|
Back to Index
Econet,
Telecel case: New regulation suspended
Fidelis Munyoro,
The Herald (Zimbabwe)
November 07, 2006
http://www1.herald.co.zw/inside.aspx?sectid=11094&cat=1&livedate=11/7/2006
THE High Court
has suspended the statutory instrument introduced by the Government
last week to stop the operation of independent gateways for incoming
and outgoing international telephone traffic pending the outcome
of a Supreme Court constitutional challenge by two private mobile
service providers.
The mobile service
providers — Econet Wireless and Telecel — are challenging the constitutionality
of the Government’s recently introduced statutory instrument to
stop the multi-gateway system, which allows many avenues for both
incoming and outgoing international traffic, meant to ensure accountability
by private operators in the industry.
Judge President
Rita Makarau suspended the regulation to allow the Supreme Court
— sitting as a constitutional court — to hear the two mobile operators’
case.
The Government
and the two companies yesterday agreed that Econet should file its
constitutional challenge of the regulation within 14 days, while
the Postal and Telecommunications Regulatory Authority of Zimbabwe,
Ministry of Transport and Communications and fixed network operator
TelOne — listed as respondents — should also file their opposing
papers within the time limits in terms of the law.
Justice
Makarau also directed that the applications by Econet and Telecel
should be consolidated and heard at the same time by the same judge.
Econet led the
way last week when it petitioned the High Court to block Government’s
move to seek control of the gateway system, before Telecel made
a similar application.
The suspended
regulation was due to come into effect on Wednesday last week.
Telecel managing
director Mr Rex Chibesa, in his affidavit filed with the High Court,
contends that the regulation was invalid because it contravenes
the parent Act.
He said the
fixing of the rates fell outside the scope and power of the minister
as contemplated and provided by the Postal and Telecommunications
Act.
But Potraz,
which is being represented by Mr James Muzangaza of Muzangaza, Mandaza
and Tomana, and the Ministry of Transport and Communications, represented
by Mrs Mukuruva of the Civil Division in the Attorney General’s
Office, are opposing the applications.
Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.
TOP
|