|
Back to Index
Land reform and property rights in Zimbabwe
Zimbabwe Human
Rights NGO Forum
August 05, 2010
http://www.hrforumzim.com/frames/inside_frame_special.htm
Download
this document
- Acrobat
PDF version (149KB)
If you do not have the free Acrobat reader
on your computer, download it from the Adobe website by clicking
here.
Introduction
The forceful
eviction of commercial white farmers during the fast track land
reform process was arguably one of the primary drivers of Zimbabwe's
sudden economic downfall. Prior to the land seizures and only a
decade ago agriculture was the cornerstone of the economy. According
to Eric Bloch, (an independent economist in Zimbabwe), agriculture
used to provide employment for over 300,000 farm workers and a livelihood
for nearly two million people but since the 2000 land reform programme,
agriculture has plummeted, foreign exchange inflows have petered
out and there has been a breakdown of the rule of law. Eddie Cross
(another Zimbabwean independent economist), asserts that in 2000,
the total output of the agriculture industry in Zimbabwe was 4.3
million tonnes of agricultural products worth at today's prices
US$3.347billion. In 2009 it declined to 1.348 million tonnes of
products worth US$1 billion, a decline of 69% in volume and a decline
of 70% in value.
For many years dependant
upon food aid programmes to feed its population. No one knows when
the farm invasions will come to an end. The Government of Zimbabwe
(GoZ) has condoned these invasions by its failure to protect and
uphold the rights of the affected farmers to end the violence and
to bring the perpetrators to justice. Thus these acts and omissions
constitute violations of the Constitution of Zimbabwe and internationally
recognized legal instruments that protect human rights.
Zimbabwe was
known as the "bread basket" of Africa endowed with productive
farmland, rich in raw materials and it grew enough food to feed
its people and export the rest. However following the agrarian reform
it is now Craig Richardson asserts that, Zimbabwe provides a compelling
case study of the perils of ignoring the rule of law and property
rights when implementing land reforms. Protected property rights
are crucial for economic growth and once those rights are taken
away an economy is prone to collapse. There have been arguments
suggesting that the land reform process has been beneficial. The
most contentious support came from respected African scholar, Mahmoud
Mamdani, who argued that the land reform process was a final
closure in the de-colonization project. Another scholar, Scoones
proposed that there were signs that land reform was having beneficial
effects especially on smallholder farmers, which submission was
disputed by other scholars.
The Land Reform
and Property Rights in Zimbabwe of 2010 is a sequel report to the
2007, Adding Insult to Injury,
a preliminary report on human rights violations on commercial farms
2000-2005. Whereas the previous report was a quantitative enquiry,
this report is qualitative research oriented based on a review of
secondary data. Secondary research, also known as desk research,
involves the collation and synthesis of existing research. The aim
of secondary research is to determine what is known already and
what new data is required. Several documented reports have concentrated
on violent land invasions from 2000-2005 and very little has been
reported on violent land invasions after 2007. Therefore this report
tries to fill that gap by focusing on violations on farmers and
farm workers' right to property, which have continued unabated.
Download
full document
Visit the Zimbabwe
Human Rights NGO Forum fact
sheet
Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.
TOP
|