|
Back to Index
Destructive
engagement: Violence, mediation and politics in Zimbabwe
Solidarity Peace Trust
July 10, 2007
Download
this document
- Word
97 version (565KB)
- Acrobat
PDF version (582KB)
If you do not have the free Acrobat reader
on your computer, download it from the Adobe website by clicking
here.
Contents
- Introduction
- 11 March
and its aftermath
- The response
of SADC
- Mugabe prepares
for 2008 election
- Methodology
- Findings
- Demographics
- Violations
against leadership
- Abductions
and targeted home assaults
- Significance
of state abuses in private homes Public places
- Funeral Wake
of Gift Tandare
- Attacks
on lawyers
- Perpetrators
- State-instigated
assaults outside of police stations
- MDC: "terror"
activities
- Reported
violations and medical findings
- Torture
- Conclusion
and recommendations
Summary
The violence
of 11 March and the months following in Zimbabwe indicated increased
levels of state repression against dissenting voices in the country.
Against the background of an enormous erosion of the political legitimacy
of the ruling party, and an economy in freefall, the state has responded
with characteristic brutality and contempt for its citizenry. Several
features have marked the recent human rights abuses by the Zimbabwean
state:
- Targeted
attacks against the leadership of the MDC and the civic movement.
A
- A deliberate
strategy of attacking the Tsvangirai formation of the MDC while
showing leniency to the Mutambara formation in order to exacerbate
the existing tensions between the two groups.
- Increased
attacks in the homes of the activists, thus bringing fear into
the intimate spaces of opposition members.
- The sense
of impunity felt by the perpetrators as they conducted their attacks
both in private and public spaces.
- In 90% of
the attacks the perpetrators involved government agencies such
as the police, CIO, CID, and army.
- 85% of the
cases reported were in Harare, one of the two major urban areas
considered to be 'opposition territory.'
- The state
has continued in its attempts to criminalise the opposition MDC
through accusations that it is a 'terrorist organisation',
dedicated to 'regime change' as part of a global imperial
strategy. Thus far the Zimbabwean state has provided little evidence
to back up this claim.
In the aftermath
of the violence of March 11th the SADC initiated a mediation effort
led by RSA President Thabo Mbeki, in order to find a negotiated
solution to the Zimbabwean crisis. As this mediation continues,
there are key elements that need to be a central part of any solution
to the current situation:
- There must
be an end to the state-led violence if there is to be any chance
of a free and fair election process in 2008.
- The discussions
around a new constitution must allow for transitional justice
issues around truth and justice questions, to be dealt with as
early in a political transition as possible. The culture of impunity
on human rights abuses in Zimbabwe must stop.
Along with the
need for broad economic reform, the human rights question must also
form a central part of the process of political transformation in
the country. The two issues must not be separated, nor can human
rights concerns be deferred while economic development challenges
are confronted.
Download full document
Visit the Solidarity
Peace Trust fact
sheet
Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.
TOP
|