THE NGO NETWORK ALLIANCE PROJECT - an online community for Zimbabwean activists  
 View archive by sector
 
 
    HOME THE PROJECT DIRECTORYJOINARCHIVESEARCH E:ACTIVISMBLOGSMSFREEDOM FONELINKS CONTACT US
 

 


Back to Index

Community Assessment of the Food Situation in Zimbabwe June/July 2002: FULL REPORT
National NGO Food Security Network (FOSENET)
October 12, 2002

Back to Contents, Previous Page, Next Page

Food availability

Almost all districts were reported to produce maize in normal years, and a further 19 districts were reported to produce other grains. This information will be followed up in future monitoring of seed access.

Household food stocks were reported to be extremely low, although variable across provinces. The table and bar chart below indicates the reports from monitors of the share of households with no food stocks, and food stocks estimated to last for less than and more than one month.

All areas are food insecure with stocks of less than one month. The reports suggest three levels of severity however: Mashonaland Central and East with the greater level household food stocks; Masvingo, Midlands and Manicaland with less food stocks and Matabeleland North and South in the most severe situation.

Table: Reported Household food stocks by province

Reported household food stocks

% households with No food stocks

% with food for < 1 month

% with food for >1 month

Manicaland

87

10

3

Mashonaland East

78

18

4

Mashonaland Central

45

41

13

Mashonaland West

n.a

n.a

n.a

Masvingo

81

18

1

Midlands

88

12

0

Matabeleland North

97

3

0

Matabeleland South

95

5

0

(Mash West did not have sufficient districts for this)

% of districts reporting food present during august/ September

Maize

Oil

Bread

Sugar

Manicaland

33

83

83

67

Mashonaland East

44

89

67

100

Mashonaland Central

20

60

60

60

Mashonaland West

n.a

n.a

n.a

n.a

Masvingo

0

14

43

29

Midlands

43

29

43

86

Matabeleland North

40

0

0

20

Matabeleland South

0

33

0

0

(Mash West did not have sufficient districts for this)

These findings compare with those produced by the USAID Famine Early Warning System Network (22 Jun 2002) giving some confidence in the reports.

As shown from the table above, this pattern held generally for availability of a number of food types with some variability. Generally food availability was reported to be best in Mashonaland East and worst in Matabeleland North and south. In respect of maize Masvingo, Matabeleland South and Mashonaland Central reported lowest availability.

GMB Deliveries
One of the most important sources of food is maize coming from GMB.

‘The GMB is failing to supply’ ‘The GMB is not delivering food anymore’ were common reports. When made they imply significant food insecurity in a district.

GMB deliveries are reported to be made to communities or obtained through the depots. GMB deliveries were reported to be infrequent and inadequate, with an average of 0,8 deliveries in the wards monitored per district in the month. (The July FOSENET report found an average of 1,5 deliveries in the wards covered by constituency in the past month). There was variability in the frequency of deliveries, with a range of 0-5 GMB deliveries within the month in the same site. The reported reduction in GMB deliveries in August – September compared to July 2002 needs to be further investigated.

It would be useful to have a more objective periodic report by the GMB of its pattern of deliveries across the country to parliament and the public.

The following districts were reported to have wards that had not received any grain deliveries in the period reviewed.

PROVINCE

Districts identified as having wards that had not received any GMB deliveries in the past month

Mashonaland East

Marondera rural

Mashonaland Central

Mount Darwin

Manicaland

Mutasa

Masvingo

Masvingo urban

Midlands

Gokwe, Chirumanzu

Matabeleland North

Tsholotsho, Lupane, Binga, Umguza

Matabeleland South

Bulilimamangwe, Matobo, Gwanda

The amounts delivered also varied, with Mashonaland East having the greatest average tonnage reported delivered and Matabeleland South the least. Notably the price range in Mat South was also high, with the greatest price reported of Z$190/10kg.

While the bottom level price of GMB sales was constant at the control price of Z$110/10kg, the upper ranges on varied up to Z$190/10kg or 73% above the control price.

Table: Reported frequency, amounts and costs of GMB maize

Amount and cost of food delivered

Reported average frequency of deliveries per sentinel ward

Estimated Average tonnes of GMB maize delivered per sentinel ward during the past month

Price range in Z$ / 10kg

Manicaland

0.8

13

110-135

Mashonaland East

1.0

18

110-136

Mashonaland Central

1.0

7

110-110

Mashonaland West

n.a

n.a

n.a

Masvingo

1.1

15

110-160

Midlands

0.8

8

110-119

Matabeleland North

0.5

12

110-160

Matabeleland South

0.5

4

110-190

(Mash West did not have sufficient districts for this)

The average tonnes per sentinel area was calculated as an average of the reported amounts delivered by province.

Market supplies
As noted earlier formal and informal market supplies are patchy with less than 50% of districts covered reporting maize availability and supply of bread and oil also at low levels. Sugar availability appears to have improved somewhat since the last round of monitoring, but not in Masvingo or Matabeleland. The cost of both formal and informal market foods has already been noted in the previous FOSENET monitoring report to be prohibitive. The table below indicates prices reported for each source per 10kg/ Maize.

Table: Reported frequency, amounts and costs of GMB maize

Price ranges of maize suppliers

Formal markets

Z$/10kg

Informal markets

Z$/10kg

GMB

Z$ / 10kg

Manicaland

Not sold

650-900

110-135

Mashonaland East

136

350-900

110-136

Mashonaland Central

Not sold

270-500

110-110

Mashonaland West

Not sold

700

n.a

Masvingo

800-850

500-1000

110-160

Midlands

110

500-880

110-119

Matabeleland North

111

240-750

110-160

Matabeleland South

300

500-1200

110-190

(Mash West did not have sufficient districts for this)

The average tonnes per sentinel area was calculated as an average of the reported amounts delivered by province.

The range of market prices are wide. The worst inflation on prices (over ten times the control price) is found in the area of greatest scarcity of both household stocks and GMB deliveries: Matabeleland South. There is less price distortion in areas where food stocks are higher and GMB food more available (Mashonaland East and Central).

Control of speculation on food prices is not succeeding. It would seem from these reports that informal speculation thrives in an environment where is the lack of choice due to lack of household stores, weak deliveries of controlled price food and no formal market sales. The similarities in upper limits between neighbouring provinces signals that people are moving across provinces to buy food.

Costs of up to $1200 per 10 kg of maize are beyond the means of poor households. What assets sales or sacrifices are people making to deal with such prices?

‘Two families nowadays share a 50kg bag and can only buy again after 2 months’ (Mutare rural)

Relief Deliveries
The areas reporting relief activities were:

PROVINCE

Areas identified as having relief food (and agencies named)

Mashonaland West

None

Mashonaland East

Chikomba (through hospital); Mudzi (World Vision)

Mashonaland Central

None

Manicaland

Mutare Urban (churches); Chipinge (FOST, Plan Int and Christian care), Mutasa (Plan Int)

Masvingo

Zaka (Care); Chivi (Care); Mwenezi (World Vision) Chiredzi (FACT) Masvingo urban (Care, Rudo, Red cross, FACT, AIDS levy fund, CADEC)

Midlands

Kwekwe (Plan Int, FCTZ)

Matabeleland North

Tsholotsho (Plan Int); Lupane (CADEC); Umguza (CADEC); Bubi (World Vision); Binga (Churches)

Matabeleland South

Bulilimamangwe (Care; World Vision; CADEC) Gwanda (World Vision)

These programmes are generally reported to target children under 5 years (in 67% of cited programmes), schoolchildren grade 1-7 (67%); pregnant women (7%), the elderly (19%), orphans (19%), patients (15%) disabled people (7%) and households (25%).

There is some degree of poor match between the targets of relief and the groups identified as vulnerable (See figure below). People with disabilities and the elderly seem to be relatively less well covered by relief.

Cash for work was reported to be operating in all districts monitored except Mwenezi. In only 12 districts did it operate as food, with cash, for work. The amounts earned ranged from Z$100/week to Z$750/week with relatively large variations within provinces.

The reports indicate that the payment rates in the cash for work programme are not applied in a standardised manner.

Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.

TOP