| |
Back to Index
Creation
of the Zimbabwe Human Rights Commission
Zimbabwe Human
Rights Association (Zimrights)
March 30, 2006
The
Zimbabwe Human Rights Association (ZimRights) is following with
keen interest reports of proposals by government to set up a Human
Rights Commission. According to press reports, the proposed Commission
will be mandated to receive and investigate cases of human rights
abuses, ensure appropriate redress for proven cases, undertake public
awareness programmes through education and information and to co-operate
with the United Nations, the African Union and other regional and
international human rights institutions, among other things. It
is implied in this proposal that the Commission will serve as an
additional body of local remedies available to victims of human
rights violations before they can evoke the mechanisms of regional
and international bodies such as the African Commission for Human
and Peoples’ Rights or the United Nations Human Rights Commission.
The proposal also suggests that all civil society organisations
working in the field of human rights be required to be affiliates
of that Commission.
Under
normal circumstances the establishment of such a Commission would
be most welcome if its existence would ensure the people of Zimbabwe
an enhanced means by which their rights can be guaranteed and protected.
However, ZimRights very much doubts that this Commission will be
effective for the following reasons:
- The Commission
is likely to be a toothless institution which makes recommendations
which will not bind the state. A number of Commissions, such
as the Sandura Commission have been set up in the past but nothing
positive was achieved. Closer home, in the human rights field,
we have the Office of the Ombudsman which in the same proposed
amendment will be renamed the Office of the Public Protector.
This institution was set up through the Zimbabwean Constitution
to investigate malpractices by the civil service including the
army and the police but one cannot even put a single finger
on anything it has accomplished since independence. If government
can brazenly ignore court orders, what more the findings and
recommendations of a commission?
- The proposal
that civil society organisations be affiliated to the commission
is most likely being steered by the government’s desire to muzzle
and reign in NGOs which the government views as hostile. This
conclusion is justified in light if recent intensified attacks
on human rights NGOs by government officials as reported in
the state-controlled press. We have all witnessed how the Media
and Information Commission set up under AIPPA has dealt a terrible
blow to the independent media in Zimbabwe. Civil society organisations
can suffer the same fate.
- The government
has reacted with much vitriol to reports produced by the two
United Nations personnel, Ms Anna Kajumulo Tibaijuka and Mr.
Jan Egeland, who have visited the country to establish the human
rights situation on the ground. The government has also castigated
reports produced by the African Commission on Human and People’s
Rights. One wonders how effective a Commission set up by such
a government would be.
- Government
has failed and/or deliberately failed to domesticate international
human rights instruments to which it is a signatory. If government
were serious at all about promoting human rights and redressing
human rights abuses, surely the first logical step would be
to domesticate international human rights instruments to which
it is a signatory.
- Government
only has to put its house in order first by repealing oppressive
pieces of legislation such as the Access
to Information and Protection of Privacy Act (AIPPA), Public
Order and Security Act (POSA), the Broadcasting
Services Act (BSA), and Constitutional
Amendment No. 17, among others. These laws individually
and collectively have been used to deny citizens, especially
journalists and human rights defenders, their rights.
In
the past, ZimRights and many other local human rights groups have
highlighted human rights violation to the government but nothing
has been done to redress such issues. Therefore, ZimRights does
not see how the coming in of the Commission will help unless, of
course, if the Government is saying human rights violations are
only beginning now.
ZimRights
is of the opinion that government does not need to repeal the Constitution
to allow for the establishment of the Human Rights Commission. What
is desirable is for government to repeal Section 111B of the Constitution
in its totality so that international treaties and agreements are
domesticated as soon as government accedes to or ratifies them.
The
establishment of a human rights commission should be for the promotion
and defense of people’s rights and freedoms and not as a public
relations gimmick to spruce up the battered image of the government.
Only a genuine democracy can guarantee the enjoyment of human rights
by all in Zimbabwe, and that should be the starting point.
Visit
the ZimRights fact
sheet
Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.
TOP
|