THE NGO NETWORK ALLIANCE PROJECT - an online community for Zimbabwean activists  
 View archive by sector
 
 
    HOME THE PROJECT DIRECTORYJOINARCHIVESEARCH E:ACTIVISMBLOGSMSFREEDOM FONELINKS CONTACT US
 

 


Back to Index

This article participates on the following special index pages:

  • Violence, recrimination and arrests after policeman's death in Glen View - Index of articles


  • High Court dismisses bail application for the "Glenview 29"
    Zimbabwe Human Rights Association (ZimRights)
    June 19, 2012

    High Court Judge, Justice Chinembiri Bhunu who presides over a case involving "29 Glenview residents" accused of murdering a police officer, Petros Mutedza today dismissed the bail application for accused persons citing lack of special circumstances satisfactory to the court.

    In a winding deliverance of the ruling, the judge took turns to praise and shame differences between the calibers constituting the defense counsel. He made a scathing attack on Charles Kwaramba (one of the defense counsel) for alleged lack of professionalism while at the same time praising the leading person for the team, Beatrice Mtetwa. Mr Kwaramba was attacked for allegedly slamming the Court through a DailyNews dated June 10 that quoted him saying the law is being applied unfairly. The Judge described the move as adventures to gain public sympathy after having failed to secure the release of his clients through legal procedures. He added that the move and statements were disrespectful, misinforming, reckless and flabby for a lawyer before he went on to cite a number of cases which he said bring repute to the same court. On the other hand, Mrs. Mutetwa was continuously praised for alleged adherence to legal ethics.

    Turning to the real reason for the dismissal of the application, the judge said that the entire defense outlines submitted do not meet conditions specified by Section 117 (6) of the Criminal Procedure and Evidence Act that provides for the bail release of persons accused of murdering a law enforcement agent on duty. He said the submissions do not justify the release of the accused persons and as such they will have to remain behind bars. He added that is what the law entails in such circumstance of which it is not within their mandate to change the laws.
    Despite the court having attempted to clear its name by making clarifications on the differences between the Shamva case pitting police officers who murdered a civilian and the case in point as well as bringing in the prosecution of the Mudzi suspects, we remain tempted to align to Mr. Kwaramba's take that the law is applied unfairly. We believe that all persons are born equal as enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights - hence the need for equal treatment. Over a year has passed with the liberties of these civilians curtailed.

    Visit the Zimbabwe Human Rights Association (ZimRights) fact sheet

    Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.

    TOP