|
Back to Index
What's
the lie of Zimbabwe's land?
Lucy
Fleming, BBC News
September 18, 2008
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/7621495.stm
Sorting out the mess
of Zimbabwe's agricultural sector will be key to breathing life
back into the country's economy and to the success of the power-sharing
deal signed this week.
The detailed
agreement
devotes a whole section to the "Land Question".
It notes that the fast-tracked
farm redistribution is "irreversible", something President
Robert Mugabe defiantly reiterated at the signing ceremony with
the words: "Zimbabwe's land belongs to Zimbabweans."
But farmer Alan Smith
(not his real name), who has been kicked off four properties since
2000, says the deal also provides hope for white farmers wanting
to get back to the soil.
"We still love the
country. If there is a chance to get back to productive farming
without political interference and without the continuous threat
of violence, I really believe that a lot of people [white farmers]
would come back," he said.
His optimism is based
on a number of concessions in the new negotiated settlement.
Firstly, there is to
be an audit of the land to eliminate "multiple farm ownerships".
This has long been a
call by the former opposition Movement for Democratic Change, which
feels that much of the 11m hectares of prime farmland taken from
4,000 mainly white farmers has been given to ruling party loyalists.
"Anyone who has
multi farms which they obtained under the land reform programme
would have to lose, because it's one person per farm," Justice
Minister Patrick Chinamasa, Zanu-PF negotiator of the power-sharing
agreement, confirmed to the BBC.
Security
of tenure
The deal also says that
all Zimbabweans can be considered for land "irrespective of
race, gender, religion, ethnicity or political affiliation".
For the Commercial Farmers
Union (CFU), which claims its member have been unfairly prejudiced
in the chaotic redistribution programme, it is a shift in policy.
"That is a tremendous
positive from where we've come from," CFU President Trevor
Gifford said.
He also points to the
security of tenure the agreement guarantees to land holders, as
key to rebooting the sector.
Details of the guarantee
are yet to be decided, Mr Chinamasa says, but it is likely that
land, now considered state property, will be allocated on 99-year
leases.
This will allow capital
to be raised, which the justice minister says, has stunted new farmers,
leaving them unable to pay for equipment and seeds.
"I do have neighbours
who have really battled, because we don't have the finance,"
businessman and new farmer Musa Kwedza, who was allocated a small-scale
commercial farm in 2005, told the BBC.
In his opinion, the land
audit will weed out those who are not serious about farming and
the security of tenure will spur growth.
Mr Smith agrees the leases
will be a good compromise to allow farmers to raise cash - and it
is money that the agricultural sector desperately needs.
"I'm on the ground
and basically everything has been laid to waste - buildings and
barns - all the boreholes need to refitted, dams need to be repaired,"
he says.
'Once
bitten, twice shy'
The deal calls on the
international community to support land reform, and in particular
it asks the UK to pay compensation to white farmers who lost their
land.
"It's our right
to be compensated for what's been taken away from us. It's not like
we took the land from anybody; it was purchased," said Gordon
Stokes, who now farms in the UK.
But even if compensation
was paid out, he has no intention of uprooting his family again.
"If you've a reasonable
job elsewhere, would you go back to no health service, a place where
all the teachers have left and there is no security?"
Former farmer Jason Davies,
who left Zimbabwe for the UK 10 years ago, agrees.
"Once bitten, twice
shy," he says. "The risk is too high and it's not stable
enough. When Mugabe dies, there's going to be a power struggle,
then what happens?"
Some white farmers still
in Zimbabwe, like the 11 fighting their case at the Southern African
Development Community tribunal, alleging the land reforms were racist,
are more dogged.
And one former farmer
in the capital, Harare, told the BBC he "would not hesitate"
to go back to the land if he was offered his old farm back, with
or without compensation.
However, Mr Chinamasa
is quick to point out that they can apply for land, but not request
specific plots.
"They're not getting
their farms back. Anyone who wants to till the land must queue up
like anybody else."
He maintains the Zanu-PF
line that it is the UK to blame for snarling up land reform by reneging
on promises to pay out compensation under former Prime Minister
Tony Blair.
But the UK foreign office
told the BBC the government had fulfilled its obligations under
the 1979 Lancaster House agreement and had "never agreed . . .
to accept responsibility for compensation".
"We have always
expressed our willingness to work with others to support a fair
and transparent process of land reform," a spokesperson said.
"We will be willing
to consider supporting such a process as part of the wider recovery
package."
'Mugabe
not the issue'
The tired dialogue even
seems to have wearied Mr Chinamasa: "Let's not hark to the
past . . . as far we are concerned the objectives of the liberation
struggle have been confirmed."
But for Mr Smith, it
does not matter how the money is labelled, as long as it is forthcoming.
"Whether it's compensation
or a grant is immaterial; at the end of the day there has to be
a financial injection in order to get the farms running again,"
he says.
"I don't have any
doubt that Zimbabwe will become the bread basket of Africa again
and I will be here to be a part of it. It's just a matter of time."
Mr Kwedza is equally
optimistic, but says the "wait-and-see attitude" from
donors so far has been a disappointment.
"Robert Mugabe is
not the issue. The dispensation is new," he says.
"It will be very
exciting to see white farmers, black farmers - all of us - working
side by side towards the turning around of this economy."
Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.
TOP
|