|
Back to Index
African
Union Assembly Summit in Khartoum: An important opportunity to make
progress on the protection of human rights in Africa
Amnesty
International (AI)
AI Index: IOR 30/001/2006 (Public)
News Service No: 011
January
17, 2006
http://web.amnesty.org/library/Index/ENGIOR300012006
In advance of
the 6th Ordinary Session of the African Union (AU) Assembly in Khartoum
Sudan, between 23 and 24 January 2006, Amnesty International today
called on African leaders to prioritise and make progress on the
protection of human rights throughout the continent. The adoption
of the Constitutive Act of the AU in 2000 containing fine statements
on the promotion and protection of human rights raised expectations
that African leaders were prepared to take a public stand against
abuses of human rights in member states, and to reverse the deteriorating
human rights conditions that have characterised many parts of the
region for decades.
Although some
limited steps have been taken to implement the human rights mandate
of the AU, grave human rights violations, including rape, torture
and unlawful killings continued to be committed in many parts of
Africa. Impunity for human rights violations remained widespread,
despite some international and continental efforts to address the
problem. There are continuing human rights problems in Darfur (Sudan)
and Zimbabwe, among other countries in the continent. Furthermore,
the establishment and operationalization of the African Court on
Human and Peoples' Rights continued to be delayed, two years after
the Protocol establishing it had entered into force.
It is important
for the African leaders meeting in Khartoum to demonstrate that
they have the political will to translate their expressed commitments
into reality. The following recommendations highlight some areas
which the AU Assembly should consider if it is to make progress
towards the promotion and protection of human rights and fundamental
freedoms across the region.
Addressing
impunity across the region
One
of the fundamental objectives of the Constitutive Act of the AU
is to condemn and reject impunity.
However, despite
widespread and systematic violations of human rights, most perpetrators
were not held to account, while victims have been frequently denied
an effective remedy. In the past decades, numerous human rights
abuses have plagued many parts of Africa. African men, women and
children have been victims of genocide, war crimes, crimes against
humanity and other crimes recognized under international law.
Of the 53 AU
member states, 43 have signed or ratified the Rome Statute of the
International Criminal Court (Rome Statute), including Chad and
Senegal, which bars any immunity, including official capacity as
head of state or government, from prosecutions of crimes under its
jurisdiction. The Rome Statute envisages trials of heads of state,
former heads of state and other current or former government officials
in The Hague before the International Criminal Court or in any national
court exercising its jurisdiction over crimes under international
law
Amnesty International
is aware that the Republic of Senegal has proposed that the AU Assembly
meeting in Khartoum consider the legal action that may be taken
to bring the former President of Chad, Hissène Habré,
to justice for serious violations of human rights he committed while
in power. This request followed complaints lodged by some of his
victims, initially in Senegal and then in Belgium, and subsequent
indictment by a Belgian judge.
Amnesty International
urges the AU Assembly to ensure that any decision it takes on the
matter is consistent with member states obligations as mentioned
above. It is important for African victims to see justice done in
this case. Taking a decision on the side of justice and lending
its authority to the promotion and protection of human rights will
enhance the credibility of the AU, and will add value to the very
reasons that led Africa to take the initiative to establish the
International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, the Special Court for
Sierra Leone, as well as to play a decisive role in the establishment
of the International Criminal Court.
The Senegalese
Minister of Foreign Affairs, Cheikh Tidiane Gadio, said on 27 November
2005 that Senegal "is very sensitive to the complaints of the victims
who are demanding justice and will refrain from doing anything which
could mean that Mr Hissène Habré is not brought to
justice". The Chadian authorities have also publicly stated that
Hissène Habré could not claim any type of immunity
from extradition in the case of compliance with proceedings brought
against him in a foreign court for crimes under international law.
Amnesty International
fully supports these positions, and urges the AU Assembly to demonstrate
leadership in favour of accountability, in line with the spirit
and letter of the Constitutive Act, the African Charter on Human
and Peoples' Rights and other international standards to which AU
members are committed by ensuring that Senegal immediately fulfil
its responsibilities under international law to extradite Hissène
Habré to answer the charges that have been brought against
him.
Darfur (Sudan)
Amnesty
International acknowledges the critical role being played by the
AU in finding solutions to the conflict in Darfur, both by mediating
between the parties in the conflict and by deploying peacekeeping
forces with the mandate of monitoring the ceasefire agreement and
protecting civilians. Despite these efforts, as remarked by the
UN Secretary General in its latest monthly report on Darfur to the
Security Council, "reports from the ground confirm the marked deterioration
in the situation since September [...] Large-scale attacks against
civilians continue, women and girls are being raped by armed groups,
yet more villages are being burned, and thousands more are being
driven from their homes""
Amnesty International
believes that the AU must clearly state to the Sudanese government
and armed groups that the peacekeeping mission in Darfur intends
to fulfil its mandate and that it will take action to protect civilians
wherever they are in danger.
The deterioration
of the human rights and humanitarian situation in Darfur has prompted
the United Nations and the AU to reassess its response to the conflict.
Amnesty International believes that the African Mission in Sudan
(AMIS) or any other peacekeeping mission in Darfur must be given
manpower, resources and logistics so that it can be deployed rapidly
to all areas in Darfur where civilians are under threat. Although
the AU needs international support to ensure this, it must itself
take primary responsibility on the effective operation of AMIS.
Furthermore,
AMIS or any peacekeeping mission in Darfur should investigate violations
of international humanitarian law and human rights law by government
forces or armed groups and should be able to publish its reports
independently. The AU should immediately conclude and put into effect
the cooperation agreement with the International Criminal Court
to ensure that those suspected of crimes under international law
can be investigated and prosecuted.
Zimbabwe
Amnesty
International remained gravely concerned by the continuing violations
of human rights and the almost absolute impunity enjoyed by the
perpetrators in Zimbabwe. On 16 November 2005, Amnesty International
together with other international non-governmental organizations
(NGOs) and African civil society organizations published an appeal
addressed to the AU to express concern at the deteriorating human
rights situation in Zimbabwe, including the situation of hundreds
of thousands of internally displaced persons as result of the forced
evictions and demolitions carried out by the government.
At its 38th
Ordinary Session in November 2005, the African Commission on Human
and Peoples' Rights condemned the deteriorating human rights situation
in Zimbabwe. In its resolution, the African Commission urges "the
government of Zimbabwe to implement without further delay the recommendations
contained in the African Commission Report of the 2002 Fact-Finding
Mission to Zimbabwe and the recommendations in the July 2005 Report
of the UN Special Envoy on Human Settlement Issues" and makes a
series of recommendations to improve respect for human rights in
the country, including the right to freedom of expression, association
and assembly and the independence of the judiciary.
Amnesty International
urges the AU to publicly call on the government of Zimbabwe to respect
its obligations under the African Charter on Human and Peoples'
Rights and to encourage it to comply with the recommendations contained
in the African Commission's resolution. Amnesty International also
calls on the AU to renew the mandate of its Envoy to Zimbabwe to
investigate the human rights implications and humanitarian consequences
of the forced evictions and demolitions.
African Court
on Human and Peoples' Rights
Amnesty
International remained seriously concerned that the African Court
on Human and Peoples' Rights has still not been established two
years after the entry into force of the Protocol on 25 January 2004.
Amnesty International is also concerned that, as of 14 December
2005, only 22 of the 53 AU member states have ratified the Protocol.
Of these, only Burkina Faso has made the declaration under Article
34(6) of the Protocol, granting individuals and non-governmental
organizations direct access to the Court.
However, Amnesty
International welcomes the inclusion on the AU Assembly agenda the
election of the eleven judges to the Court. We urge the AU Assembly
to consider the following in the election of judges and in its efforts
to make the Court operational and effective:
- The AU Assembly
should ensure that only judges of the highest quality, commitment
and integrity are elected to the Court.
- The AU Assembly
should ensure a fair representation of men and women from the
main regions and legal systems of Africa in the election of judges.
- Once fully
established, the AU Assembly should ensure that essential human
and financial resources are provided to the Court, so that it
is able to carry out its functions independently and effectively.
- The AU Assembly
should encourage member states that have not yet done so, to ratify
the Protocol without further delay. States should also make the
declaration under Article 34(6) of the Protocol.
Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.
TOP
|