|
Back to Index
This article participates on the following special index pages:
New Constitution-making process - Index of articles
The history of property rights and the flawed Zimbabwe Draft Constitution
Ben Freeth, The
Mike Campbell Foundation
September 30, 2012
Titled land
and the protection of property rights is not a recent phenomenon.
It has a long and fascinating history that is especially relevant
today while the highly flawed new draft constitution
in Zimbabwe is debated, causing dissent and division.
Acclaimed Russian
author Ayn Rand notes in a 1964 collection of essays, "The
Virtue of Selfishness", that the right to life is the source
of all rights - and the right to property is their only implementation.
Without property rights, no other rights are possible."
Rand also notes
that, "Since man has to sustain his life by his own effort,
the man who has no right to the product of his effort has no means
to sustain his life. The man who produces while others dispose of
his product is a slave."
In a 10-page
document released
today by Ben Freeth, executive director of the Mike Campbell Foundation,
he explores the early history of titled land and property rights,
starting with the earliest documented transfer of property rights
in Hebron in 1675 BCE - 3,678 years ago. This transaction is described
in detail Genesis, the first book in the Bible.
Freeth, a committed
Christian, lists the three Biblical principles relating to property
rights:
- The prohibition
of theft, enshrined in the 8th commandment in Exodus, "You
shall not steal" · The world ultimately belongs to
God (and not to the state) · Humans are temporary tenants
upon God's property - in effect, custodians.
With respect
to Zimbabwe's new Draft
Constitution and property rights, Freeth discusses the contentious
section on land.
This section
relates specifically to land that has been acquired already, as
well as to land to be acquired in the future. It allows land to
be taken without compensation, without the owners being allowed
a hearing in court, and on a discriminatory basis.
"Such draconian
clauses that allow theft to take place on a discriminatory basis
and without a hearing in court, need to be looked at in the light
of property rights throughout history and what the Bible says in
this regard," warns Freeth.
He explains
that at the dawn of civilisation in Samaria and Babylonia (where
the prophet Abraham had come from) the right of holding property
was already in force. Careful surveys were made and anyone who interfered
with property rights could invoke the curse of "the gods".
As a result
of the protection of property rights, sophisticated irrigation schemes
could be set up and an agricultural revolution occurred. Detailed
laws protecting private property were written, administered and
enforced - more than 4,000 years ago. Consequently, the people flourished.
Freeth says
that studies have proved that property rights are central to the
prosperity of all great civilisations, notably the ancient Greeks
and Romans. Disciplined life and hard labour on the thousands of
small, independent Greek farms developed Greek character, generated
wealth and defended their city states. This was the precursor to
private ownership in the West.
In Africa, private
ownership of land was established in ancient Egypt as early as the
middle of the third millennium BC. Long before the dawn of democracy,
laws relating to private property were in place and the sense of
private ownership was well developed.
In Zimbabwe,
the consequences of the chaotic farm invasions, which began in 2000
immediately after President Robert Mugabe lost a constitutional
referendum which would have further entrenched his power, have been
catastrophic.
Substantial,
well-run agricultural enterprises, many involving sophisticated
irrigation schemes, have been replaced largely by erratic subsistence
farming. As a result, Zimbabwe has become dependent on food aid,
ironically from the West which Zanu PF politicians malign.
In the Bible,
property rights and titled land was already a given more than 2,600
years ago. Without property rights the Bible says, the land becomes
a desolate waste, without men or animals. Zimbabwe has become a
wasteland for exactly this reason.
Title deeds
in the Bible were scrupulously protected - Jeremiah stored his in
a clay jar, which proved to be an extremely effective method of
preserving ancient documents.
In the book
of Ruth, written in 1,000 BC, over three thousand years ago, people
worked the land diligently and it was privately owned land, not
a communal system of patronage.
In Deuteronomy,
God promised curses on anyone who moved his neighbour's boundary
stone and stole his land.
The New Testament
is also very clear about the rule of law and property rights. Jesus
accepted that the private ownership of land was God-ordained for
the ordering of society and feeding of the people.
The Jubilee
laws of Leviticus 25 ensured that a family would always have land.
Furthermore, a father could not dispossess his family from the land
because of poor stewardship, carelessness or debt. Fathers were
instructed to lay up an inheritance for their children.
Every attack
on private property is an attack on a man's liberty, says leading
theologian, Rev Rushdooney.
In every dictatorship,
there is a tussle between Godly law in private ownership of property
and man's law in State ownership, notes Freeth.
If the State
becomes both sovereign and owner, it displaces God, he says. Private
property encourages the wise use of scarce resources, while nationalisation
provides no such incentive.
Nationalisation
of land in China led to starvation and the deaths of more than 70
million people over a period of four years. This was the result
of Mao spurning God's laws on property rights, cautions Freeth.
In the USA,
with only a third of the arable land of Africa, approximately 320
million tons of maize are produced annually, while Africa produces
just 60 million tonnes. In Zimbabwe since the land invasions, wheat
production has fallen by more than 90 percent.
Jesus's parable
of the good shepherd demonstrates that the owner will lay down his
life for his sheep, while the hired hand will run away if a wolf
comes, because he lacks the commitment.
"Faith
is fundamental to our spiritual lives and is synonymous with a title
deed, which is fundamental to our physical lives," says Freeth.
"It is
abundantly evident that as a country, the further erosion of property
rights - as contained in the draft constitution - offers little
hope to Zimbabweans for feeding themselves, educating their children
and developing as a nation," he contends.
"Such is
the curse of nations that choose to go against the holy and immutable
laws of God."
Freeth says
that Christians and Christian leaders are obliged to stand up and
speak out for righteousness.
"If the
highest law of the land is to go against God's law, we cannot vote
for it or urge others to vote for it."
Freeth calls
on the drafters to come up with a constitution that does not allow
theft, that does not allow discrimination and that does allow recourse
if Zimbabwean's homes and livelihoods are taken away from them -
because continued theft will not bring blessing to anyone."
He reminds Zimbabweans
that God promised to cut off Ahab and his descendents, just as Jezebel
had dispossessed Naboth of his vineyard - and his descendents.
"When we
look at what God did to Ahab and Jezebel, our politicians would
do well to listen," concluded Freeth
Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.
TOP
|