In Tenderet, southern Kenya,
leaflets dated July 5th warned the communities to prepare for war
should the 'Yes' team win. Local vigilante groups, 'Home Boys',
some of who were believed to have carried out the atrocities in
the post-election violence in Nandi East and Tinderet, were thought
to be operating again. Similar threats were issued to 'outsiders'
in other areas. The chairman of Kenya’s National Cohesion
and Integration Commission expressed concern that growing tension
in some parts of the country would undermine the upcoming referendum
and that there was documentary evidence of a threat of violence
as campaigns continued. “We are seeing some very hot spots,
particularly in the Rift Valley, and we are concerned about it.”
The potential
for serious outbreaks of violence was real. It was obvious that
action was necessary to prevent that potential turning into ugly
reality.
Launch
of Uwiano Peace Platform
The Uwiano Platform
for Peace was launched in Nairobi on 14th July as a partnership
of:
- The National
Cohesion and Integration Commission [NCIC] [set up by the Government
of National Unity to create harmony, tolerance and appreciation
of Kenya’s ethnic diversity]
- The National
Steering Committee on Peace Building and Conflict Prevention [NSC]
[set up by the Office of the President and comprising representatives
from government, civil society, UNDP]
- PeaceNet
[a broad-based coalition of peace workers, largely at the grassroots
level, who strive to foster peace in their local communities and
in the nation at large].
Uwiano [Kiswahili
for cohesion] aimed to take proactive steps to prevent violence
over the referendum. Speaker after speaker at the launch called
on all people to be ambassadors for peace, wherever they were, and
as responsible citizens to do their part in preventing violence
in their neighbourhoods. As a joint initiative, Uwiano enjoyed the
support of government, local civil society and churches as well
as foreign donors, etc. Its basic strategy was to try and maintain
peace by organising a system to get up-to-date information on tensions,
hate speech, incitement, threats and violence throughout the country
and to relay this information to organisations in the best position
to undertake a rapid response.
Uwiano
Built on Existing Peace Campaigns and Interventions
Because of a
long history of sporadic violence in Kenya - over land settlement,
between agriculturists and pastoralists, regional conflict based
on unfair distribution of resources, political conflicts exacerbated
by and in turn exacerbating ethnic and regional tensions - a number
of organisations had set up peace building initiatives in Kenya.
After the outbreak of violence following the 2007 elections there
was a more concerted effort to respond to both the effects and causes
of the violence and to prevent it happening again. As polarisation,
tensions and threats of violence increased towards the referendum,
it was decided to coordinate these activities.
Early
Warning System
Uwiano engaged
all Kenyan peace building structures to monitor potential violence
and share early warning information so as to facilitate early intervention.
Media clips - voice and video recordings, photographs, including
of hate leaflets - and in particular SMS's were the main sources
of information. Through close working ties with civil society organizations
and district and community peace committees, UWIANO came up with
focal point persons in every locality who would verify early warning
alerts. The peace committees, civil society and members of provincial
administrations lined up a series of meetings in specific “hot
spots”.
Use
of Cell Phones to Report Problems
A system was
set up enabling individuals to use their mobile phones to relay
text messages free of charge on all available networks to the Uwiano
secretariat. Any Kenyan citizen was free to send text messages about
the peace situation in any part of the country in order to guard
the peace in their own neighbourhoods - what was happening, where
it was happening, why it was happening, who was involved, and how
serious the happenings were. For example - an SMS came in 3 days
before the referendum day. It read as follows: “Good afternoon,
we just received a message from Nyeri about a looming attack by
the Mungiki [a politico-religious group banned as a violent criminal
organization] on a vigilante group after they killed one of them
yesterday. We have verified but have no mandate to call the police.
Kindly follow up.” On receipt of this message, information
was relayed to one of the UWIANO Platform for Peace principals for
quick intervention. Within a matter of 25 minutes, details had been
communicated to the District Commissioner in Nyeri Central and action
was taken by the police, including arrests.
Mapping
and Responding to Alerts
A team of data
analysts at PeaceNet Kenya managed and responded to the information
coming in through an SMS nerve centre. It verified to ensure that
the information released was authentic, and analyzed information
into peace, tension or violence categories. Reports were sent to
all the networks and the media and relayed to the rapid response
mechanisms - the District Peace Committees [DPC’s], police,
media, CSO’s, the NCIC and the NSC.
Media
and Publicity Campaigns
To enable as
many Kenyans as possible to report incidents of violence or tension
build-up, a media campaign with messages on national cohesion, how
to report incidents, and best practices was rolled out in the print
and electronic media. The watchwords ‘Chagua Kenya, Chagua
Amani’ [Choose Kenya, Choose Peace] were broadcast and printed
on T-shirts and on Electoral Commission materials.
District Peace
Committees Some of these existed through the peace building efforts
of the last few years. In the build-up to voting day, more committees
were set up in districts which had been identified as potential
flashpoints through the Early Warning System. The peace committees
were ready to serve as mediators to defuse conflict situations before
they erupted into violence. They maintained close liaison with police
and local government structures. The DPC’s played a key role
in documenting peace building information around the referendum
period.
Peace
Vigil
UWIANO Platform
for Peace held a Peace Vigil at Kenya International Conference Centre
from 4.00 pm to 7.00 pm. on Tuesday August 3rd, the eve of the constitution
referendum day, as a culmination of the peace campaigns and interventions
they had been running across the country. The vigil theme was a
peaceful referendum. It brought together District Peace Committees
from the 9 districts of Nairobi, civil society organizations, community
based organizations and government agencies involved in promoting
peace. The vigil was preceded by a march from Uhuru Park led by
a band from the Office of the President. At 6.59 pm a moment of
peace was observed and televised on national television, and all
Kenyans were encouraged to switch off the lights, light a candle
and observe silence for one minute. Musician Achieng Abura led the
entire country in singing the national anthem. The crowd that had
gathered then joined in a rendition of the Bob Marley song “One
People”.
Results
The referendum
passed off peacefully despite the threats of violence. The Interim
Independent Electoral Commission announced the final referendum
tally as 66.9% “Yes” votes against 30.1% “No”
votes. Voter turnout stood at 72.1 %. Election observers declared
it free and fair. Despite the bruising referendum campaigns the
leaders of the “No” campaign accepted defeat gracefully.
Veritas
makes every effort to ensure reliable information, but cannot take
legal responsibility for information supplied
Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.
TOP
|