|
Back to Index
Claiming
Ground in ICT Policy Processes: Zimbabwe civil society experiences
Muroro Dziruni
and Margaret Zunguze
February 06, 2006
Download
this document
- Acrobat
PDF version (180KB)
If you do not have the free Acrobat reader
on your computer, download it from the Adobe website by clicking
here.
"What
is it to enable, so right and make possible, so fair and make true . . . . . .
" (Anonymous, 1957)
Zimbabwe
CSOs Experiences
The need to position the Civil Society Organisation (CSO) communication
concerns within the broader scope of the national ICT and media
policy domain in Zimbabwe initiated an innovative project: E-nable.
The niche identified by CSO stakeholders was to create a way in
which the sector could influence the national processes and make
sure that the voice of the sector resonates within the ICT policy
choices. This article highlights some of the lessons learnt from
this initiative, which others in the region could learn from.
E-nable
project background
The E-nable project initiative was conceptualised in May 2004 when
civil society organisations in Harare held a discussion forum on
understanding key policy issues, laws and regulations affecting
the right to communicate and the right to information. CSOs represented
at the meeting were particularly interested in understanding their
role in driving the communication agenda against the backdrop of
social deliverables articulated within the MDGs and the Geneva WSIS
plan of action. At the same time the local communication and media
context was assuming a different role in the wake of a new media
bill called the Access
to Information Privacy Protection Act (AIPPA) and the Public
Order Security Act (POSA) that were going to legislate for accreditation
demands on scribes in the media fraternity. CSO actors shared their
institutional and personal opinion on the way forward in light of
the apparent opportunities and perceived threats coming from both
these local and global contexts.
The
need for converged ICT policy
An outcome of the deliberations was the recognition that the ICT
arena in Zimbabwe was extremely fragmented from a policy and legislative
perspective. The sheer idea that media policy was being considered
for change as a single domain and in isolation suggested that there
was no national ICT policy that covered media itself, broadcasting,
technology and the ICT industry. Each of the areas was managed by
different line ministries and as such there was a deeply incoherent
ICT regulatory environment making it particularly difficult for
players in the sector to decipher their roles and responsibilities.
The CSOs recommended that networking should be continued through
face-to-face and electronic discussion forums, that resources for
advocacy and lobbying for the adoption of a Zimbabwean ICT policy
embracing the opinions of all stakeholders should be raised, and
that any work in organising a consultative ICT policy platform should
include an introductory research component that clearly articulates
technology issues and identifies how policy should be shaped for
it to benefit CSOs and the communities they serve.
Without a platformto
feed back and communicate discussions, those CSO invited to represent
their views could not extend their deliberations into the wider
CSO community. It became increasingly apparent that without an organised
response from the CSO sector, the process of a broad national consultation
on ICT policy would invariably leave the sector out of the process.
Hence, the birth of E-nable.
The
E-nable project strategy
The strategy was to organise CSOs that were directly involved in
ICT-based projects on the ground, to get buyin from these partners
and to develop a common agenda on how to advocate and influence
the greater ICT policy debate. This constituted the "Core
Group" consisting of six CSOs active in the ICT for development
and social justice arena. This was important to make sure there
was no duplication of effort in the sector.
Download full document
Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.
TOP
|