| |
Back to Index
This article participates on the following special index pages:
2008 harmonised elections - Index of articles
Rewarding
the losers - A case study of the Kenya and Zimbabwe electoral
commissions
ACT-Southern Africa
January 2009
Download
this document
- Acrobat
PDF version (240KB)
If you do not have the free Acrobat reader
on your computer, download it from the Adobe website by clicking
here.
Executive summary
The conduct of the Electoral Commission of Kenya (ECK) and the Zimbabwe
Electoral Commission (ZEC) during the 2007 and 2008 elections respectively
casts doubt into their independence, impartiality, professionalism,
integrity and transparency in the delivery of free and fair elections
to the electorate. Kenyan general elections were held on 27 December
2007 whilst the Zimbabwean harmonized elections were held on 29
March 2008, followed by the 'one man' Presidential run-off
election that took place on 27 June 2008. The elections under review
were given a blaze of publicity, all for wrong reasons. Public attention
was drawn by the controversy surrounding the election results and
the conflicts that emanated therefrom. The electorate was painfully
let down when the losers were rewarded. Democracy lost its meaning
because of individuals masquerading as neutral and fair yet their
motive was to serve the interests of appointing authorities. The
two cases under review should be perceived as important lessons
for emerging and established democracies in the world. The case
scenarios of Kenya and Zimbabwe are however contradicted by what
recently came out of the Ghanaian elections in which the opposition
won after a re-run and the electorate accepted the results.
The conduct
of the ECK and ZEC triggered conflicts that resulted in loss of
life, internal displacements and extreme insecurity in the two countries.
In Kenya alone, the violence left more than 1,200 people dead and
350,000 uprooted. In Zimbabwe, at least 160 people were killed and
about 30,000 were internally displaced. Other effects of the bungling
by the ZEC is that the state was left paralyzed, effectively with
no government in place from March 2008. In the case of Kenya deaths
occurred as a result of the stolen election whilst those in Zimbabwe
occurred in the context of the deliberate and calculated delay in
announcing the results and contrived run-off presidential election
pursuant to the requirements of the country's electoral laws
which required such a runoff in the case of any of the presidential
candidates failing to garner the requisite 50% plus votes.
In light of
the above, the report recommends that appropriate action should
be taken against all those responsible. This is in the spirit of
nurturing national reconciliation as happened in post Apartheid
South Africa and this will be a great source of healing for the
disappointed electorate, relatives and friends of the victims, and
communities which were ravaged. It will be a great disappointment
and betrayal if no action is taken against the ECK and ZEC and individuals
in charge of these institutions.
More specifically,
the investigation made the following fundamental findings:-
- The ECK
and ZEC failed or deliberately neglected to execute their mandates
in a fair, independent, professional, transparent and impartial
manner:- There are credible reports confirming that the ECK and
ZEC violated their founding principles in favour of Mwai Kibaki
and Robert Mugabe respectively.
- Violence
that occurred in Kenya and Zimbabwe before, during and after the
elections were directly and/or indirectly triggered by the conduct
of the ECK and ZEC:- The unprofessional conduct, lack of independence,
accountability and transparency and impartiality of the two bodies
is linked to the conflicts that took place. The ECK and ZEC should
therefore be held partly responsible for the violence and the
resulting deaths and suffering of the people that took place after
the elections had been conducted.
- A corrupt
relationship existed between ZEC, ZANU PF and the Executive arm
of the government of Zimbabwe:- In the case of Zimbabwe, Robert
Gabriel Mugabe, who allegedly stole the presidency with the help
of the ZEC, promoted the Chairperson of ZEC, George Chiweshe,
from the rank of Brigadier General (rtd) to that of Major General
accentuating the suspicions that ZEC was more of a state agent
rather than an independent electoral body. Also intriguing is
whether a retired soldier can be promoted whilst on retirement.
- Flawed election
processes in Kenya and Zimbabwe produced illegitimate leaders:-
Robert Gabriel Mugabe (President of ZANU PF) and Mwai Kibaki (President
of PNU) were generally viewed as illegitimate leaders even after
being sworn in. For instance a number of influential individuals
(e.g. Prime Minster Raila Odinga), institutions and governments
(Botswana, Zambia, Nigeria, Liberia, Uganda, South Africa and
Tanzania) refused to accept Robert Gabriel Mugabe as a legitimate
leader. It is a known reality that democratic elections are the
basis of the authority of any representative government. The fact
that both Presidents from Kenya and Zimbabwe agreed to enter into
governments of national unity (GNU) exposes them as suffering
from guilt conscience.
- Political
parties, candidates and other institutions of state power interfered
with the work of the ECK and ZEC:- There were credible confirmed
reports of interference in Kenya whilst in the case of Zimbabwe
there were credible suspicions.
- Poor management
of elections led to voter apathy:- A trend emerged in the Presidential
run-off in Zimbabwe that few people voted as compared to those
who participated in the first general election. The numbers of
all those who
participated in the Presidential run-off could have been much
lower if the electorate was not allegedly coerced to vote. Also
important to note is that the opposition MDC withdrew from the
election and the reasons cited include the
lack of independence of ZEC and the violence that preceded such
run-off.
Download
full document
Visit the ACT-Southern
Africa fact
sheet
Please credit www.kubatana.net if you make use of material from this website.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License unless stated otherwise.
TOP
|