| |
Back to Index
SOUTHERN
AFRICA: Region must prepare for recurring drought, report
IRIN
News
December 28, 2004
http://www.irinnews.org/report.asp?ReportID=44828
MBABANE - Southern
Africa should prepare itself for recurring drought, likely to strike at
least twice every decade, says a new report.
The report, 'Anticipating and Responding to Drought and Emergencies in
Southern Africa', was prepared for the New Partnership for Africa's Development
(NEPAD) and noted that the region could experience a recurrence of the
devastating drought of 2002/03, which resulted in a food deficit of 3.3
million mt.
"Market reform in the region has led to more diversified production patterns,
more decentralised food distribution systems, and more varied food consumption
patterns, at least in urban areas. Each of these changes should reduce
the region's dependence on external food aid during droughts," said the
report compiled by academics from Michigan State University in the United
States.
While the general regional situation shows some hopeful signs, the report
noted the concerns of some policy experts that many households have become
more vulnerable to shocks.
"This apparent increase in household vulnerability has become a standard
part of the understanding of the 2002-2003 food crisis," the report noted.
The impact of HIV/AIDS was the primary cause for household economic fragility.
Family financial resources that might be available for food purchases
went instead to medical and funeral expenses.
On the positive side, expanding early warning systems had saved lives,
the report noted.
Because weather and crop projections were made prior to the summer planting
season, governments and aid agencies were able to set up the infrastructure
necessary to bring emergency food relief to those projected to be in need.
"Early warning clearly worked during the 2002/03 crisis," the report said.
These systems alerted both governments and international donors to community
needs, prepared people for the eventuality of food shortages when harvests
were beginning to show signs of failure, and regularly updated data on
the numbers of people in need.
National Vulnerability Assessment Committees (VACs) were coordinated by
the Regional VAC of the Southern African Development Community (SADC),
to produce a system that represented an "exceptional degree of collaboration
among governments in the region, the emergency response committee, and
donor agencies," the report found.
Some systemic changes in regional agriculture also occurred during the
crisis. There was increased cultivation of cassava, a protein-rich tuber
more tolerant of dry spells than the region's staple food, maize. Over
the past decade, regional maize production has fluctuated due to erratic
rainfall.
The report noted that national food policies not only reflect the popularity
of maize as farmers' crop of choice, despite reported crop failures, but
they encourage its production. Malawi, Zambia and Zimbabwe in particular
were found to have maize-centric agricultural policies.
"More diversified production and more decentralised food distribution
systems should reduce the region's dependence on external food aid during
droughts by broadening the consumption base and making it easier to move
local production surpluses to populations in need," the report found.
Among donors, the realisation was growing that food aid should be considered
the last form of response to a food shortage crisis, rather than automatically
the first. Researchers claimed that most vulnerable families would rather
have cash transfers than food aid.
However, "a balanced approach also requires that market proponents and
food aid sceptics realise that not providing food aid and other transfers
to vulnerable households can push them further into poverty and undercut
their ability to use markets to ensure their food security in future crises,"
the report noted.
Improving food production through marketing means was seen as a key element
in averting future drought-induced food security problems. Reliable and
timely data on market needs was therefore essential.
"Operationally, governments need ... to facilitate market response during
crises [much more actively], turning to food aid only if markets and market-facilitating
measures are expected to be insufficient to meet the immediate food crisis,"
the researchers concluded.
Mozambique managed to keep food prices relatively stable in its market,
including the densely populated southern Maputo province, by allowing
market forces to work independently, unlike Zambia where food imports
were discouraged and prices spiked in urban areas.
Although northern Mozambique regularly produces food surpluses, inadequate
roads prevented the movement of produce to the south, which experiences
chronic food deficits. The government has encouraged northern farmers
to export their production, while allowing importers in the south to provide
for Maputo markets.
The report said local and cross border trade regulations had to be reformed
and called on governments to invest heavily to upgrade the professionalism
of their customs services.
The researchers also questioned the importance of strategic grain reserves,
which governments keep to ameliorate the effects of food shortages. "Strategic
grain reserves played no role in what was considered a successful response
to the 2002/03 crisis," the report said.
It criticised the perpetuation of food reserves in government policies,
given reports of widespread mismanagement of the reserves in the region,
and suggested that governments and donor agencies would better serve the
goal of mitigating food shortages by improving market information and
early warning systems.
The report also recommended improvements to road and rail infrastructure
in order to facilitate the movement of food to markets, and more transparent
external trade policies.
Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.
TOP
|