|
Back to Index
This article participates on the following special index pages:
Index of articles surrounding the debate of the Domestic Violence Bill
"A
Woman's Place is in the Home?" - Gender Based
Violence and Opposition Politics in Zimbabwe
Zimbabwe Human Rights NGO Forum
December 08, 2006
Download
this document
- Word
97 version (155KB)
- Acrobat
PDF version (162KB)
If you do not have the free Acrobat reader
on your computer, download it from the Adobe website by clicking
here.
Introduction
'Women
throughout the world face systemic attacks on their human rights
and chronic, routinized and legal discrimination and violence,
much of it justified through cultural and religious arguments.
Even where discrimination is prohibited it often persists in practice.
By any reasonable measure, state failure to uphold women's
rights as full and equal citizens sends an unmistakably clear
message to the broader community that women's lives matter
less, and that violence and discrimination against them is acceptable.1
Gender stereotyping,
usually associated with a society which identifies with patriarchal
norms, is easily identified as prevalent in Zimbabwe where it often
presents itself under the guise of traditional African or conservative
Christian values.2 On several
occasions in post-independent Zimbabwe such values have been expressed
by parliamentarians in the course of debating gender-focused legislation.
The most recent of many available examples arose in a parliamentary
debate over a Bill aimed at curbing domestic violence. The following
excerpt from a press article on the debate, quoting MP Timothy Mubhawu3
, is illustrative:
"I stand
here representing God Almighty. Women are not equal to men,"
[Mubhawu] said amid jeers from women parliamentarians. "It
is a dangerous Bill and let it be known in Zimbabwe that the right,
privilege and status of men is gone. I stand here alone and say
this Bill should not be passed in this House. It is a diabolic
Bill. Our powers are being usurped in daylight in this House."
The proposed law, Mr. Mubhawu said, was crafted in a manner that
promoted western cultural values. . . . . Mr. Mubhawu said the
issue of proper dressing by women should also be addressed in
the Bill as "some of the dressing by women is too inviting."
Women in positions of authority, he said, should be role models
in their marriages. "Women leaders in Government, judiciary
and Parliament should be exemplary by at least marrying,"
he said4.
In Zimbabwe,
despite equality clauses in the country's Constitution and
the fact that Zimbabwe is a signatory to CEDAW5,
the perception of women as in some way "belonging" to
men or beholden to them remains strong6
. The Domestic Violence bill proved controversial precisely because
of the perception amongst some men that they should, and indeed
ought, to physically "discipline" their wives when the
occasion requires7. While
the Legal Age of Majority Act in 1982 removed the status of women
as perpetual minors under the guardianship of either father or husband,
the legislation did not, of course, immediately alter this traditional
perception8. It is still
the case that instances of rape in the rural areas are dealt with
outside of the courts by village leaders. Frequently, the settlement
requires the rapist or his family to pay compensation, not to the
woman or girl, but to her father. The compensation which is paid
is regarded as ameliorating what would be a reduced bride price
"roora" paid to the bride's father on account
of the violation. As will be seen below, this "proprietal"
ethos in relation to women has a sinister dimension in facets of
political violence against women.
Both civil conflict and internal displacement have been key characteristics
of Zimbabwe since 1999. The source of internal displacement has
been twofold, firstly, through the displacement of farm labour during
the invasion of white-owned farmland from early 2000 to 2005 and
secondly through the now-notorious "urban clean-up"
operation called "Operation Murambatsvina"9
which saw the demolition of homes and the displacement of an estimated
700 000 people. It has been noted that women and children, are the
most common victims in situations where organized violence and torture
become prevalent and are frequently the first victims in civil conflict.
They are also the most greatly affected in cases of internal displacement.
This report, examining the violent and turbulent years between 2000
and 2006, shows that Zimbabwe has been no exception in this regard.
Download
full document
Visit the Zimbabwe Human Rights NGO Forum fact
sheet
1. In War as
in Peace: Sexual Violence and Women's Status' Human
Rights Watch Report 2004
2. A useful outline of traditional practices appears in a Country
Report on gender based violence by the Zimbabwe Attorney-General's
Office available at: http://www.unafei.or.jp/english/pdf/PDF_rms/no69/11_P144-158.pdf
accessed 21/1/06 accessed 21/11/06.
3. Interestingly, Mubhawu is believed by fellow female MDC legislator
Trudy Stevenson to have orchestrated the severe assault to which
she was subjected in 2006, though he was acquitted of the charges
brought against him in this regard.
4. The Herald (Zimbabwe) Debate on Domestic Violence Bill Persists
October 05, 2006
5.Convention on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women.
6. See fig 2 above.
7. UNICEF-Zimbabwe UNICEF denounces violence against women and calls
on all Zimbabweans to halt the horror. March 01, 2006.
8. See generally AFROL Gender profiles at:
http://www.afrol.com/Categories/Women/profiles/zimbabwe_women.htm
accessed 21/11/06
See generally AFROL Gender profiles at: http://www.afrol.com/Categories/Women/profiles/zimbabwe_women.htm
accessed 21/11/06
9. A literal translation of the term would be "drive
out filth".
Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.
TOP
|