THE NGO NETWORK ALLIANCE PROJECT - an online community for Zimbabwean activists  
 View archive by sector
 
 
    HOME THE PROJECT DIRECTORYJOINARCHIVESEARCH E:ACTIVISMBLOGSMSFREEDOM FONELINKS CONTACT US
 

 


Back to Index

Attack on Magistrate Tsamba unacceptable
Zimbabwe Lawyers for Human Rights (ZLHR)
March 18, 2004

Zimbabwe Lawyers For Human Rights (ZLHR) is concerned at the growing incidences of the police re arresting suspects after the Courts will have ordered their release. The latest in those cases is that involving Mr. James Makamba whose release was ordered by Magistrate Ms Tsamba on 17 March 2004 following a precedent of the High Court in a matter with similar facts. Despite the court ordering his release, Mr. Makamba has remained in detention. The other prominent case where the police disregarded a court order is that involving Mr. Phillip Chiyangwa where the Executive defied Justice Bhunu’s order for the immediate release of Mr. Chiyangwa. Such blatant defiance and disregard of Court orders undermines the administration of justice and goes to the root of the independence of the judiciary. In particular such conduct seriously erodes the public’s confidence in the Courts and has grave consequences on the rule of law.

ZLHR is also gravely concerned at the continued use of The Herald and other state controlled public media as instruments to attack members of the judiciary who, in the course of their duties as judicial officers, make rulings that may not be favourable to certain quarters within the state. Magistrate Judith Tsamba becomes the latest victim when the Herald of 18 March 2004 reported that

" Magistrate’s ruling sparks outrage - There was outrage within the legal fraternity yesterday after Harare magistrate Ms Judith Tsamba released on bail businessman and politician James Makamba... The courts do not have the capacity and will never have that capacity to say each one of the police officers in the country must first obtain a warrant before they arrest anyone…A highly placed Government source.said ‘Ms Tsamba’s ruling was likely to bring chaos in the country’s justice system"

ZLHR maintains its position that such comments are contemptuous, unwarranted and calculated to bring the administration of justice into disrepute. It is also part of a wider, deliberate, systematic and sustained general attack on the judiciary to manipulate it, reduce its independence and weaken national institutions of protection that are vital for the restoration of the rule of law and democracy. Ms Tsamba is the latest victim among members of the legal profession to suffer an attack merely for doing his job as a judicial officer

Recommendations
ZLHR draws the government’s attention to the following instruments that clearly spell out its obligations and responsibilities towards ensuring that the Judiciary remains free from political or other interference:

  1. United Nations Basic Principles on the Independence of the Judiciary (1985), Article 1, which states:

    "The independence of the judiciary shall be guaranteed by the state and enshrined in the Constitution or the law of the country. It is the duty of governmental or other institutions to respect and observe the independence of the judiciary."

  2. United Nations Basic Principles on the Role of Lawyers (1990), Principle 17 which, states:

    "Where the security of lawyers is threatened as a result of discharging their function they shall be adequately safeguarded by the authorities"

  3. The Constitution of Zimbabwe, Section 79B, which states:

    "In the exercise of judicial authority a member of the judiciary shall not be subject the direction or control of any person or authority…"

ZLHR also draws the government’s attention to the report of the Special Rapporteur on the independence of the judges and lawyers, Dato’ Param Cumaraswammy, submitted to the United Nations Human Rights Commission dated 10 January 2003 which has a recommendation as follows:

" With regard to Zimbabwe, the Special Rapporteur once again urges the Commission to consider and address appropriately its concerns about the deterioration in that country, inter alia with regard to the independence of the judiciary and its impact on the rule of law."

ZLHR further draws the government’s attention to the recommendations of the African NGOs Forum at the African Commission’s 33rd session in Niger, which read in part that:

" The participants at the NGO Forum urge the African Commission on Human and Peoples Rights to recommend that the government of Zimbabwe;

take all necessary measures to ensure protection of lawyers, public prosecutors, magistrates, judges and to respect the independence of the judiciary."

ZLHR reiterates its grave concern at the upsurge in threats, harassment and intimidation of prosecutors, lawyers, magistrates and judges, particularly those handling human rights-related cases, and calls upon the government to comply with its obligations and responsibilities to guarantee the independence of the Judiciary and to ensure that adequate protection is offered to members of the legal fraternity in the exercise of their judicial functions. In particular all reports of subtle or direct threats, intimidation and harassment of the judges, magistrates, lawyers and public prosecutors must be promptly investigated and perpetrators prosecuted.

Visit the ZLHR fact sheet

Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.

TOP