|
Back to Index
SADC
Tribunal rules Zimbabwe breached November order and was in contempt
SADC
Tribunal Watch
June 05, 2009
Campbell
& Another vs Government of Zimbabwe
The Southern African
Development Community (SADC) Tribunal today dismissed a last-minute
application by the Government of Zimbabwe to postpone a contempt
application against it by Zimbabwe commercial farmers.
The Tribunal then proceeded
immediately to hear the farmers' application for a ruling that Zimbabwe
is in contempt of the Tribunal's November 2008 decision.
In the earlier decision
the Tribunal, now presided over by former Chief Justice Pillay of
Mauritius, and with senior judges from Angola, Botswana, Malawi
and Mozambique - held Zimbabwe's land seizure programme in
breach of the SADC Treaty's human rights provisions.
After hearing argument
today, the Tribunal adjourned to consider its ruling. On reconvening,
the Tribunal delivered a unanimous decision.
Chief Justice Pillay
stressed that Zimbabwe had not only breached the November order,
but was in contempt.
He singled out public
statements by President Mugabe and by the Deputy Chief Justice of
Zimbabwe, Justice Malaba, earlier this year, as well as a statement
by the Deputy Attorney-General that Zimbabwe would continue to prosecute
farmers protected by the Tribunal's order.
He added that the applicants
had also submitted "ample proof" of violations on the
farms in recent months, either investigated by Zimbabwe Government
police officials or permitted by them.
In an unusual move, the
Tribunal also ordered the Government of Zimbabwe to pay the farmers'
costs. Costs orders are only made by the Tribunal in "exceptional
circumstances".
The Tribunal concluded
its ruling by referring Zimbabwe's contempt to the SADC Summit for
consideration of measures to be taken under the Treaty against it.
These measures could include sanctions or expulsion of Zimbabwe
from SADC.
Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.
TOP
|