| |
Back to Index
Assessment
of the Food Situation in Zimbabwe - Dec 2002-Jan 2003: SUMMARY
National
NGO Food Security Network (FOSENET)
February 13, 2003
Download the
full report
- Microsoft
Word version - 151KB
- Acrobat
PDF version - 272KB
If
you do not have the free Acrobat reader on your computer, download
it from the Adobe website by clicking
here.
The National
NGO Food Security (FOSENET) involves 24 non government organisations
that collectively cover ALL districts of Zimbabwe, and all types
of communities. FOSENET members subscribe that food distribution
in Zimbabwe must be based on a platform of ethical principles derived
from international humanitarian law:
- The right
to life with dignity and the duty not to withhold or frustrate
the provision of life saving assistance;
- The obligation
of states and other parties to agree to provide humanitarian and
impartial assistance when the civilian population lacks essential
supplies;
- Relief not
to bring unintended advantage to one or more parties nor to further
any partisan position;
- The management
and distribution of food and other relief with based purely on
criteria of need and not on partisan grounds;
- Respect for
community culture and values of solidarity, dignity and peace
As one of its
functions FOSENET is monitoring food needs, availability and access.
Information
from 103 monitoring sites from 43 districts of Zimbabwe for December
2002 / January 2003 indicate that:
- Reduced food
security across districts in all provinces in December 02/ January
03 is reported to come mainly from marked reductions in volumes
of GMB deliveries and in commercial maize meal supplies.
- Absolute
scarcity of food supplies has taken over from cost factors
as the most common cause of vulnerability
- The share
of districts reporting that ‘everyone’ was in need has risen monthly
from 0% in September 2002 to the current level of around half
of districts (47%). For the third month in a row household
food stocks were reported at less than one month in all provinces.
- Scarcity
has been associated with price escalation in both GMB and commercial
market supplies. Reported upper prices of GMB grain of Z$200
/ 10kg and above are 75% above the controlled price, and more
districts have reported inflated GMB prices in this round. GMB
price controls are reported to have been better maintained in
Mashonaland Central and West and Matabeleland North provinces
since August 2002.
- Informal
and black market maize meal prices reported in December / January
ranged from Z$1000 -Z$3000 / 10kg, highest in urban areas. This
is a marked increase on prices reported in November 2002. Differences
between reported GMB grain prices and informal market maize meal
prices have widened from $490 /10 kg in July 02 to $2 800 / 10kg
in January 03. This is likely to drive black market activity and
leakages of control price grain unless these markets are controlled
or unless formal commercial supplies are increased. Leakages from
controlled price foods into black markets represent a flow of
public funds to private profits at the cost of poor households’
access to food.
- In the
absence of household stocks and other supplies, the demand for
relief food has grown. New relief supplies were reported in
six districts and a fall in supply in two districts. The state
cash for work programme coverage appears to have remained constant.
This round reports improvements in the inclusion of the elderly,
child headed households and ill people in relief.
- Absolute
scarcities are the primary overall obstacle to accessing food.
Barriers are more frequently reported to GMB food, less for commercial
market food and lowest in relief food. Political barriers are
the most commonly reported bias in access to GMB and commercial
food, increasing over previous months, while procedural barriers
are reported in relief supplies.
- The decline
in overall national food supplies reported in this round has produced
burdens on vulnerable households, indicated through school dropout,
increased costs to households of black market food costs, increased
time sourcing food reported, and through increased reported dependency
on relief.
- In nearly
half of districts households are reported to be using ‘coping’
strategies that may have negative effects. These include consuming
‘famine’ foods that could be potentially toxic, leaving the area
they live in, or not coping at all.
- In one district
(Mutare Rural) people are reported to be moving away from their
homes because of hunger. This would need to be followed up as
it is the first time an outflow of this nature has been reported
and could signal a transition from food insecurity to more extreme
famine type responses.
The falling
supply from GMB and commercial food sources, increased barriers
to food access and increased dependency on relief observed in this
round has raised the profile of equity and ethical issues. The trends
reported draw attention to the need for stronger implementation
and public reporting on measures to ensuring equitable use of available
publicly funded (GMB) food supplies, including eliminating the barriers
and unfair preferential access reported with increased frequency
in this round, and improving availability of commercial supplies
for those with purchasing power. Reports of political barriers to
GMB and commercial food supplies at a time when households are very
vulnerable due to absolute shortfalls contradicts ethical principles
of rights to life with dignity and of non partisan access to food.
Relief supplies
are reported to have increased, but relief dependency has also reportedly
grown. Many households are reported to be using ‘coping’ strategies,
including asset sales, school dropout, leaving home areas, and consumption
of potentially toxic ‘famine foods’ that may have long term negative
effects on households already impoverished by economic decline,
unemployment, land hunger and HIV/AIDS.
FOSENET
welcomes feedback on these reports.
Follow
up queries and feedback to: FOSENET, Box CY2720, Causeway, Harare
- fosenet@mweb.co.zw
Visit the FOSENET
fact sheet
Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.
TOP
|