Back to Index
Selection
and silence: Contesting meanings of land in Zimbabwean media
Wendy
Willems, Ecquid Novi: African Journalism Studies
2004
Download
this document
- Acrobat
PDF version (206KB)
If you do not have the free Acrobat reader
on your computer, download it from the Adobe website by clicking
here.
Introduction
With the widespread
occupation of commercial farms in February 2000, Zimbabwe's
long-standing problem of its inequitable land distribution brought
about by colonialism regained the attention of local and international
media. Whereas the farm occupations were part of a much wider economic
and political crisis in the country, the media - and the foreign
media in particular - often focused its attention on the land issue
without relating these to other developments in the country. The
Zimbabwean government became increasingly concerned about how the
land occupations were covered in the media and attributed great
importance to media representations of the land question. This is
demonstrated by the government's paranoid attempts to control
the operations of both local and international media through the
introduction of stringent legislation.
The government
also showed confidence in the persuasive power of the media. After
the 2000 parliamentary elections, it increasingly began to use the
state-funded media in order to win the hearts and minds of Zimbabweans
for its 'fast-track land reform' exercise. A music album
named 'Hondo ye Minda' [the struggle for land] was launched
and a variety of jingles and video clips were introduced such as
'Chave Chimurenga' [it is now war] and 'Rambai
Makashinga' [continue to persevere]. These would appear on
state radio and television several times per hour.
Acknowledging
the crucial nature of representations of the land question in the
Zimbabwean public sphere, this article analyses how meanings of
land were contested in two daily newspapers, the privately-owned
The Daily News and the state-funded The Herald, in the period from
February 2000 leading up to the parliamentary elections in June
2000. It deals with the nature of their reporting, their selection
of headlines, and their attribution of agency towards certain actors.
News is always
a selection of events that are taking place in the real world at
a particular moment in time. News is therefore not simply that what
happens but that which can be presented as newsworthy. Whereas some
events will be highlighted, others will be ignored. As Foucault
(1978:27) has pointed out, silence is very much part of any discourse:
Silence itself
- the things one declines to say, or is forbidden to name,
the discretion that is required between different speakers -
is less the absolute limit of discourse, the other side from which
it is separated by a strict boundary, than an element that functions
alongside the things said, with them and in relation to them within
overall strategies.
Applying this
to news production, Van Dijk (1991:114) argues that the analysis
of the 'unsaid' is sometimes more revealing than the
study of what is actually expressed in text. The focus of the analysis
will be on how newspapers have both included and excluded information
in their reporting on the need for land reform, the relation between
farmers and farm workers and the causes of farm occupations.
Download
the full document
Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.
TOP
|