THE NGO NETWORK ALLIANCE PROJECT - an online community for Zimbabwean activists  
 View archive by sector
 
 
    HOME THE PROJECT DIRECTORYJOINARCHIVESEARCH E:ACTIVISMBLOGSMSFREEDOM FONELINKS CONTACT US
 

 


Back to Index

This article participates on the following special index pages:

  • New Constitution-making process - Index of articles


  • Legal Monitor - Issue 167
    Zimbabwe Lawyers for Human Rights (ZLHR)

    October 31, 2012

    Download this document
    - Acrobat PDF version (3.28MB
    )
    If you do not have the free Acrobat reader on your computer, download it from the Adobe website by clicking here.

    HIV positive prisoners case at Supreme Court

    A human rights activist denied access to treatment while in detention is finally having his day in court. Douglas Muzanenhamo was arrested on 19 February 2011 and charged with committing treason together with 44 other social justice, trade union and human rights activists, including University of Zimbabwe lecturer and International Socialist Organisation- Zimbabwe Chapter leader Munyaradzi Gwisai The State claimed they were plotting to topple the government the same way dictators in Egypt were forced down through popular mass protests. While in detention, Muzanenhamo, who is HIV positive and has lived with the condition for the past 18 years, was denied access to his life prolonging ARV drugs in contravention of Section 12 (1) of the Constitution.

    Stung by the harsh treatment, Muzanenhamo filed a constitutional application at the Supreme Court challenging the ill-treatment of people living with HIV in detention by police and prison officials. The Supreme Court has now written to Muzanenhamo informing him that the case has been set down for 15 November.

    "Take notice that the above Constitutional Application will be heard and determined by the Supreme Court of Zimbabwe at Harare on Thursday the 15th day of November 2012 at 09:30 or so soon thereafter as counsel may be heard," reads a Supreme Court letter dated 22 October.

    Tawanda Zhuwarara of Zimbabwe Lawyers for Human Rights (ZLHR) is representing Muzanenhamo. In taking up the case, ZLHR said it found it pertinent to speak out and defend the pre-trial rights of suspects in police and prison detention.

    "The landmark case questions the constitutionality of certain practices and treatment of people living with HIV in detention by police and prison officials," said Zhuwarara.

    "We are seeking an order compelling police and prison officials to respect the rights to access medication of detainees living positively with HIV/ AIDS. Every individual who is HIV positive, and gets incarcerated in their facilities, and who has notified them about his/her condition must also be given an opportunity to access anti-retroviral drugs (ARV)'s medication as prescribed by medical practitioners," said Zhuwarara. Muzanenhamo argues the meeting had nothing to do with toppling the government as he was attending a meeting to commemorate the death of an HIV/AIDS activist Navigator Mungoni. The entire treason case later spectacularly collapsed with all the accused walking free. But that was not without some suffering.

    "Functionaries of the Zimbabwe Prison Service also perpetuated Muzanenhamo's suffering when they denied him access to his medication during his detention in prison. He was also denied a balanced nutritional diet commensurate with the medical regime that he was following due to his medical condition," said Zhuwarara.

    He added: "Due to improper administration of ARVs, Muzanenhamo's health condition deteriorated rapidly and his CD4 count dropped from the normal 800 to 579. Had he stayed longer in the custody of police and prison functionaries, he would have suffered more damage to his health and wellbeing. The conditions of his arrest and incarceration caused his health to deteriorate and endangered his life.

    "The denial of ARVs to Muzanenhamo was not only cruel and inhuman but also a denial of his right to life as these drugs has ensured that he lives long. In any event suspects only lose their right to liberty while in police or prison detention and they must continue to enjoy all their other rights."

    Citizens' right to life is enshrined in the Constitution, in Article 3 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.

    Zhuwarara said without respect for the right to life, all other rights would be devoid of meaning because it is a right for which no derogation is permitted even in times of emergency that threaten the life of the nation.

    "We wish to reiterate that anyone who is suspected of having committed an offence only loses his/ her right to liberty while in custody and they must continue to enjoy all their other fundamental rights and freedoms," said the human rights lawyer.

    Download full document

    Visit the ZLHR fact sheet

    Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.

    TOP