|
Back to Index
Supreme
Court decision ending unprecedented assault on religious freedom
welcome
Zimbabwe Lawyers for Human Rights (ZLHR)
November 20, 2012
Zimbabwe Lawyers
for Human Rights (ZLHR) welcomes the judgment delivered by the Supreme
Court on Monday 19 November 2012 in which the court upheld an appeal
by the Church of the Province of Central Africa (CPCA) led by Bishop
Chad Gandiya, and set aside two judgments that had been granted
in favour of the Nolbert Kunonga-led "Diocesan Trustees for
the Diocese of Harare" entitling them to control of Anglican
church properties.
In a judgment
delivered by Deputy Chief Justice Luke Malaba and agreed to by Judge
of Appeal Justice Vernanda Ziyambi, and Acting Judge of Appeal Justice
Yunus Omerjee, the Supreme Court ruled that the church property
which had been at the centre of the long-running dispute belongs
to the CPCA and that it has a right to an order for vindication
of its property from possessors who have no right to have it.
The Supreme
Court concluded that the court a quo was wrong to give Kunonga and
his followers the right to possess and control the property of the
CPCA without its consent and that the breakaway diocese which the
ex-communicated church leader formed had no right to continue in
possession of the congregational buildings as they departed from
the fundamental principles and standards on which the Church is
founded.
The landmark
judgment that is, in our considered view, legally sound has put
all perpetrators and potential perpetrators of rights violations
on notice: the violation of religious rights will not be tolerated
by the courts, and nobody is above the law - including those who
claim to be superior human beings by virtue of their allegiance
and association to certain political parties.
Where rights
have been gravely violated, as was so clearly the case in this matter,
this was the only possible outcome that could have been expected
from the courts.
This is a judgment
that ZLHR highly commends as consistent with the Rule of Law and
the Constitution
which guarantees freedom of assembly, association and conscience.
It offers welcome finality in a matter that had dragged on for an
unwarranted period.
The decision
reaffirms the right to freedom of thought, conscience, and religion
as enshrined in Article 18 and 30 of the Universal
Declaration of Human Rights, Article 27 of the International
Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and Article 8 of the African
Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights, all of which emphasise
that no one may be subjected to measures restricting the exercise
of these freedoms.
We recognise
that there were also some judicial officers in the courts a quo
who tried to protect the CPCA and several of the church's
parishioners, but whose court orders were flagrantly defied with
impunity, especially by State actors such as the police. This practice
must be condemned and must come to an end, both to protect institutions
and individuals who have had their rights violated, and in order
to restore the dignity of the courts and public confidence in the
justice delivery system.
In a democratic
society, such untenable failures should lead to the head of the
affected institution resigning his or her position. At the very
least, we would expect, in a democratic society, to see such public
official publicly accepting responsibility for the professional
and ethical failures of those who enforce laws on his or her behalf.
The police have
a duty to perform their functions in accordance with the law, uphold
the dignity of those before the courts, exhibit impartiality, and
avoid any kind of discrimination in order to protect the public
interest. The police also have a duty to be aware of and ensure
the protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms such as
the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion.
ZLHR trusts
that the Supreme Court ruling, which shows the court's resolute
stance in upholding the tenets of democracy and basic universally
recognised human rights, will act to provide confidence to the lower
courts to act in a similar manner to ensure such violations do not
recur, and so contribute towards putting an end to the endemic culture
of impunity in our Zimbabwean society.
Immediate and
concerted action should also be taken to investigate and prosecute
the perpetrators of the violations that, for almost six years, visited
Anglican Church parishioners including the disadvantaged young children
at CPCA-run orphanages around the country. Such action will have
the effect of contributing positively to the restoration of public
confidence in the justice delivery system.
ZLHR will continue
to monitor the situation and see whether such actions will be forthcoming,
as we believe that this has a direct bearing on whether key State
institutions are complying with the Constitution of Zimbabwe and
the Interparty
Political Agreement to restore and adhere to the principles
of the Rule of Law and guarantee the full implementation and realisation
of the freedoms of assembly and association, which in turn has implications
on regional and international confidence in the democratisation
of our country, through its inclusive transitional government.
ZLHR now looks
to the Executive organ of the State, which has the responsibility
to enforce the law, it being the one that is in charge of the State
machinery. In enforcing court orders, the Executive complies with
its responsibility to ensure that citizens enjoy the right to the
protection of the law which right is provided for in our Constitution.
A culture of
defiance of court orders severely undermines the judiciary and the
justice delivery system and entrenches a culture of impunity and
lawlessness. Such a state of affairs is not good for anyone in society.
It is therefore
hoped that compliance with the Supreme Court order should mark the
beginning of an era where both non-State actors and State actors
such as the law enforcement agents will comply with every court
order, whether palatable to them or not.
Visit the ZLHR
fact sheet
Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.
TOP
|