Back to Index
Zimbabwe:
Power and hunger - violations of the right to food
Amnesty International
October 21, 2004
http://web.amnesty.org/library/Index/ENGAFR460262004?open&of=ENG-ZWE
Download this
report
- Word
version (298KB)
- Acrobat
PDF version (648KB)
If you do not have the free Acrobat reader
on your computer, download it from the Adobe website by clicking
here.
View
previous Amnesty document on this subject
Introduction
Amnesty International has documented the deterioration in the
human rights situation in Zimbabwe in numerous reports. Since 2000
the government has used its supporters and state agents to pursue
a campaign of repression, aimed at eliminating opposition and silencing
dissent. State-sponsored intimidation, arbitrary arrest, torture
and attacks on supporters of the political opposition, human rights
defenders and the independent media have escalated sharply. Laws
have been introduced which restrict the rights to freedom of expression,
association and assembly, and prevent scrutiny of the government's
actions.
The escalation
in human rights violations has taken place against a backdrop of
severe economic decline and acute food insecurity. Since 2002 millions
of people in Zimbabwe have been dependent on local and international
aid programmes for their access to food; tens of thousands, however,
are reported to have gone hungry, unable to gain access to food
for a variety of reasons. The change in Zimbabwe's food security
situation has been dramatic. Until 2000 the country regularly produced
surplus grain for export (much of this to the rest of the region).
At this time the World Food Programme's (WFP) only operation in
Zimbabwe was a procurement office from where it purchased Zimbabwean
grain for food aid programmes elsewhere in Africa.
While climatic
factors, the HIV/AIDS pandemic and economic decline have all contributed
to the magnitude of food insecurity experienced in Zimbabwe, food
security experts, including the WFP and the Food and Agriculture
Organization (FAO), have stated that government policies and practices
have also been a factor in the food crisis. The way in which the
government's "fast-track land reform programme" has been implemented
is a significant factor affecting domestic food production and the
ability of millions of people in Zimbabwe to access adequate food.
The fast-track land reform programme was launched shortly after
the Zimbabwe African National Union – Patriotic Front (ZANU-PF)
government - which has been in power since independence in 1980
- experienced it first major political defeat in a national referendum
to change the constitution.
The government
responded to the food security crisis in Zimbabwe with a range of
policy measures, including requesting food aid from the international
community and establishing controls on basic food items. Reports
from organizations involved in monitoring food security and human
rights in Zimbabwe claim that the response to the food crisis has
been manipulated by the government for political gain. The state-controlled
Grain Marketing Board (GMB) dominates the trade in and distribution
of maize (the staple food) in Zimbabwe; its near monopoly on imports
and its poor distribution system have been criticized for undermining
the availability of maize throughout the current food crisis. Discrimination
in access to GMB grain has been very widely reported.
In May 2004
the government of Zimbabwe stated that the food crisis was over
and told the United Nations (UN) and international donors that Zimbabwe
no longer needed general food aid. Almost all independent monitors
- and even some of the government's own agencies - dispute the claim
that Zimbabwe's 2004 harvest is sufficient to meet the country's
needs. Local and international human rights groups, as well as organizations
involved in monitoring food security in Zimbabwe, believe the government's
claims are part of a strategy to manipulate people through fear
of hunger ahead of parliamentary elections scheduled for March 2005.
The government
of Zimbabwe has a human rights obligation to respect, protect and
fulfil the right to adequate food for all persons under its jurisdiction.
This report examines the extent to which the government has fulfilled
its obligations over the past four years. It examines a range of
government policies, including the impact of the implementation
of the fast-track land reform programme, and the government's management
of the food crisis. Recommendations are made on how to ensure the
effective and full realization of the right to adequate food in
Zimbabwe.
Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.
TOP
|