| |
Back to Index
Submissions
to the Portfolio Committee on Justice, Legal and Parliamentary Affairs
Zimbabwe Lawyers For Human Rights (ZLHR)
August 04, 2005
Download
this document
- Word
97 version (70KB)
- Acrobat
PDF version (107KB)
If you do not have the free Acrobat reader
on your computer, download it from the Adobe website by clicking
here.
Introduction
The Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 17) Bill, 2005 ("the
Amendment Bill") was gazetted on 15 July 2005 and is intended
to amend the Constitution of Zimbabwe in several respects. It is
the view of Zimbabwe Lawyers for Human Rights (ZLHR) that the Bill
raises serious concerns, and the Portfolio Committee on Justice,
Legal and Parliamentary Affairs ("the Committee") should
be encouraged to present an adverse report to Parliament, based
on the analysis, conclusions and recommendations that appear below.
The principle
of constitutionalism1
In the most minimal terms a "constitution" consists of
a set of rules or norms creating, structuring and defining the limits
of, government power or authority. This requires not only that there
are rules creating legislative, executive and judicial powers, but
that these rules impose limits on those powers. The only time-tested
manner of ensuring such limits is through a constitutional structure
which ensures separation of powers, checks and balances, independent
constitutional review by an independent Judiciary, and protection
of individual rights. This, in essence, is the principle of constitutionalism.
Constitutionalism
is a necessary foundation for the rule of law. Laws must exist to
place meaningful constraints on government behaviour, and must allow
for established procedures to be available, consistently implemented
and enforced in order to prevent arbitrary action, which leads to
a loss of authority in the eyes of the people who the government
seeks to serve.
Constitutionalism
does not weaken the government; to the contrary, it allows the government
to be stronger and more stable, as it is seen as more responsible,
more consistent, more predictable, more just, and more respected.
In turn, constitutionalism
cannot exist without the rule of law. if laws are exclusively the
results of the "sheer will" of the legislators, there
can be no constitutionalism. For a constitutional structure of separation
of powers, checks and balances and rights protection to exist, there
must be some limits on what the legislators can do. This limit is
imposed by the rule of law and implemented through an independent
judiciary, the process of judicial review, and the notion that law
is, at least in part, the product of independent legal reasoning
by judges.
A further important
feature of constitutionalism is that the rules imposing limits upon
government power must be in some way be entrenched, either by law
or by way of "constitutional convention". Those whose
powers are constitutionally limited - i.e., the organs of government
- must not be legally entitled to change or expunge those limits
at their pleasure. Were a government entitled, at its pleasure,
to change the very terms of its constitutional limitations, it is
questionable whether there would, in reality, be any such limitations.
What is clear
from the contents, intent and purposes of the Amendment Bill is
that there has been a general failure to subscribe to this fundamental
principle.
The Amendment
Bill seeks to effectively remove the fundamental rights to property
[section 16], secure protection of the law [section 18(1) and (9)]
and freedom of movement [section 23] from the people of Zimbabwe
who rely on the Constitution for protection against unchecked State
action. As an organisation whose primary objective is to foster
a culture of human rights in Zimbabwe and promote and protect human
rights as enshrined in the Constitution of Zimbabwe and international
and regional human rights instruments to which Zimbabwe is a State
Party, ZLHR finds these implications in particular to be of great
concern.
1. The arguments
put forward in this section draw upon comments to be found in the
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy and Li, B. Constitutionalism and
the Rule of Law Perspectives, Volume 2, No. 1
Download
full document
Visit the ZLHR
fact sheet
Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.
TOP
|