THE NGO NETWORK ALLIANCE PROJECT - an online community for Zimbabwean activists  
 View archive by sector
 
 
    HOME THE PROJECT DIRECTORYJOINARCHIVESEARCH E:ACTIVISMBLOGSMSFREEDOM FONELINKS CONTACT US
 

 


Back to Index

Commemorating World Human Rights Day
Zimbabwe Human Rights NGO Forum
December 10, 2005

The Zimbabwe Human Rights NGO Forum (Human Rights Forum) is a coalition of 16 member organisations. It has been in existence since January 1998 when organisations working in the field of human rights joined to provide legal and psychosocial assistance to the victims of the January 1998 food riots. The Human Rights Forum has since expanded its objectives to assist victims of organized violence. The Forum views organized violence as:

"the inter-human infliction of significant avoidable pain and suffering by an organized group according to a declared or implied strategy and/or system of ideas and attitudes. It comprises any violent action, which is unacceptable by general human standards, and relates to the victims’ mental and physical well being".

On 10 December 1948 the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) adopted the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) as it saw the UDHR as

"a major step in the advancement of civilisation at the international and national levels"

From then on, 10 December has come to be recognised as World Human Rights Day.

As the world commemorates World Human Rights Day, the Human Rights Forum notes with concern a number of developments in 2005 in Zimbabwe that have led to some serious violations of human rights throughout the country.

Elections
General Elections were held on 31 March 2005 in an electoral climate of apathy as compared to prior elections. The election witnessed less physical violence perpetrated against opposition members/supporters than in previous ones. The reduction in physical violence did not mean however that the elections would be free and fair. Physical violence was substituted by psychological violence where the electorate was generally in a state of fear. There was also reported gerrymandering of constituencies by the Delimitation Commission appointed by the President in consultation with the Judicial Services Commission, in September 2004. The Commission comprised of 3 ZANU-PF MP’s led by Justice George Chiweshe. The composition of the Delimitation Commission was not representative of all political parties and it raised concerns amongst the opposition that electoral boundaries would be altered in the ruling party’s favour.

These concerns proved well founded because towards the end of December 2004 the Commission presented its report in which it had increased the number of constituencies in ZANU-PF strongholds and reduced them in areas where the MDC enjoys support. In Manicaland, Mashonaland East and West where ZANU-PF enjoys popular support, 3 constituencies were added and in Harare and Matebeleland South Provinces, opposition MDC strongholds, 2 constituencies were lost. The rationale provided by the Delimitation Commission was that there had been urban-rural migration since the last elections but they did not cite figures from the 2004 census, which indicated that the population of the city of Harare had in fact increased by 500 000. Postal votes were limited and the law against dual citizenship also disenfranchised many Zimbabweans of Malawian decent and whites. The Electoral Commission, which is appointed by the President and seen to be partial, supervised the elections. No organization that gave an adverse report of the 2000 and 2002 elections was invited to monitor or observe the 2005 general elections. Food was also politicised. Due to the critical food shortages that were prevailing before, during and after the elections, there was a general perception that food aid was being given only to ZANU-PF supporters by the Government. Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs, Abednico Ncube reportedly told villagers in Matebeleland that maize,

"would be available only to those who dump the opposition and work with ZANU-PF"

Because of the above reasons, the Human Rights Forum notes with concern that Zimbabwe has not adhered to the SADC Principles and Guidelines governing democratic elections and the operating environment shows that the 2005 general elections were neither free nor fair. The Human Rights Forum further condemns the post election retribution that took place in the country mainly perpetrated by the ruling ZANU-PF.

The Gutu North by-election was held on 26 November 2005. No cases of physical violence were reported before and during the election period. However cases of politicisation of food distribution were reported during the campaigning period. It is alleged that suspected MDC supporters were denied the opportunity to purchase grain that was being sold by the Grain marketing Board (GMB). Furthermore, it is reported that the electorate was threatened with the halting of grain distribution if they did not vote for the ruling party. It was observed that on the voting day, some polling stations had an unusually high number of voters as compared to others. This suggests that voters had been directed to specific polling stations for political reasons. There were also a high number of assisted voters some of whom had been reportedly told to state that they were illiterate. The Forum notes with concern that elections in Zimbabwe continue to be conducted in an environment that is not free and fair.

Operation Murambatsvina
Starting from 22 May 2005, in a military style operation, often conducted in the early hours of the morning without warning, police officers, dressed in riot kit and armed with automatic firearms loaded with live ammunition, descended on poor urban people in high density suburbs in and around towns and cities all over Zimbabwe in an operation code named Operation Murambatsvina (reject the filth)/Operation Restore Order. The police bulldozed, smashed and burned structures housing many thousands of poor urban dwellers, some of whom had valid leases to occupy the properties. Operation Murambatsvina, which was castigated by civil society, the UN Special Envoy Mrs. Anna Kajimulo Tibaijuka and the UN Secretary General Koffi Annan as a

"catastrophic injustice carried out indiscriminately and with disquieting indifference to human suffering"

led to an estimated 700 000 people losing either their homes, their source of livelihood or both and 2.4 million people being indirectly affected in varying degrees. Operation Murambatsvina was a man-made national disaster. This Operation continued to take place despite pleas by a whole succession of local and international church bodies and Non-Governmental Organisations (NGO’s) for Government to halt it. It continued after the arrival, on 27 June 2005, of the Special Envoy sent by the United Nations to investigate what was happening, despite a public announcement at that time that the Operation had ended. It also did not stop after the public release of the highly critical Report of the Special Envoy on 22 July 2005, in which one of the main recommendations was that the Operation should immediately be halted. On 27 July 2005, the Acting President Joyce Mujuru announced at a meeting that Operation Murambatsvina was now over.

The operation violated a plethora of economic and social rights, including the right to a family unit, health, shelter, food and education. Operation Garikayi, which Government set up to undo the evils of Operation Murambatsvina is inadequately funded and has not properly taken off.

Constitutional Amendment Act No 17
The Constitutional Amendment Act (No 17) was passed into law on 14 September 2005 after Presidential assent despite widespread criticism from civil society that this Act would violate many rights including the rights to freedom of movement, the right to property and the right to the due process of the law. Article 2 of the Act legislates for the Government to acquire agricultural land for resettlement purposes. The Human Rights Forum notes with concern the absence in the Act of the definition of "agricultural land", which gives the state wide powers as to what land will be acquired. Article 2, subsection (3) takes away the right of appeal as regards the acquisition of one’s land. It states that

"a person having any right to or interest in the land acquired by Government shall not apply to a court to challenge the acquisition of the land by the state and no court shall entertain such challenge".

The only appeal allowed is to challenge the amount of compensation on improvements on the land and not the acquisition itself. The right to appeal is protected under national and international law and should be respected for the rule of law to be upheld. The Forum notes with concern that this clause in the Constitutional Amendment Act No 17 violates Zimbabwe’s international obligations, more particularly Article 7 (1) of the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights, which states that

"every individual shall have the right to have his cause heard".

This right includes

"the right to appeal to competent national organs against acts violating his fundamental rights as recognized and guaranteed by conventions, laws, regulations and customs in force."

Freedom of movement is restricted by Article 3 of the Act, which states that people can be restricted from travelling

"in the national interest, or in the interests of defence, public safety, public order, public morality, public health, the public interest or the economic interests of the state".

There are widespread fears in civil society and the opposition that this clause will be used to restrict travel on those who are viewed to be against ZANU-PF. In the absence of definitions, this clause gives the state unfettered power to do as it pleases in restricting the movement of civil society groups and opposition groups. The Forum urges the Government to repeal this autocratic legislation.

The Act also legislates for a Senate, which held its elections on 26 November 2005. While a senate is generally considered to enhance democracy, the Forum is concerned about the funding of such a venture, more so in Zimbabwe where there is a huge economic crisis. The Forum feels that the costs attaching to the Senate are a totally unjustified burden on the populace at this time.

African Commission On Human And Peoples’ Rights (ACHPR)
The African Commission on Human and People’s Rights (ACHPR) sent a Fact-finding Mission to Zimbabwe in 2002 following which a report was compiled which noted that

"although, there was insufficient evidence to suggest an orchestrated policy of abuse by the Government... Government by failing to act soon enough and firmly enough against those guilty of gross criminal acts abdicated its responsibility to observe the rule of law and prevent human rights abuses".

The Human Rights Forum notes with concern the continued onslaught on dissenting voices through draconian legislation such as the Public Order and Security Act (POSA), the Access to Information and Protection of Privacy Act (AIPPA) and now the Constitutional Amendment Act no 17.

In confirmation of this, the fact-finding mission of the ACHPR noted that:

"there has been a flurry of new legislation and the revival of the old laws used under the Smith Rhodesian regime to control, manipulate public opinion and limit civil liberties. Zimbabwean police make routine use of the Public Order and Security Act (POSA), to arrest and detain civil society leaders, members of the opposition and others perceived as supportive of them."

The Human Rights Forum notes with great concern that the recommendations of the ACHPR Fact-finding Mission are yet to be implemented 3 years on. The Forum further deplores the treatment by the Government of the ACHPR envoy who had been mandated by the African Union (AU) to evaluate Operation Murambatsvina.

Noting that Zimbabwe ‘is a divided society’ in need of assistance to withdraw from its potentially dangerous situation, the Mission made the following recommendations:

  • National Dialogue and Reconciliation: religious organisations are best placed to play the lead role in reconciling and mediating in dialogue between the different groups in Zimbabwe’s divided society.
  • Creating an Environment Conducive to Democracy and Human Rights: sections of AIPPA that prohibit free expression of public opinion and sections of POSA should be repealed or reviewed.
  • Independent National Institutions: human rights violations and corruption could be prevented by putting in place independent national institutions to guard against them such as an independent office to "receive and investigate complaints against the police."
  • Independence of the Judiciary: the independence of the judiciary should be ensured by refraining from political attacks on its members and obeying judicial orders.
  • A Professional Police Service: efforts should be made to ‘avoid any further politicisation of the police service’ and the police service ‘should never be at the service of any political party but must at all times seek to abide by the values of the Constitution and enforce the law without fear or favour’.
  • The Media: a climate conducive to freedom of expression in Zimbabwe should be created and POSA and AIPPA be amended to meet international standards for freedom of expression.

Members of the Zimbabwe Human Rights NGO Forum:

Visit the Zimbabwe Human Rights NGO Forum fact sheet

Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.

TOP