Back to Index
Govt to go ahead with key constitutional amendments
April 13, 2005
JOHANNESBURG - Zimbabwe's
ruling ZANU-PF party plans to use its two-thirds parliamentary majority
to change the constitution and create a second chamber and the office
of prime minister.
National political commissar Elliot Manyika told IRIN the party also intended
to "tighten legislation relating to land and economic reform, with a view
to giving statutory bodies more control over these crucial sectors and
core national assets".
President Robert Mugabe indicated soon after the 31 March elections that
he wanted to revisit aspects of the draft constitution of 2000. Among
its recommendations was the creation of a senate made up of traditional
leaders, retired politicians and other eminent Zimbabweans, as well as
a new post of prime minister.
Despite intense lobbying by government, the draft constitution was rejected
in a referendum in 2000, in a vote seen at the time as a sign of support
for the new opposition Movement for Democratic Change (MDC).
Manyika said the House of Senate was necessary for strengthening constitutional
democracy and widening the process of parliamentary decision-making, based
on national consensus.
However, Daniel Molokela, a Zimbabwean analyst and human rights lawyer
based in South Africa, said the proposed consitutional amendments were
meant to entrench ZANU-PF's rule through the appointment of loyalists
to crucial legislative bodies.
"The House of Senate should be composed of experienced politicians who
are also experts in various disciplines: its purpose is to moderate and
give a professional finish to legislation proposed by the lower house.
In the case of Zimbabwe that is highly unlikely to happen, as most of
the appointees would be political failures with none of the required expertise,"
A political analyst at the University of Zimbabwe, John Makumbe, told
IRIN that none of the proposed amendments would ease the economic and
political crisis in the country. He said amending an already flawed constitution
was a pointless exercise, and called for an entirely new constitution
drafted with national consensus.
The National Constitutional Assembly, an NGO that has been campaigning
for constitutional reform, criticised the current constitution, saying
it gave the president too much power and allowed the ruling party to manipulate
the election process.
Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.